Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Urology

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Predictors of survival outcomes in native sub Saharan black men newly diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer

BMC UrologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:39

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0228-0

Received: 11 November 2016

Accepted: 23 May 2017

Published: 30 May 2017

Abstract

Background

Though it is well established that black men are at higher risk of prostate cancer (PCa) very little is known about the disease in native sub Saharan black men. Newly diagnosed metastatic PCa patients treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy were identified and predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) assessed.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with metastatic PCa between 2010 and 2015 in a sub Saharan black population were included in the study. Primary outcome measure was PFS defined as time from primary androgen deprivation therapy to clinical progression or death. Demographic, clinical and PSA kinetic variables were evaluated for their prognostic power using Cox proportional hazard regression models.

Results

Seventy-nine patients met the eligibility criteria and were analyzed. Median age, median overall survival and PFS was 69 years, 40 months and 27 months respectively. A PSA nadir >4 ng/mL was found to predict an earlier clinical progression. Median PFS was shorter in those with PSA nadir >4 ng/mL (15 months) compared to those with PSA nadir ≤4 ng/mL (29 months); log rank p value = 0.003.

Conclusions

The PSA nadir achieved following primary androgen deprivation therapy predicts progression-free survival in sub Saharan black men newly diagnosed with metastatic PCa. PSA nadir >4 ng/mL was found to be associated with a more rapid clinical progression.

Keywords

Prostate cancerAndrogen deprivation therapyPSA kineticsPSA nadirBlack menSub Saharan Africa

Background

Although the exact burden of Prostate cancer (PCa) in sub Saharan Africa remains largely unknown [1]; the region is home to the largest populations of black men, a well-established high risk group for PCa. Unfortunately, despite this, very little is known about the basic and clinical aspects of the disease in these native black men. This is probably due to weak health systems, poor cancer registries and a hostile research environment with poor funding [2]. In the few studies that are available, findings have supported the widely-held view that significantly higher proportion of men in the region present late with advanced disease compared to most other regions of the world [3]. This may be attributable to a near lack of any established systematic screening practices in the region during the early PSA era when PCa screening was encouraged up to current times when population screening has become controversial. In our practice, well over half of newly diagnosed patients have locally advanced or metastatic disease.

Primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT) is the most widely used and most potent systemic treatment for newly diagnosed hormone sensitive metastatic PCa. It is probably the most common form of treatment for PCa received by black men of sub Saharan Africa largely due to the much higher proportion of men with advanced disease. PADT is often in the form of bilateral orchiectomy with or without antiandrogens for the majority of these men mainly due to cost considerations as health insurance coverage are generally low. Despite PADT, most men progress biochemically and clinically eventually to castrate resistant disease and or death. Wide variability in clinical progression of metastatic PCa has been observed and though certain demographic, PSA kinetic and histopathological markers have been reported to be associated with higher mortality risk, most of the studies were done with moderate to fair representation of black men generally but scarcely inclusive of any native sub Saharan black men [47]. There is thus a need to determine surrogate markers of aggressive progressive disease and impaired survival in our very peculiar and under studied high risk population. This retrospective study queried the clinical records of post-PADT native black men newly diagnosed with metastatic disease to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and determine possible early surrogate markers of rapidly progressive disease. Although OS is the standard endpoint in survival analysis, PFS is also a relevant endpoint in the setting of metastatic PCa as patients often eventually die of disease progression.

Methods

This cohort was generated from clinical records of newly diagnosed black men with metastatic PCa who presented for care at a tertiary care hospital in North Central Nigeria, West Africa between June 2010 and July 2015. To be eligible for inclusion in the study, patients must have had metastatic bone disease confirmed with radiological investigations and subsequently agreed to androgen deprivation therapy (orchiectomy or luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone with or without anti androgens). Patients would also have had a pretreatment PSA and at least 2 post treatment PSA readings done less than 12 months’ post androgen deprivation therapy with at least one assay between the third and eighth month. Patients who had prior primary surgery (prostatectomy) or radiotherapy were excluded from the study. Demographic and clinical information retrieved include age, use of Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), pretreatment PSA, PSA decline, Post treatment PSA nadir and Gleason score. Post treatment PSA nadir was defined as the lowest PSA reported during the first 12 months following androgen deprivation therapy. PSA decline was defined as the relative change of PSA nadir from baseline (pretreatment PSA). This study’s primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS). PFS was defined as time from commencement of androgen deprivation therapy to clinical progression or censure. Clinical progression was defined as a composite outcome of the occurrence of new metastases or skeletal related events or death from PCa. Categorical and continuous variables were summarized using percentages and medians (interquartile range) respectively. Univariate logistic and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models with backward elimination were used to explore the impact of potential predictors. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with significance determined by log rank test. All analyses were performed with SPSS software, version 22.0 (SPSS Inc), p value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Institutional ethics board approval was obtained for the study.

Results

Seventy-nine patients met the eligibility criteria and were analyzed. The baseline characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. The median age and pretreatment PSA at diagnosis were 69 years (IQR: 65 – 73 years) and 94 ng/mL (IQR: 50 – 124 ng/mL) respectively. Majority of the men 65(82.3%) had orchiectomy with or without anti androgens. The median PSA nadir was 4 ng/mL (IQR: 1.0 – 9.0 ng/mL) and 60 (75.9%) patients achieved a PSA decline of ≥ 90%. The median time from PADT to PSA nadir was 7 months (IQR: 5-8). The median OS and PFS was 40.3 months (95%CI 24.3-49.7 months) and 26.8 months (95% 19.1 – 28.9 months) respectively. After a median follow-up of 15 months (IQR: 12 – 24 months) clinical progression was documented in 35 (44.3%) patients and of these 19 (23.8%) died. Prognosticators of clinical progression found on univariate analysis (Table 2) were analgesic consumption (NSAID use) and PSA nadir. Pretreatment PSA and PSA decline were not significant prognosticators; waterfall plots (Fig. 1) of PSA decline for patients with (A) and without (B) clinical progression during study follow-up show that a decline of ≥ 90% was not significantly different in both groups (p = 0.06). PSA nadir was dichotomized at median (4 ng/mL) and this was also found to be predictive. On multivariate analysis (Table 2), only PSA nadir remained as statistically significant predictor with reduced PFS apparent in patients with PSA nadir >4 ng/mL (HR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.06-7.67). Kaplan Meier plot of PFS by PSA nadir (Fig. 2) illustrated the differences between the two survival distributions (PSA nadir ≤4 ng/mL versus PSA nadir >4 ng/mL) with the median PFS for patients with PSA nadir ≤4 ng/mL of 29 months (95%CI 19.3 – 38.7) significantly longer than that of those with PSA nadir >4 ng/mL which was found to be 15 months (95%CI 8.3 – 21.7), log-rank p-value = 0.003.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of study cohort (n = 79)

Variables

n (%)

mediana(IQR)

Age

 

69.0 (65.0 – 73.0)

Place of residence

 Urban

56 (70.9)

 

 Rural

23 (29.1)

 

Initial Clinical presentation

 LUTS

69 (87.3)

 

bNSAID use

51 (64.6)

 

 Anaemia (<10 g/dL)

25 (31.6)

 

PADT received

  

 Orchiectomy

65(82.3)

 

 LH-RH analogues

14 (17.7)

 

PSA kinetics

 Pre-treatment PSA(ng/mL)

 

94.0 (50.0 – 124.0)

 PSA nadir (ng/mL)

 

4.0 (1.0 – 9.0)

 PSA decline

  

   ≥ 90%

60 (75.9)

 

   < 90%

19 (24.1)

 

Biopsy Gleason score

 3 + 3

24 (30.4)

 

 3 + 4

10 (12.7)

 

 4 + 3

20 (25.3)

 

  ≥ 8

25 (31.7)

 

aInterquartile range, bNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Table 2

Cox proportional hazards models for progression-free survival following primary androgen deprivation therapy

Variables

Univariate

Multivariate

HR

95% CI

p

HR

95% CI

p

Age

1.01

0.96-1.06

0.706

   

Urban residence

1.44

0.59-3.48

0.421

   

LUTS

2.15

0.70-6.57

0.181

   

aNSAID use

3.80

1.43-10.10

0.007

3.40

0.74-15.66

0.117

Anaemia

1.89

0.77-4.64

0.162

   

Pretreatment PSA

1.00

0.99-1.01

0.913

   

PSA decline

   < 90%

1.00 (Reference)

   

   ≥ 90%

0.36

0.13-1.10

0.063

   

aPSA nadir

  ≤ 4 ng/mL

1.00 (Reference)

   

  > 4 ng/mL

3.86

1.49-10.04

0.006

2.85

1.06-7.67

0.038

Biopsy Gleason score

 6

1.00 (Reference)

   

 7

0.82

0.35-1.91

0.648

   

 8-10

1.26

0.56-2.80

0.579

   

asignificant at univariate analysis and carried onward to multivariate analysis

Fig. 1

Waterfall plots of relative PSA decline from baseline for patients with (a) and without (b) clinical progression during study follow-up (median 15 months). A decline of ≥90% was seen in 23 (65.7%) and 37 (84.1%) patients in (a) and (b) respectively. This was not statistically significant (p = 0.06). The bold reference line represents PSA decline of 90%

Fig. 2

Progression-free survival probability of patients with metastatic prostate cancer following primary androgen deprivation therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences between patients with PSA nadir ≤4 ng/mL Vs > 4 ng/mL, log-rank p-value = 0.003

Discussion

In sub Saharan Africa, urologists are often faced with the dilemma of how to interpret prostate cancer guidelines mostly derived with suboptimal representation of black men (and scarcely any native sub-Saharan African men). This problem is compounded by the dearth of research on the basic and clinical aspects of PCa from sub Saharan Africa and the weak healthcare system of the region which offers fewer options in the treatment of PCa. The resulting knowledge gap is particularly remarkable taking to consideration the high-risk status of the population and the fact that a large majority of native African black men currently present with aggressive disease and at a late stage with metastases [3, 8, 9]. As observed in other populations, wide variability exists in the clinical course of metastatic PCa in sub Saharan African men. This study of a cohort of sub Saharan African men thus examined the role of some demographic and clinical (including PSA kinetics) variables in predicting clinical progression following PADT.

Median age of our study cohort was 69 years which is similar to that found in similarly studied sub Saharan African populations [3, 8, 9]. There are no available studies of sub Saharan black men that evaluated the relationship between age and survival for comparison with this study. However, a study carried out in the United States, in which African Americans formed 10% of the study population found that the prognostic power of age though significant at univariate analysis was lost at multivariate analysis that controlled for treatment modality [4]. This suggests that where treatments are similar survival outcomes would probably not be different across age groups. Another study from the same region in which blacks were about one-sixth of the study population found that younger men, who were more likely to be black, were at higher risk of all cause and cancer specific death [5]. This could be interpreted to mean that young black men were more likely to die than other groups. This current study done exclusively in native black men of sub Saharan Africa found no such relationship though it investigated the broader outcome of PFS; and it corroborates Koff et al. findings of no relationships between age, race and PFS [10]. NSAID use was found to be associated with decreased PFS at univariate analysis in this study but this association was lost when PSA nadir was included in multivariate analysis. About two-thirds of the patients studied required analgesia for pains related to metastasis. No association was found between Gleason score and PFS in this study.

While pretreatment PSA, PSA velocity and Gleason score have been found to be important predictors of response to therapy and survival in the setting of localized disease [11, 12]; alkaline phosphatase, PSA nadir and time to PSA nadir, PSA half-life have been reported to predict survival following PADT for advanced or metastatic disease [6, 7, 10, 1317]. The importance of these variables has never been investigated in a native African black population. While many studies have reported that lower PSA nadir reflects a good prognosis with slower clinical progression, there are no agreed values of optimum PSA nadir above which prognosis worsens. Reported values include 0.1 ng/mL, 0.2 ng/mL, 2 ng/mL and 4 ng/mL [7, 10, 13, 15]; these different values may be attributable to the dissimilar cohorts studied. Some cohorts included patients who had prior treatment with curative intent (prostatectomy or radiotherapy), some included only newly diagnosed metastatic PCa patients while others included a mix of patients with localized, locally advanced or metastatic disease. This current study includes only newly diagnosed metastatic PCa patients and found that a PSA nadir >4 ng/mL was associated with earlier clinical progression; this is similar to findings of Hussain et al. in their study cohort of metastatic PCa patients who were treated with 7-month “induction” course of Goserelin and bicalutamide [7]. Hussain et al. assessed for OS and found a median OS of 13 months for patients with PSA nadir of more than 4 ng/mL which was significantly differently from those in their cohort with PSA less than 4 ng/mL or less than 0.2 ng/mL [7]. In contrast, the current study assessed PFS (clinical progression and or death as endpoints) and found a PFS of 15 months in cohort members with PSA nadir >4 ng/mL which was significantly less than the PFS of 29 months found in those with PSA nadir ≤4 ng/mL. Unlike PSA nadir, evaluations of the prognostic value of time to PSA nadir (TTN) have produced inconsistent results [6, 14, 1618]. Both shorter and longer TTN have been found to be associated with worse outcomes. These varied results may be due to dissimilar cohorts or inappropriate statistical analysis; more frequent PSA measurements done at similar intervals would be required for appropriate analysis of TTN. This was unavailable in the current study and TTN was not analyzed.

There are some important limitations to this study. Admittedly it is a retrospective study and cohort size is not large. Additionally, predictors of PFS and not OS were assessed because of the relatively few events (deaths) that occurred during the study period. Despite these limitations, this is the first study to report on the predictors of clinical progression in native sub Saharan African black men with metastatic PCa. Findings from this study may help identify patients likely to develop early clinical progression and these patients may benefit from early commencement of other therapies aimed at delaying clinical progression and prolonging survival. In our resource-limited setting, patients commonly receive chemohormonal therapy with docetaxel added to PADT following clinical progression to castrate-resistant PCa. The high costs associated with newer drugs, abiraterone and enzalutamide, make them out-of-reach for patients in our low- and middle- income region where payments for health care are mainly out-of-pocket and health insurance coverage is low.

Conclusions

The PSA nadir achieved following primary androgen deprivation therapy predicts progression-free survival in sub Saharan black men newly diagnosed with metastatic PCa. PSA nadir >4 ng/mL was found to be associated with a more rapid clinical progression.

Abbreviations

NSAID: 

Non-Steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

OS: 

Overall survival

PADT: 

Primary androgen deprivation therapy

PCa: 

Prostate cancer

PFS: 

Progression-free survival

PSA: 

Prostate-specific antigen

TTN: 

Time to PSA nadir

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Mr. Joshua helped in retrieving the records of patients.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

JOB collated the Data used, performed the Data analysis, wrote and approved the manuscript.

Competing interests

The author declares that there are no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the UITH Institutional Ethics Board.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital

References

  1. Adeloye D, David RA, Aderemi AV, Iseolorunkanmi A, Oyedokun A, Iweala EE, et al. An Estimate of the Incidence of Prostate Cancer in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153496.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bello JO. Urological research in sub-Saharan Africa: a retrospective cohort study of abstracts presented at the Nigerian Association of Urological Surgeons conferences. BMC Urol. 2013;13:59.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Zeigler-Johnson CM, Rennert H, Mittal RD, Jalloh M, Sachdeva R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Evaluation of prostate cancer characteristics in four populations worldwide. Can J Urol. 2008;15(3):4056–64.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bechis SK, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR. Impact of age at diagnosis on prostate cancer treatment and survival. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(2):235–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lin DW, Porter M, Montgomery B. Treatment and survival outcomes in young men diagnosed with prostate cancer: a Population-based Cohort Study. Cancer. 2009;115(13):2863–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Choueiri TK, Xie W, D’Amico AV, Ross RW, Hu JC, Pomerantz M, et al. Time to PSA nadir independently predicts overall survival in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy. Cancer. 2009;115(5):981–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Hussain M, Tangen CM, Higano C, Schelhammer PF, Faulkner J, Crawford ED, et al. Absolute prostate-specific antigen value after androgen deprivation is a strong independent predictor of survival in new metastatic prostate cancer: data from Southwest Oncology Group Trial 9346 (INT-0162). J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(24):3984–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Tindall EA, Monare LR, Petersen DC, van Zyl S, Hardie RA, Segone AM, et al. Clinical presentation of prostate cancer in black South Africans. Prostate. 2014;74(8):880–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Kirakoya B, Hounnasso PP, Pare AK, Mustapha AB, Zango B. Clinico-pathological features of prostate cancer at the University hospital Yalgado Ouedraogo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2014;4(4):70–81.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Koff SG, Connelly RR, Bauer JJ, McLeod DG, Moul JW. Primary hormonal therapy for prostate cancer: experience with 135 consecutive PSA-ERA patients from a tertiary care military medical center. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2002;5(2):152–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooperberg MR, Pasta DJ, Elkin EP, Litwin MS, Latini DM, Du Chane J, et al. The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005;173(6):1938–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. D'Amico AV, Renshaw AA, Sussman B, Chen MH. Pretreatment PSA Velocity and Risk of Death from Prostate Cancer Following External Beam Radiation Therapy. JAMA. 2005;294(4):440–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tomioka A, Tanaka N, Yoshikawa M, Miyake M, Anai S, Chihara Y, et al. Nadir PSA level and time to nadir PSA are prognostic factors in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. BMC Urol. 2014;14:33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Sasaki T, Onishi T, Hoshina A. Nadir PSA level and time to PSA nadir following primary androgen deprivation therapy are the early survival predictors for prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2011;14(3):248–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Stewart AJ, Scher HI, Chen MH, McLeod DG, Carroll PR, Moul JW, et al. Prostate-specific antigen nadir and cancer-specific mortality following hormonal therapy for prostate-specific antigen failure. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(27):6556–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim KH, Han KS, Kim KH, Kim DK, Koo KC, Rha KH, et al. The prognostic effect of prostate-specific antigen half-life at the first follow-up visit in newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Urol Oncol. 2015;33(9):383.e17–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Hong SY, Cho DS, Kim SI, Ahn HS, Kim SJ. Prostate-specific antigen nadir and time to prostate-specific antigen nadir following maximal androgen blockade independently predict prognosis in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Kor J Urol. 2012;53(9):607–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Chung CS, Chen MH, Cullen J, McLeod D, Carroll P, D'Amico AV. Time to prostate-specific antigen nadir after androgen suppression therapy for postoperative or postradiation PSA failure and risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality. Urology. 2008;71(1):136–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement