Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparative analysis of two methods in circumcision: a new disposable device versus classic sleeve technique

Original Submission
11 Mar 2024 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Apr 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
15 Apr 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Panagiotis Mourmouris
24 Apr 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
26 Apr 2024 Author responded Author comments - Sinan Kılıç
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Apr 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Apr 2024 Author responded Author comments - Sinan Kılıç
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Apr 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 May 2024 Author responded Author comments - Sinan Kılıç
Resubmission - Version 5
1 May 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 5
3 May 2024 Author responded Author comments - Sinan Kılıç
Resubmission - Version 6
3 May 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 6
11 May 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
25 May 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
27 May 2024 Author responded Author comments - Sinan Kılıç
Resubmission - Version 7
27 May 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 7
9 Jun 2024 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
10 Jun 2024 Editorially accepted
14 Jun 2024 Article published 10.1186/s12894-024-01513-9

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page