Open Access

Lymphovascular invasion status at transurethral resection of bladder tumors may predict subsequent poor response of T1 tumors to bacillus Calmette-Guérin

  • Keishiro Fukumoto1,
  • Eiji Kikuchi1Email author,
  • Shuji Mikami2,
  • Akira Miyajima1 and
  • Mototsugu Oya1
BMC UrologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:5

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-016-0122-1

Received: 9 February 2015

Accepted: 13 January 2016

Published: 19 January 2016

Abstract

Background

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is an important step in the process of tumor dissemination and metastasis outside the primary organ, but the relationship between LVI and the prognosis of T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has not been fully evaluated. Accordingly, the present study was performed to evaluate whether LVI had an impact on the clinical outcome in patients with T1 NMIBC.

Methods

A total of 116 consecutive patients were diagnosed with T1 NMIBC from 1994 to 2013 at Keio University Hospital. All cases were reviewed by a single uro-pathologist. The prognostic significance of LVI was assessed in relation to recurrence and stage progression.

Results

The median follow-up period was 53 months. LVI was histologically confirmed in 30 patients (25.9%). There were no significant differences of clinical features between the patients with and without LVI. In T1 patients, univariate analysis demonstrated that LVI positivity was associated with stage progression (p = 0.003), but not with tumor recurrence (p = 0.192). Multivariate analysis confirmed that LVI was independently associated with stage progression (p = 0.006, hazard ratio = 4.00). In 85 patients who received BCG instillation, LVI was independently associated with both tumor recurrence and stage progression (p = 0.036 and 0.024, hazard ratio = 2.19 and 3.76).

Conclusions

LVI is a strong indicator of an increased risk of recurrence and progression in BCG-treated patients with T1 NMIBC. This information might assist clinicians to develop appropriate management and counseling strategies for these patients.

Keywords

Urinary bladder neoplasms Carcinoma Transitional cell Lymphatic metastasis Recurrence Disease progression

Background

The optimum management and therapeutic strategy for T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are still being debated. As T1 NMIBC has a higher risk of recurrence and higher progression rate, current guidelines recommend adjuvant therapy with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) [1]. However, recurrence affects about half of all patients with T1 NMIBC who receive BCG therapy and 17 %–23 % show progression to muscle invasive tumors [2, 3]. Patients with a very high risk of recurrence and stage progression should receive more aggressive therapy such as immediate total cystectomy [4]. The clinical outcome of immediate cystectomy for T1 NMIBC is good, with the 10-year disease-specific survival rate being approximately 80 % [5, 6], but not all T1 patients need radical surgery, which has a relatively high morbidity rate and reduces the quality of life [7]. One of the major issues regarding management of T1 NMIBC is the lack of appropriate tools for identifying patients with a very high risk of stage progression. Various prognostic factors that predict a poor outcome of Ta/T1 NMIBC have been reported, including the sex [3], age [8, 9], tumor diameter [10], multifocality [8, 10], concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) [10, 11], CIS in the prostatic urethra [3], histological grade [8], and molecular grade determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization [12]. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is considered to be the most important step in the initiation of tumor dissemination/metastasis, and it has been identified as a strong indicator of a poor prognosis for various cancers, including carcinoma of the lung [13], breast [14], colon [15], kidney [16], and prostate [17], as well as urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract [18, 19]. In patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular tumors, information on LVI status was reported to be important for making a decision about whether or not to provide adjuvant chemotherapy [20]. In patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer treated by total cystectomy, LVI is a strong indicator of poor survival, since the 10-year cancer-specific survival rate is 31.0 %–39.3 % for LVI-positive patients versus 72.0 %–73.6 % for LVI-negative patients [21, 22]. A few investigators have evaluated the influence of LVI in TURBT specimens of NMIBC patients, but conflicting results have been reported [2326]. Therefore, we investigated the association of LVI status reviewed by a dedicated uro-pathologist with clinical background factors in T1 NMIBC patients and evaluated whether LVI was useful for identifying a higher risk of stage progression.

Methods

Patients

A total of 662 patients with newly diagnosed NMIBC were treated from January 1994 to December 2013 at Keio University Hospital and 165 patients had T1 NMIBC (Fig. 1). Fifteen patients who received TURBT at other institutions were excluded. Patients with pure non-urothelial carcinoma (e.g., squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma), a history of upper tract urothelial carcinoma, and follow-up for less than 6 months were also excluded (4, 22, and 4 patients, respectively). Furthermore, we excluded 4 patients who had undergone total cystectomy without confirmation of progression. Two of them had received immediate total cystectomy, which meant that it was performed soon after TURBT without further intravesical therapy. The other 2 patients had received early total cystectomy, which was performed after recurrence but before stage progression. Finally, 116 subjects were included in this analysis, among whom 85 had received instillation of BCG after TURBT.
Fig. 1

Flow diagram of the study population

Evaluation of resected specimens

All specimens were reviewed by a dedicated uro-pathologist who was unaware of the clinical outcome. Based on examination of hematoxylin and eosin stained sections, LVI was considered to be present when tumor cells were unequivocally noted within or attached to the walls of a vascular or lymphatic space (Fig. 2). Multiple serial sections were viewed and immunohistochemical markers for lymphatic channels (D2-40) and endothelial cells (CD31/34) were used in equivocal cases.
Fig. 2

LVI (arrowhead) in a tumor specimen. Hematoxylin and eosin staining, × 400

Treatment

Intravesical BCG therapy was generally performed for intermediate or high risk NMIBC according to the current clinical guidelines [1]. However, the attending physician and/or patient sometimes decided against treatment with BCG because of side effects. Instillation of BCG was begun 4 to 5 weeks after TURBT and was continued at weekly intervals for 6 to 8 weeks at a dose of 80 mg (Tokyo 172 strain) or 81 mg (Connaught strain). Patients were followed postoperatively with cystoscopy and urinary cytology every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for the next 3 years, and annually thereafter. Excretory urography and/or computed tomography were performed to evaluate the upper urinary tract every year for 5 years after treatment.

Endpoints

We defined tumor recurrence as any evidence of disease on follow-up evaluation, while progression was defined as muscle invasion or metastasis. Recurrence-free survival time was calculated as the interval between TURBT and the date of tumor recurrence, while progression-free survival was determined from the date of TURBT to progression. Cancer-specific survival and overall survival were based on death from bladder cancer and death from any cause, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Variables were compared between different groups by using the χ2 test. Recurrence-and progression-free survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival curves were compared with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses of tumor recurrence and stage progression were done using the Cox proportional hazards model with stepwise forward regression. The independent variables included in survival analysis were patient age (<70 vs. ≥70 years), sex, tumor grade (G1/2 vs. G3), concomitant CIS, multifocality, intravesical BCG therapy, intravesical chemotherapy, a history of Ta NMIBC, and LVI status (positive or negative). Differences between groups were regarded as significant at P < 0.05. All analyses were performed with the SPSS v. 21.0 statistical software package (IBM Corp., Somers, NY).

Ethics and consent

This study was conducted subject to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by our ethical committee. The reference number is 20130101. The ethical committee exempted obtaining informed consent because our study design was done by a retrospective fashion. Data were obtained from medical chart and patient identifying information was anonymized before analysis.

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics of the 116 patients

The median age of the patients was 70.6 years (range: 40 to 89 years). Men accounted for 84.5% of the patients (n = 98) and women for 15.5% (n = 18). LVI was histologically confirmed in 30 patients (25.9%). Table 1 presents the association between clinicopathological characteristics and LVI status in the 116 patients. There were no significant differences of clinical features between the LVI-positive and LVI-negative patients. During the median follow-up period of 53 months (range: 6–239 months), 47 of 116 patients (40.5%) experienced recurrence and 16 patients (13.8%) showed stage progression. Of the 16 patients with stage progressions, one had distant metastasis. Fourteen patients died (12.1%) and 7 patients (6.0%) died of their disease.
Table 1

Clinicopathological characteristics of 116 patients stratified according to LVI status

Characteristic

Total

LVI positive

LVI negative

p value

No. of patients

116

 

30

 

86

  

Age

      

0.073

 <70 years

55

(47.4 %)

10

(33.3 %)

45

(52.3 %)

 

 ≥70 years

61

(52.6 %)

20

(66.7 %)

41

(47.7 %)

 

Sex

      

0.256

 Male

98

(84.5 %)

27

(90.0 %)

71

(82.6 %)

 

 Female

18

(15.5 %)

3

(10.0 %)

15

(17.4 %)

 

Tumor grade

      

0.115

 G1/2

7

(6.0 %)

0

(0.0%)

7

(8.1 %)

 

 G3

109

(94.0 %)

30

(100.0%)

79

(91.9 %)

 

Concomitant CIS

      

0.247

 Positive

26

(22.4 %)

9

(30.0 %)

17

(19.8 %)

 

 Negative

90

(77.6 %)

21

(70.0 %)

69

(80.2 %)

 

Multifocality

      

0.638

 Multiple

85

(73.3 %)

21

(70.0 %)

64

(74.4 %)

 

 Solitary

31

(26.7 %)

9

(30.0 %)

22

(25.6 %)

 

BCG instillation

      

0.334

 Yes

85

(73.3 %)

24

(80.0 %)

61

(70.9 %)

 

 No

31

(26.7 %)

6

(20.0 %)

25

(29.1 %)

 

Intravesical chemotherapy

      

0.601

 Yes

16

(13.8 %)

4

(13.3 %)

12

(14.0 %)

 

 No

100

(86.2 %)

26

(86.7%)

74

(86.0 %)

 

History of Ta NMIBC

      

0.418

 Recurrence

7

(6.0 %)

1

(3.3 %)

6

(7.0 %)

 

 Primary

109

(94.0 %)

29

(96.7 %)

80

(93.0 %)

 

LVI Lymphovascular invasion, CIS Carcinoma in situ, BCG Bacillus Calmette-Guérin, NMIBC Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Predictors of recurrence and stage progression in all patients

Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictors of tumor recurrence and stage progression (Table 2). Recurrence was noted in 16 patients (53.3%) from the LVI-positive group and 31 patients (36.0%) from the LVI-negative group. Treatment with BCG (p = 0.005) and intravesical chemotherapy (p = 0.007) had a significant influence on tumor recurrence according to univariate analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that BCG therapy was an independent determinant of a lower risk of tumor recurrence (p = 0.007, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.44).
Table 2

Results of univariate and multivariate analyses

Characteristic

Recurrence-free survival

Progression-free survival

 

Univariate

Multivariate

Univariate

Multivariate

 

p value

HR (95 % CI)

p value

p value

HR (95 % CI)

p value

Age

0.133

  

0.775

  

 <70 years

      

 ≥70 years

      

Sex

0.166

  

0.861

  

 Male

      

 Female

      

Tumor grade

0.916

  

0.289

  

 G1/2

      

 G3

      

Concomitant CIS

0.653

  

0.925

  

 Positive

      

 Negative

      

Multifocality

0.063

  

0.344

  

 Single

      

 Multiple

      

BCG instillation

0.005

 

0.007

0.953

  

 Yes

 

0.44 (0.24–0.80)

    

 No

      

Intravesical chemotherapy

0.007

  

0.631

  

 Yes

      

 No

      

History of Ta NMIBC

0.735

  

0.245

  

 Recurrence

      

 Primary

      

Lymphovascular invasion

0.192

  

0.003

 

0.006

 Positive

    

4.00 (1.49–10.75)

 

 Negative

      

Nine patients (30.0%) with LVI demonstrated stage progression, as did 7 patients (8.1%) without LVI. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in the LVI-positive group had a higher risk of stage progression, with the 5-year progression-free survival rate being 61.8% in LVI-positive patients and 90.4% in LVI-negative patients (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that LVI had an independent influence on progression-free survival (p = 0.006, HR = 4.00).

Predictors of recurrence and stage progression in patients treated with BCG

We performed a subgroup analysis of the 85 patients who received BCG therapy. Their clinicopathological characteristics are listed in Table 3. There were no significant differences of clinical features between the LVI-positive and LVI-negative patients. We investigated whether LVI had a prognostic impact on tumor recurrence and stage progression (Table 4). Among the 85 patients, LVI was confirmed in 24 patients (28.2%). In the LVI-positive group, 13 patients (54.2%) experienced recurrence and 7 patients (29.2%) showed stage progression, while the corresponding numbers in the LVI-negative group were 16 (26.2%) and 5 (8.2%), respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the 5-year recurrence-free and progression-free survival rates of LVI-positive patients were 39.5% and 65.9%, respectively, which were significantly lower than those of LVI-negative patients (71.2% and 90.8%, p = 0.032 and 0.015, respectively; Figs. 3 and 4). Multivariate analysis confirmed that LVI had an independent influence on recurrence-free and progression-free survival in T1 NMIBC patients treated with BCG (p = 0.036 and 0.024, HR = 2.19 and 3.76, respectively).
Table 3

Clinicopathological characteristics of 85 BCG-treated patients stratified according to LVI status

Characteristic

Total

LVI positive

LVI negative

P value

No. of patients

85

 

24

 

61

  

Age

      

0.074

 <70 years

45

(52.9%)

9

(37.5%)

36

(59.0%)

 

 ≥70 years

40

(47.1%)

15

(62.5%)

25

(41.0%)

 

Sex

      

0.174

 Male

71

(83.5%)

22

(91.7%)

49

(80.3%)

 

 Female

14

(16.5%)

2

(8.3%)

12

(19.7%)

 

Tumor grade

      

0.258

 G1/2

4

(4.7%)

0

(0.0%)

4

(6.6%)

 

 G3

81

(95.3%)

24

(100.0%)

57

(93.4%)

 

Concomitant CIS

      

0.969

 Positive

21

(24.7%)

6

(25.0%)

15

(24.6%)

 

 Negative

64

(75.3%)

18

(75.0%)

46

(75.4%)

 

Multifocality

      

0.905

 Multiple

61

(71.8%)

17

(70.8%)

44

(72.1%)

 

 Solitary

24

(28.2%)

7

(29.2%)

17

(27.9%)

 

History of Ta NMIBC

      

0.563

 Recurrence

5

(5.9%)

1

(4.2%)

4

(6.6%)

 

 Primary

80

(94.1%)

23

(95.8%)

57

(93.4%)

 
Table 4

Results of univariate and multivariate analyses in patients treated with BCG after TURBT

Characteristic

Recurrence-free survival

Progression-free survival

Univariate

Multivariate

Univariate

Multivariate

p value

HR (95% CI)

p value

p value

HR (95% CI)

p value

Age

0.095

  

0.523

  

 <70 years

      

 ≥70 years

      

Sex

0.677

  

0.491

  

 Male

      

 Female

      

Tumor grade

0.593

  

0.424

  

 G1/2

      

 G3

      

Concomitant CIS

0.728

  

0.943

  

 Positive

      

 Negative

      

Multifocality

0.064

  

0.250

  

 Single

      

 Multiple

      

History of Ta NMIBC

0.694

  

0.079

  

 Recurrence

      

 Primary

      

Lymphovascular invasion

0.032

 

0.036

0.015

 

0.024

 Positive

 

2.19 (1.05–4.55)

  

3.76 (1.19–11.90)

 

 Negative

      
Fig. 3

Recurrence-free survival rate according to LVI status in patients treated with BCG

Fig. 4

Progression-free survival rate according to LVI status in patients treated with BCG

Association of LVI status with cancer-specific survival and overall survival

Among 16 patients with stage progression, 7 underwent total cystectomy, 3 were treated with radiation therapy, and 1 received systemic chemotherapy. Five patients received no treatment at their request. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate of LVI-negative patients was 96.3%, which was marginally higher than that of LVI-positive patients (79.8%, p = 0.07). The 5-year overall survival rate of LVI-negative patients was 89.4%, which was not significantly different from that of LVI-positive patients (71.8%, p = 0.185). In the patients treated with BCG, LVI status was not associated with either cancer-specific survival or overall survival (p = 0.143 and 0.235, respectively).

Discussion

Our study of 116 patients with T1 NMIBC revealed that LVI was significantly associated with stage progression after TURBT. In addition, we confirmed that LVI positivity was an independent risk factor for tumor recurrence and progression in T1 NMIBC patients treated with intravesical BCG instillation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that LVI in TURBT specimens is significantly associated with recurrence and stage progression of T1 NMIBC after treatment with BCG.

T1 NMIBC has a high potential for recurrence, and some patients experience stage progression that requires more aggressive therapy such as total cystectomy. Therefore, it is critical to identify the subset of T1 NMIBC patients whose tumors are highly malignant and have the potential to progress to muscle invasive disease. Various biological markers (such as p16, pRb, p53, MIB-1, and HSP90) have been studied for identifying aggressive T1 tumors [2729], but these are relatively expensive and require additional procedures for histopathological analysis. In contrast, LVI can easily be investigated during standard histopathological evaluation.

Several investigators have already investigated whether the LVI status of TURBT specimens was a prognostic factor in patients with NMIBC. Lopez et al. [23] reported an LVI positivity rate of 10% (17/170 T1 NMIBC patients) in their series and found that the LVI status was associated with overall survival. However, their patients were collected from 1983 to 1990 and were treated by adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy (mitomycin C or Adriamycin). Also, they did not determine the predictive value of LVI status for recurrence or stage progression by multivariate analysis. Andius et al. [24] analyzed 121 patients with T1 NMIBC, and found an association between LVI status and stage progression as well as cancer-specific survival. The same pathologist reviewed all histopathological material, as was done in our study, and LVI was confirmed in 12 patients (10%). In multivariate analysis, LVI was associated with both stage progression and cancer-specific survival. However, TURBT was performed between 1987 and 1988 in their study, and only one patient received adjuvant BCG instillation. Conflicting results with regard to the predictive value of LVI status for a poor clinical outcome have been reported in the era when BCG was established as standard adjuvant therapy for T1 NMIBC. Cho et al. [25] reviewed 118 patients with T1 NMIBC who underwent TURBT between 2001 and 2007, and evaluated the impact of LVI on tumor recurrence, stage progression, and metastasis. Two independent uro-pathologists reviewed the slides and found 33 LVI-positive patients (28%). Their multivariate analysis showed that LVI was significantly associated with tumor recurrence and stage progression, but the study population had a low rate of BCG instillation (22.9%). Branchereau et al. [26] assessed the prognostic value of LVI in 108 patients with high grade T1 NMIBC, including 60 patients (57%) who received adjuvant BCG therapy after TURBT. They reported that LVI was not associated with tumor recurrence, stage progression, cancer-specific survival, or overall survival. In contrast, we clearly demonstrated that LVI status could independently predict recurrence and stage progression in T1 NMIBC patients receiving BCG therapy and that evaluation of LVI in tumor specimens could provide useful information planning the appropriate management strategy and patient counseling.

In the present series, the LVI status was only described for 54 patients (46.6%) in the original pathology reports. Among the remaining 62 patients (53.4%), a further 13 LVI-positive cases were found after review by our uro-pathologist. At our institution, some pathologists routinely evaluate LVI, while others do not mention the LVI status. One of the reasons for this difference might be that the predictive role of LVI status in TURBT specimens has not been established clinically, especially for T1 NMIBC. Berman et al. evaluated 2802 patients with muscle invasive bladder tumors treated by total cystectomy using the Ontario cancer registry dataset and found that pathology reports failed to address LVI status in 25%, with LVI reporting rates being significantly higher at the high volume centers for total cystectomy [30]. They concluded that assessment of LVI status in a standardized manner across all bladder specimens by pathologists is essential to improve the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for this cancer. Our findings indicated that urologists and pathologists should share information concerning the prognostic significance of LVI, even in T1 NMIBC, emphasizing the importance of assessing and reporting LVI.

The present study had several limitations, including a small number of patients initially diagnosed with T1 bladder cancer and the long study period of 20 years, which was likely to have led to the low repeat TURBT rate (18.1%). Furthermore, we did not routinely perform maintenance BCG therapy in patients initially diagnosed with T1 bladder cancer and treatment after TURBT was not uniform. While 85 patients (73.3%) were treated with BCG, others received intravesical chemotherapy (13.8%) or no adjuvant therapy (12.9%). Therefore, we performed a subgroup analysis of the patients who received BCG therapy, which revealed that LVI status was an independent predictor of recurrence and stage progression in these patients. Since this study was retrospective, we cannot exclude the possibility of unknown biases, but we believe that consistent pathological data was obtained because the same uro-pathologist reviewed all of the specimens.

Conclusions

The presence of LVI is a strong risk factor for tumor recurrence and stage progression in T1 NMIBC patients treated with BCG. This finding might assist in the development of appropriate management and counseling strategies for T1 NMIBC patients. Urologists and pathologists should be aware of the prognostic significance of LVI in T1 disease.

Abbreviations

NMIBC: 

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

BCG: 

Bacillus Calmette-Guérin

CIS: 

Carcinoma in situ

TURBT: 

Transurethral resection of bladder tumor

LVI: 

Lymphovascular invasion

HR: 

Hazard ratio

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the staff of the Department of Urology and the Division of Diagnostic Pathology at Keio University School of Medicine. This work was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [KAKENHI Grant Number 15K20107].

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine
(2)
Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine

References

  1. Babjuk M, Burger M, Zigeuner R, Shariat SF, van Rhijn BW, Comperat E, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2013. Eur Urol. 2013;64(4):639–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Hemdan T, Johansson R, Jahnson S, Hellstrom P, Tasdemir I, Malmstrom PU, et al. 5-Year outcome of a randomized prospective study comparing bacillus Calmette-Guerin with epirubicin and interferon-alpha2b in patients with T1 bladder cancer. J Urol. 2014;191(5):1244–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Palou J, Sylvester RJ, Faba OR, Parada R, Pena JA, Algaba F, et al. Female gender and carcinoma in situ in the prostatic urethra are prognostic factors for recurrence, progression, and disease-specific mortality in T1G3 bladder cancer patients treated with bacillus Calmette-Guerin. Eur Urol. 2012;62(1):118–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Lebret T, Neuzillet Y. Indication and timing of cystectomy in high-risk bladder cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2012;22(5):427–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hautmann RE, Volkmer BG, Gust K. Quantification of the survival benefit of early versus deferred cystectomy in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (T1 G3). World J Urol. 2009;27(3):347–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Denzinger S, Fritsche HM, Otto W, Blana A, Wieland WF, Burger M. Early versus deferred cystectomy for initial high-risk pT1G3 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: do risk factors define feasibility of bladder-sparing approach? Eur Urol. 2008;53(1):146–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Roghmann F, Trinh QD, Braun K, von Bodman C, Brock M, Noldus J, et al. Standardized assessment of complications in a contemporary series of European patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Int J Urol. 2014;21(2):143–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernandez-Gomez J, Solsona E, Unda M, Martinez-Pineiro L, Gonzalez M, Hernandez R, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with bacillus Calmette-Guerin: multivariate analysis of data from four randomized CUETO trials. Eur Urol. 2008;53(5):992–1001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Joudi FN, Smith BJ, O’Donnell MA, Konety BR. The impact of age on the response of patients with superficial bladder cancer to intravesical immunotherapy. J Urol. 2006;175(5):1634–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Denzinger S, Otto W, Fritsche HM, Roessler W, Wieland WF, Hartmann A, et al. Bladder sparing approach for initial T1G3 bladder cancer: do multifocality, size of tumor or concomitant carcinoma in situ matter? A long-term analysis of 132 patients. Int J Urol. 2007;14(11):995–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kakiashvili DM, van Rhijn BW, Trottier G, Jewett MA, Fleshner NE, Finelli A, et al. Long-term follow-up of T1 high-grade bladder cancer after intravesical bacille Calmette-Guerin treatment. BJU Int. 2011;107(4):540–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Lodde M, Mian C, Mayr R, Comploj E, Trenti E, Melotti R, et al. Recurrence and progression in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: Prognostic models including multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization molecular grading. Int J Urol. 2014;21(10):968–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Mollberg NM, Bennette C, Howell E, Backhus L, Devine B, Ferguson MK. Lymphovascular invasion as a prognostic indicator in stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97(3):965–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Rakha EA, Martin S, Lee AH, Morgan D, Pharoah PD, Hodi Z, et al. The prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2012;118(15):3670–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Lim SB, Yu CS, Jang SJ, Kim TW, Kim JH, Kim JC. Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in sporadic colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(4):377–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim SH, Yang HK, Moon KC, Lee ES. Localized non-conventional renal cell carcinoma: prediction of clinical outcome according to histology. Int J Urol. 2014;21(4):359–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheng L, Jones TD, Lin H, Eble JN, Zeng G, Carr MD, et al. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Urol. 2005;174(6):2181–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Fujita K, Tanigawa G, Imamura R, Nakagawa M, Hayashi T, Kishimoto N, et al. Preoperative serum sodium is associated with cancer-specific survival in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated by nephroureterectomy. Int J Urol. 2013;20(6):594–601.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Seisen T, Colin P, Hupertan V, Yates DR, Xylinas E, Nison L, et al. Post-operative nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with localized and/or locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma without metastasis. BJU Int. 2014;114(5):733–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Albers P, Albrecht W, Algaba F, Bokemeyer C, Cohn-Cedermark G, Fizazi K, et al. EAU guidelines on testicular cancer: 2011 update. Eur Urol. 2011;60(2):304–19.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Palapattu GS, Lotan Y, Rogers CG, Amiel GE, et al. Outcomes of radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a contemporary series from the Bladder Cancer Research Consortium. J Urol. 2006;176(6 Pt 1):2414–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Shariat SF, Svatek RS, Tilki D, Skinner E, Karakiewicz PI, Capitanio U, et al. International validation of the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in patients treated with radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2010;105(10):1402–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Lopez JI, Angulo JC. The prognostic significance of vascular invasion in stage T1 bladder cancer. Histopathology. 1995;27(1):27–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Andius P, Johansson SL, Holmang S. Prognostic factors in stage T1 bladder cancer: tumor pattern (solid or papillary) and vascular invasion more important than depth of invasion. Urology. 2007;70(4):758–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Cho KS, Seo HK, Joung JY, Park WS, Ro JY, Han KS, et al. Lymphovascular invasion in transurethral resection specimens as predictor of progression and metastasis in patients with newly diagnosed T1 bladder urothelial cancer. J Urol. 2009;182(6):2625–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Branchereau J, Larue S, Vayleux B, Karam G, Bouchot O, Rigaud J. Prognostic value of the lymphovascular invasion in high-grade stage pT1 bladder cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2013;11(2):182–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Sato M, Yanai H, Morito T, Oda W, Shin-no Y, Yamadori I, et al. Association between the expression pattern of p16, pRb and p53 and the response to intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy in patients with urothelial carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder. Pathol Int. 2011;61(8):456–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Lebret T, Becette V, Herve JM, Molinie V, Barre P, Lugagne PM, et al. Prognostic value of MIB-1 antibody labeling index to predict response to Bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy in a high-risk selected population of patients with stage T1 grade G3 bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2000;37(6):654–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Lebret T, Watson RW, Molinie V, Poulain JE, O’Neill A, Fitzpatrick JM, et al. HSP90 expression: a new predictive factor for BCG response in stage Ta-T1 grade 3 bladder tumours. Eur Urol. 2007;51(1):161–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Berman DM, Kawashima A, Peng Y, Mackillop WJ, Siemens DR, Booth CM. Reporting trends and prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma: a population-based study. Int J Urol. 2014;22(2):163–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Fukumoto et al. 2016

Advertisement