Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Urology

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Erectile function in men with end-stage liver disease improves after living donor liver transplantation

  • You-Chiuan Chien1,
  • Heng-Chieh Chiang1,
  • Ping-Yi Lin2 and
  • Yao-Li Chen3, 4Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Urology201515:83

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0078-6

Received: 28 December 2014

Accepted: 4 August 2015

Published: 13 August 2015

Abstract

Background

Impaired liver function in men can result in erectile dysfunction or hypogonadism or both. We investigated whether living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) results in improvement in male sexual function.

Methods

A total of 58 patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) were included in this prospective, cross-sectional study. Erectile function was measured before and after LDLT using a five-item modified version of the International Index of Erectile Function scale (IIEF-5) and hypogonadism was evaluated before and after LDLT using the Androgen Deficiency in the Aging Male (ADAM) questionnaire. Differences in mean values from the questionnaires before and after the operation were than evaluated to determine whether there is an association between LDLT and improvement in sexual function.

Results

We found that mean IIEF-5 scores significantly increased after LDLT (from 11.7 ± 7.7 before LDLT to 14.7 ± 7.5 after LDLT, p <0.01), indicating that the operation played a role in improving erectile function. In addition, the prevalence of hypogonadism among the patients with ESLD decreased markedly after liver transplantation (hypogonadism before LDLT, n = 41 versus hypogonadism after LDLT, n = 31, p = 0.03). Patients with hypogonadism reported a higher prevalence of erectile dysfunction after LDLT than patients without hypogonadism (p <0.01).

Conclusions

LDLT results in improvement in erectile function. In addition, improvement in erectile function is associated with self-reported absence of hypogonadism.

Background

Liver transplantation is considered standard curative therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and for patients with alcohol-related end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Improvements in surgical techniques as well as medical therapy have resulted in better long-term survival outcomes for patients who require liver transplantation. However, patients with chronic disease tend to care more about quality of life than about the duration of life. Sexual function, a component of quality of life, is a major concern for men with ESLD and for those who have received liver transplantation [1, 2]. Damage to the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and impaired liver function are the main causes of sexual dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis [1, 3]. Studies have shown that orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) can result in restoration of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis [4, 5].

Religious beliefs, cultural values, educational systems and differences in legislation associated with brain death help to explain why OLT is not as common in Asian countries as in Western countries [6]. Increased need for liver transplantation and a shortage of deceased donors led to the development of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) as an alternative to OLT. Although long-term survival rates, organ rejection rates, and rates of hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence have been shown to be more or less equal between LDLT and OLT, studies have shown that LDLT is associated with a shorter ischemic time, a lower mortality rate, and greater peri-operative benefits than OLT [7].

The prevalence of erectile dysfunction is high in patients with ESLD [8]. Although the gold standard for determining the presence of hypogonadism in men is measuring free testosterone level, that test is not widely performed in clinical laboratories. An alternative to measuring free testosterone in serum is to administer the self-report Androgen Deficiency in the Aging Male (ADAM) questionnaire, which is designed to assess symptoms associated with androgen deficiency and, therefore, can be used as a tool to detect and measure the degree of hypogonadism. The ADAM questionnaire is a simple, non-invasive measure that has been shown to have a high sensitivity and a relatively acceptable specificity [9, 10].

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is defined as the inability to develop or maintain an erection during sexual intercourse and is the main domain of sexual dysfunction in men [8]. Although ED is an important quality-of-life issue, it is often underestimated by patients and physicians. The five-item International Index of Erection Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire provides a measurable scale with which to estimate the true prevalence of ED [11]. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have evaluated the effect of LDLT on sexual function in men. Thus, in this study, we measured the differences in pre- and post-surgical IIEF-5 and ADAM questionnaire scores to investigate whether LDLT affects sexual function in men.

Methods

Patients

The patients in this prospective cohort study comprised 68 men with end-stage liver disease who were scheduled to undergo LDLT at the Changhua Christian hospital (Changhua, Taiwan) during the period 2006–2012. Written informed consents were obtained from the patients. The five-item International Index of Erection Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire, designed to evaluate erectile dysfunction, and the Androgen Deficiency in the Aging Male (ADAM) questionnaire, designed to measure the degree of hypogonadism, were administered to the patients before LDLT and six months after the operation. Patients were required to complete the IIEF-5 questionnaire in the outpatient department about six to seven months after transplantation. At the end of the study period, 10 men were excluded from the study because of because of working abroad (n = 2), because they refused to complete the questionnaires (n = 6), or because of self-reported inability to understand the questionnaire during the post-operative period (n = 2). Therefore, data on 58 patients were evaluated (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Scheme of patient selection in the study

The Institutional Review Board of the Changhua Christian hospital approved the study.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Adult (≥18 years) male recipients of living donor liver transplant who had completed a 6-month follow-up assessment were considered eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included female gender, age < 18 years, liver graft failure, refusal to complete the post-LDLT questionnaires, and loss to follow-up for any reason.

Survey

An introductory letter comprising a detailed description of the methodology of the study, the future consequences of the study, the name of the contact person of the study, and associated information was presented to each participant before LDLT. Data collection was completed by two doctors in the urology division of the surgery department via telephone or face-to-face interview. Etiology of liver disease (hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, or alcoholism), alcohol intake history, the presence of diabetes and demographic data were obtained through chart review.

Main outcome measures

Measures

The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), also known as the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM), is a widely used questionnaire for the evaluation of male sexual function and is recommended as a primary endpoint for diagnostic evaluation of ED severity by the National Institutes of Health Consensus Panel on Impotence [12]. The IIEF-5 is a modified version of the IIEF comprising five items instead of 15 items and was designed to shorten the time needed to complete the survey. The IIEF-5 questionnaire shows the presence and severity of ED over the past six months [13]. Studies have shown that the validity and sensitivity of the IIEF-5 are similar to those of the original IIEF scale [11, 14]. The IIEF-5 is graded on a scale from 1 to 5 points for each of the five items. The total score therefore ranges from 5 to 25. The primary score is classified into five categories of severity, namely severe (score 5–7), moderate (score 8–11), mild-to-moderate (score 12–16), mild (score 17–21), and no ED (score 22–25). The Androgen Deficiency in the Aging Male (ADAM) questionnaire is a self-report, ten-item scale designed to evaluate the degree of androgen deficiency [10]. ADAM consists of 10 questions and answering “yes” to question 1 or 7 or to 3 or more of the questions is regard as an indication of possible hypogonadal status. ADAM has been shown to be a highly sensitive but poorly specific measure for determining androgen deficiency [15]. Nonetheless, Tancredi et al. found that hormone analysis of blood samples correlated with ADAM scores [9]. Patients who reported decreased libido or inadequate erectile “strength” and patients who provided positive answers to 3 of the other questions listed in the questionnaire were considered to have androgen deficiency. Both questionnaires were given to patients before LDLT and at least six months after the operation to evaluate whether LDLT had an effect on erectile dysfunction and hypogonadism.

Statistical analysis

Categorical data were compared by the McNemar's test or the Chi-square test. Differences in continuous variables were compared by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. All statistical analyses were performed on a personal computer with the statistical package SPSS for Windows (Version 18.0, SPSS, Chicago, Il).

Results

During the period November 2012 to May 2013, 58 of the 68 (85 %) adult men who were eligible to participate in the study completed both questionnaires before and after LDLT. Reasons for not completing the questionnaires during the post-operative period included refusal to participate (n = 6), working abroad (n = 2), and self-reported inability to understand the questionnaire (n = 2). Table 1 summarizes the general characteristics of the patients who participated in the study. The mean age at the time of LDLT was 53.86 ± 7.53 years. Alcohol abuse was self-reported in 17 patients before LDLT and in 4 after the operation. In addition, 15 of the patients had diabetes mellitus before surgery and 27 had the disorder after LDLT (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of the population before and after transplantation

 

Before transplantation

N (%)

After transplantation

N (%)

p value

Age (years; mean ± SD)

53.86 ± 7.53

55.02 ± 7.33

< 0.001

Alcohol abuse

17 (29.3)

4 (6.9)

< 0.001

HBV

34 (58.6)

1 (1.7)

< 0.001

HCV

17 (29.3)

6 (10.3)

0.001

Diabetes

15 (25.9)

27 (46.6)

< 0.001

IIEF5 score (mean ± SD)

11.7 ± 7.7

14.7 ± 7.5

0.001

Suspected hypogonadism via ADAM questionnaire

41 (70.6)

31 (53.4)

0.031

Change in erectile dysfunction

We found that mean IIEF-5 scores significantly increased after LDLT (from 11.7 ± 7.7 before LDLT to 14.7 ± 7.5 after LDLT, p <0.01), indicating that the operation played a role in improving erectile function. Overall, 28 patients reported improvement in erectile function, 23 patients reported no change in erectile function and 7 patients reported worse erectile function. We also found that the degrees of ED changed among the study population after surgery (Table 2). The percentage of patients with IIEF-5 scores indicative of severe ED or mild-to-moderate ED was markedly lower after LDLT (24.1 % vs. 37.9 % and 17.2 % vs. 31.0 % respectively) and the percentage of patients with IIEF-5 scores indicating no ED was noticibly higher after LDLT (13.8 % vs. 6.9 %). Interestingly, however, the percentage of patients with scores indicative of moderate ED or mild ED was higher after LDLT (5.2 % vs. 3.4 % and 39.7 % vs. 20.7 %, respectively) (Table 2) (Fig. 2).
Table 2

Changes of erectile dysfunction prior to and after liver transplantation

  

Before transplantation

N (%)

After transplantation

N (%)

p value

Categories of IIEF5 score

Severe ED

22 (37.9)

14 (24.1)

< 0.001

 

Moderate ED

2 (3.4)

3 (5.2)

 
 

Mild to moderate ED

18 (31.0)

10 (17.2)

 
 

Mild ED

12 (20.7)

23 (39.7)

 
 

No ED

4 (6.9)

8 (13.8)

 
Fig. 2

Prevalence of erectile dysfunction prior to and after liver transplantation

Change in hypogonadism

The prevalence of hypogonadism among the patients with ESLD decreased markedly after liver transplantation based on the scores from the ADAM questionnaires administered before and after surgery (hypogonadism before LDLT, n = 41 vs. hypogonadism after LDLT, n = 31, p = 0.031).

Association of erectile dysfunction and hypogonadism

We found that hypogonadism before LDLT was associated with improvement in erectile function after LDLT. There was a significant correlation between hypogonadism before LDLT and IIEF-5 score prior to LDLT (Fig. 3). In patients with ADAM questionnaire scores indicating no hypogonadism, the mean IIEF-5 score was 15.35 ± 6.89 prior to LDLT and 19.92 ± 4.92 after LDLT (p <0.01) (Table 3). In patients with ADAM scores indicative of hypogonadism, the mean IIEF-5 score was 8.75 ± 7.07 before surgery and 10.53 ± 6.65 after LDLT (p = 0.107).
Fig. 3

Correlation between erectile dysfunction before and after transplantation for patients with or without hypogonadism

Table 3

IIEF-5 scores before and after transplantation for each group

 

IIEF-5 score

 
 

Before transplantation

(mean ± SD)

After transplantation

(mean ± SD)

p value

With hypogonadism

8.75 ± 7.07

10.53 ± 6.65

0.109

Without hypogonadism

15.35 ± 6.89

19.92 ± 4.92

0.001

HCV positive

9.24 ± 6.98

11.06 ± 7.81

0.247

HCV negative

12.73 ± 7.80

16.27 ± 6.97

0.001

With DM

10.48 ± 6.51

12.15 ± 7.40

0.094

Without DM

12.77 ± 8.53

17.00 ± 7.02

0.002

Factors associated with post-LDLT erectile dysfunction

The existence of HCV infection was significantly associated with lower IIEF-5 scores (mean IIEF-5 score in patients with HCV = 11.06 ± 7.81 vs. mean IIEF-5 score in patients without HCV = 16.27 ± 6.97, p = 0.015). Patients with clinical evidence of DM had lower IIEF-5 scores than those without diabetes (IIEF-5 of patients with DM = 12.15 ± 7.40 vs. IIEF-5 of patients without DM = 17.00 ± 7.02, p = 0.013). Other parameters such as alcohol-related origin of liver disease, development of post-transplantation DM, and gender of donor were not associated with the development of post-LDLT erectile dysfunction or hypogonadism.

Discussion

Determination of sexual health is challenging, especially in Asian men who are often reluctant to undergo evaluation of sexual function. The response rate among participants to questionnaires designed to survey sexual function has been reported to range from 22.5 % to 81 % [8, 11, 16]. In our study, however, the response rate was 85 %. The introductory letters written by the surgeon who performed the LDLT procedures most likely contributed to the relatively high compliance rate in our study. The etiology of sexual dysfunction is multi-factorial and ESLD is one of many factors associated with the disorder. Liver transplantation restores liver function and should, theoretically, result in improvements in sexual function [8]. However, immunosuppressive drugs, which are key to survival after liver transplantation, are known to impair sexual function [17]. Alterations in the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, changes in estrogen-over-androgen ratio, and altered sex hormone transport have been shown to cause hypogonadism in patients with impaired liver function [16, 18, 19]. Decreased testosterone level, libido, testis size and even infertility have been reported in patients with cirrhosis [3, 20]. Foresta et al. reported decreased sex hormone binding protein levels and higher free testosterone in serum in patients after OLT, which may explain the improvement in physiological function after the operation, even under immunosuppressive therapy [4]. Park et al. reported that up to 60 % of men reported no improvement in erectile function after OLT [10]. Klein and colleagues reported improvement in sexual function including erectile function, sexual satisfaction and sexual desire and a statistical trend in improvement in IIEF scores after liver transplant [21]. In our study, we found that nearly half of the patients reported improvement in erectile function. Many factors contribute to ED, including drugs, neurogenic disorders, cavernosal disorders, hormones, psychological causes, surgery, aging, and diabetes [22]. In our study, higher IIEF-5 scores were associated with absence of hypogonadism after the operation. That is, improvement in erectile function after liver transplantation is mainly hormone related. Theoretically, irreversible damage of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis by long-term consumption of alcohol implies the low possibility of improvement in sexual function after LDLT [23]. However, Huyghe E et al. reported no higher risk of erectile dysfunction in patients with end-stage liver disease secondary to alcohol consumption [8]. Burra et al. also reported that there was no significantly lower trend in IIEF score in patients with alcohol-induced ESLD [3]. Sorrell and Brown found that 40 % of patients developed erectile dysfunction and 25 % reported having a lower level of sexual satisfaction after liver transplantation [16]. Ho et al. reported that 32 % of patients developed de novo sexual dysfunction after OLT [24]. Cardiovascular disease, post-transplantation diabetes, alcohol abuse, antidepressants and angiotensin II receptor blockers have been shown to be associated with new onset erectile dysfunction after liver transplantation [8]. In our study, 12 % (n = 7) of our patients reported a decrease in erectile function after LDLT. The low incidence of de novo erectile dysfunction might be due to the relatively short follow-up period in our study.

There are several limitations in this study. First, immunosuppressive regimens after transplantation were not consistent throughout the study population. Therefore, we were not able to take pharmacologic factors into account. Second, our findings are limited by the relatively small sample size and short follow-up period. Third, we did not measure serum testosterone levels and therefore we do not have laboratory data to support the change in prevalence of hypogonadism. Nonetheless, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare changes in sexual function before and after LDLT. Large-scale studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to clarify the role liver transplantation plays in sexual function.

Conclusions

LDLT results in improvement in erectile function. In addition, improvement in erectile function is associated with absence of hypogonadism before LDLT.

Notes

Declarations

Funding

None declared.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of urology, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital
(2)
Transplant Medicine & Surgery Research Centre, Changhua Christian Hospital
(3)
School of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University
(4)
Department of General Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital

References

  1. Bravata DM, Olkin I, Barnato AE, Keeffe EB, Owens DK. Health-related quality of life after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis. Liver transplantation and surgery : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society. 1999;5:318–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Durazzo M, Premoli A, Di Bisceglie C, Bo S, Ghigo E, Manieri C. Male sexual disturbances in liver diseases: what do we know? J Endocrinol Invest. 2010;33:501–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Burra P, Germani G, Masier A, De Martin E, Gambato M, Salonia A, et al. Sexual dysfunction in chronic liver disease: is liver transplantation an effective cure? Transplantation. 2010;89:1425–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Foresta C, Schipilliti M, Ciarleglio FA, Lenzi A, D'Amico D. Male hypogonadism in cirrhosis and after liver transplantation. J Endocrinol Invest. 2008;31:470–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Madersbacher S, Ludvik G, Stulnig T, Grunberger T, Maier U. The impact of liver transplantation on endocrine status in men. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1996;44:461–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen CL, Kabiling CS, Concejero AM. Why does living donor liver transplantation flourish in Asia? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10:746–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Akamatsu N, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N. Living-donor vs deceased-donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World j hepatol. 2014;6:626–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Huyghe E, Kamar N, Wagner F, Yeung SJ, Capietto AH, El-Kahwaji L, et al. Erectile dysfunction in liver transplant patients. Am j transplant : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. 2008;8:2580–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Tancredi A, Reginster JY, Schleich F, Pire G, Maassen P, Luyckx F, et al. Interest of the androgen deficiency in aging males (ADAM) questionnaire for the identification of hypogonadism in elderly community-dwelling male volunteers. Eur j endocrinol / European Federation of Endocrine Societies. 2004;151:355–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Morley JE, Charlton E, Patrick P, Kaiser FE, Cadeau P, McCready D, et al. Validation of a screening questionnaire for androgen deficiency in aging males. Metab: clin exp. 2000;49:1239–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Wu CJ, Hsieh JT, Lin JS, Hwang TI, Jiann BP, Huang ST, et al. Comparison of prevalence between self-reported erectile dysfunction and erectile dysfunction as defined by five-item International Index of Erectile Function in Taiwanese men older than 40 years. Urology. 2007;69:743–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Gendrano 3rd N. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a state-of-the-science review. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14:226–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Pena BM. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1999;11:319–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Heidelbaugh JJ. Management of erectile dysfunction. Am Fam Physician. 2010;81:305–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Morley JE, Perry 3rd HM, Kevorkian RT, Patrick P. Comparison of screening questionnaires for the diagnosis of hypogonadism. Maturitas. 2006;53:424–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sorrell JH, Brown JR. Sexual functioning in patients with end-stage liver disease before and after transplantation. Liver transpl : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society. 2006;12:1473–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Rovira J, Diekmann F, Ramirez-Bajo MJ, Banon-Maneus E, Moya-Rull D, Campistol JM. Sirolimus-associated testicular toxicity: detrimental but reversible. Transplantation. 2012;93:874–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gavaler JS, Van Thiel DH. Gonadal dysfunction and inadequate sexual performance in alcoholic cirrhotic men. Gastroenterology. 1988;95:1680–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang G, Yang J, Li M, Liu B, Jiang N, Fu B, et al. Liver transplant may improve erectile function in patients with benign end-stage liver disease: single-center Chinese experience. Exp clin transplant : official journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation. 2013;11:332–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Karagiannis A, Harsoulis F. Gonadal dysfunction in systemic diseases. Eur j endocrinol / European Federation of Endocrine Societies. 2005;152:501–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Klein J, Tran SN, Mentha-Dugerdil A, Giostra E, Majno P, Morard I, et al. Assessment of sexual function and conjugal satisfaction prior to and after liver transplantation. Ann transplant : quarterly of the Polish Transplantation Society. 2013;18:136–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. McMahon CG, Jannini E, Waldinger M, Rowland D. Standard operating procedures in the disorders of orgasm and ejaculation. J Sex Med. 2013;10:204–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Burra P. Liver abnormalities and endocrine diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;27:553–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ho JK, Ko HH, Schaeffer DF, Erb SR, Wong C, Buczkowski AK, et al. Sexual health after orthotopic liver transplantation. Liver transpl: official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society. 2006;12:1478–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Chien et al. 2015

Advertisement