Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups

From: The effects of different positions on lower extremity hemodynamics during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

Group

Age (Years, _x±s)

BMI [kg/m2, M(P25, P75)]

Prostate volume [cm3, M(P25, P75)]

Preoperative PSA (ng/ml, _x±s)

ASA (cases, %)

Grade I

Grade II

Observation group (n=98)

66.92±4.68

23.50(22.60,24.70)

43.00(42.00,46.00)

13.20(9.68,18.43)

36(36.73)

62(63.27)

Control group (n=98)

66.50±5.16

23.30(22.60,24.30)

43.00(41.00,45.25)

13.80(8.68,18.68)

34(34.69)

64(65.31)

t/Z/χ2 value

t=0.595

Z=0.504

Z=1.075

Z=0.251

χ2=0.089

P value

0.553

0.614

0.283

0.802

0.766

Group

Risk of Caprini thrombosis (cases, %)

Preoperative TNM staging (cases, %)

Lymph node dissection (cases, %)

High risk

Extremely high risk

cT1c

cT2a

cT2b

cT2c

Yes

No

Observation group (n=98)

34(34.69)

64(65.31)

3(3.06)

31(31.63)

40(40.82)

24(24.49)

23(23.47)

75(76.53)

Control group (n=98)

32(32.65)

66(67.35)

4(4.08)

30(30.61)

37(37.76)

27(27.55)

19(19.39)

79(80.61)

χ2 value

0.091

3.059

0.710

P value

0.762

0.801

0.701

  1. (1) PSA Prostate specific antigen
  2. (2) Caprini thrombus risk was assessed according to the guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of deep vein thrombosis (the third edition of 2017) [7]: low risk: 0 to 2 points; Moderate risk: 3-4 points; High risk: ≥ 5 points