Skip to main content

Reviewer acknowledgements

A peer-reviewed journal would not survive without the generous time and insightful comments of the reviewers, whose efforts often go unrecognized. Although final decisions are always editorial, they are greatly facilitated by the deeper technical knowledge, scientific insights, understanding of social consequences, and passion that reviewers bring to our deliberations. For these reasons, the Editors and staff of BMC Urology would like to publicly acknowledge our peer reviewers.

Affiliated with

  • BMC Urology works with with Cochrane Urology in providing our authors with expert advice on systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Annual Journal Metrics

  • 2022 Citation Impact
    2.0 - 2-year Impact Factor
    2.2 - 5-year Impact Factor
    1.177 - SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper)
    0.616 - SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)

    2022 Speed
    23 days submission to first editorial decision for all manuscripts (Median)
    145 days submission to accept (Median)

    2022 Usage 
    1,162,825 downloads
    1,128 Altmetric mentions 

Peer-review Terminology

  • The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:

    Identity transparency: Single anonymized

    Reviewer interacts with: Editor

    Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication

    More information is available here

Sign up for article alerts and news from this journal