Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Urology

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Should manual detorsion be a routine part of treatment in testicular torsion?

  • Arif Demirbas1Email author,
  • Demirhan Orsan Demir1,
  • Erim Ersoy1,
  • Mucahit Kabar1,
  • Serkan Ozcan1,
  • Mehmet Ali Karagoz1,
  • Ozgecan Demirbas2 and
  • Omer Gokhan Doluoglu1
BMC UrologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:84

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0276-5

Received: 7 December 2016

Accepted: 5 September 2017

Published: 15 September 2017

Abstract

Background

It was aimed to investigate the efficiency and reliability of the manual detorsion (MD) procedure in patients diagnosed with testicular torsion (TT).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made of the data of 57 patients diagnosed with TT, comprising 20 patients with successful MD (Group I), 28 patients who underwent emergency orchiopexy (Group II), and 9 patients applied with orchiectomy (Group III). The groups were compared in respect of age, and duration of pain. The success rate of MD, the time of testicular fixation (TF), any problems encountered in follow-up, and follow-up times were analyzed in Group I. Data were analyzed with P-P pilot, Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal Wallis and Chi-square tests. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

MD was successful and detorsion could be achieved in 20 of 26 patients. The groups were similar in respect of age (p = 0.217). The median duration of pain was 3 (1–8), 4 (1–72), and 48 (12–144) hours in Groups I, II, and III, respectively, and determined as similar in Groups I and II (p = 0.257), although a statistically significant difference was determined between the 3 groups (p < 0.001). TF was applied to Group I after median 10 (0–45) days, and no parenchymal disorder was determined in the median follow-up period of 21.5 (2–40) months.

Conclusion

MD that can be easily and immediately performed after the diagnosis of TT decreases ischemia time. This seems to be an efficient and reliable procedure when applied together with elective orchiopexy, as a part of the treatment.

Keywords

Testicular torsionManual detorsionOrchiopexyOrchiectomy

Background

Testicular (spermatic cord) torsion (TT), which was first described by Hunter, is an emergency urological diagnosis that results in ischemic organ injury in the affected testis, and requires urgent diagnosis and treatment [1, 2]. Cold weather, activation of the cremasteric reflex, trauma, undescended testis, and fast enlargement of testis during puberty are the known risk factors in susceptible individuals. It shows a bimodal distribution, and peaks in the neonatal period and puberty. Prevalence has been reported as 8.6/ 100,000 between the ages of 10 and 19 years in the United States [14].

With the exception of neonates, patients usually present with unilateral severe pain that has been present for a few hours [5, 6]. Pain is rarely mild, and it radiates to the inguinal region and abdomen. The most frequent physical examination findings are testicular tenderness and loss of the cremasteric reflex [1, 7]. An abnormal position of the testis is more common than other causes for acute scrotal pain [8]. Doppler ultrasonography (USG), scintigraphy, dynamic magnetic resonance (MR), and high-resolution USG are the diagnostic imaging modalities [3].

The most important factors for testicular salvage before it atrophies are known to be the duration between the onset of symptoms and detorsion, and the degree of the torsion [9, 10]. Emergency surgery after the diagnosis aims to shorten the duration of ischemia [1, 2, 11]. Manual detorsion (MD), as described by Nash, has been suggested before surgery to return blood flow faster, and some authors have indicated it as an alternative to surgery [1, 12, 13].

In this study, it was aimed to investigate the efficiency of MD, whether it could be a routine part of treatment or an alternative to surgery in patients with TT due to time saved by the application, and the reliability of elective orchiopexy rather than emergency orchiopexy in the light of information provided in literature.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made of a total of 57 patients admitted to our outpatient clinic or Emergency Department between 2011 and 2015 with acute scrotal pain, and who were diagnosed with TT based on physical examination findings and decreased or absent testicular blood flow on Doppler USG. The approval of the Local Ethics Committee was obtained before starting the study. The MD procedure was applied by three urologists in our clinic, and it was not performed by other urologists. Group I comprised 20 patients with successful MD, Group II comprised 28 patients who underwent emergency orchiopexy or orchiopexy after failure of MD, and Group III comprised 9 patients that had emergency scrotal exploration and orchiectomy. The patients in Group I had bilateral testicular fixation (TF) under elective conditions after MD, and the patients in Group II had bilateral TF during emergency orchiopexy.

The groups were compared in respect of age, and the time from onset of scrotal pain to admission to hospital (duration of pain). In Group I, the time of elective TF performed after MD and the number of the patients with a successful MD procedure were determined. In addition, the follow-up period, and the presence of testicular atrophy findings on Doppler USG were analyzed in Group I. The patients that had orchiopexy and orchiectomy (Groups II and III) were analyzed in respect of the time from onset of pain to the start of surgery in order to determine the gain in ischemia duration with MD compared to emergency scrotal exploration.

MD was performed without using any anesthesia technique to preserve the feeling of pain, in consideration of retorsion risk in the affected testis. The affected testis was rotated laterally for detorsion. However, when lateral rotation was not successful due to lateral TT, then medial rotation was applied [14]. The success of MD was defined as the immediate relief of symptoms and improvement of the physical examination findings, and the success was confirmed by normal testicular arterial and venous blood flow on Doppler USG, which was performed immediately after MD.

Patients in Group I and Group II were followed up with monthly physical examinations for the first 6 months after diagnosis and Doppler USG was applied at 3-month intervals. Subsequent follow-up was physical examinations at 6-month intervals.

The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of Declaration of Helsinki 2008.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis of data was performed using SPSS version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States) statistics software. Conformity to normal distribution of the data was analyzed with histogram and P-P pilot test. The Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis tests were used to compare continuous variables that did not show normal distribution. The Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

MD was performed in 26 patients diagnosed with TT. Successful MD was recorded in 20 (76%) patients, and 6 (24%) patients had emergency orchiopexy due to failure of MD. The ages of the patients were similar in all 3 groups (p = 0.217). The median duration of pain was 3 (1–8) hours in Group I, 4 (1–72) hours in Group II, and 48 (12–144) hours in Group III, with a significant difference determined between the groups (p < 0.001) (Table 1). The comparison of Groups I and II where testicular salvage could be achieved revealed that those groups were similar in respect of duration of pain (p = 0.257) (Table 2).
Table 1

The symptoms on admission in patients diagnosed with testicular torsion

 

Group I n = 20

Group II n = 28

Group III n = 9

p

Age

17.5

19.5

20

= 0.217

Duration of pain (hours, min-max)

3, 1–8

4, 1–72

48, 12–144

<0.001

Table 2

Comparison of duration of pain in the groups that had testicular salvage

 

Group I n = 20

Group II n = 28

p

Duration of pain (hours, min-max)

3, 1–8

4, 1–72

= 0.257

TF was performed under elective conditions at median 10 (0–45) days after MD in 18 of 20 patients. The other 2 patients, aged 45 and 36 years, respectively, were followed up without TF, as they did not accept the procedure. In the follow-up of these 2 patients, no painful episodes developed and no pathological findings were determined on physical examination or on Doppler USG. During the median follow-up period of 21.5 (2–40) months, none of the patients in Group I had atrophy or parenchymal disorders on physical examination or Doppler USG after MD and TF. No painful episode developed in any patient in the period up to elective orchiopexy. In the 6 patients applied with emergency orchiopexy due to unsuccessful MD, no testicular atrophy or other pathological findings were encountered. The median ischemia durations between diagnosis and scrotal exploration were 90 (20–240) and 80 (45–180) minutes in Groups II and III, respectively (p = 0.636) (Table 3).
Table 3

The time between diagnosis and scrotal exploration in patients that had orchiopexy or orchiectomy

 

Group II

n = 28

Group III

n = 9

p

The time between diagnosis and exploration (minutes, min-max)

90, 20–240

80, 45–180

0.636

Discussion

TT is regarded as a race against time, and the histological changes of testicular injury appear in hours, and even in minutes [13]. It has been reported that irreversible ischemic changes occur 4–6 h after ischemic scrotum, and that 80% of patients need orchiectomy due to necrosis after 24 h if the testis is not detorsioned [3, 14, 15]. Studies have also shown that the duration between onset of symptoms and treatment caused disturbances in semen quality through autoimmune mechanisms [16].

Emergency scrotal exploration has been recommended as the standard treatment method for derotation of the rotated spermatic cord, and restoration of testicular blood flow [13]. However, minutes and even hours may be needed to prepare for this emergency procedure. Our five-year experience showed there was a significant time loss between diagnosis and treatment (80–90 min, Table 3) and this was reflected in the ischemia time.

MD was first described in 1893. It was performed to restore blood flow and give rapid pain relief. The efficiency of the procedure has been investgated by various authors [1720]. Catolica [18] published the largest series with 34 patients, and reported that MD was successful in all patients, TF was performed under elective conditions in 6 patients, and the duration between urological consultation and surgery was between 1 h and 2 months in the 34 patients included in the study. The author also reported that retorsion was not evident in any of the patients, the ischemic testis was saved, and an emergency procedure became an elective procedure. A study from the Netherlands reported MD in 17 patients, 14 of which were successful, orchiopexy was performed electively (waiting time was mean 12 h, ranging from 2 h to 3 months), retorsion was not seen in any of the patients, and none of the patients had testicular atrophy after a mean follow-up period of 22 months. The procedure failed in 3 patients, and excessive scrotal edema and pain were considered to be responsible for this since no anesthesia was used to be able to determine “sudden relief of pain” that was used as the success criterion [20]. In a study by Sessions et al. [14], residual torsion was determined during orchiopexy in 17/53 (38%) patients who had been applied with manual detorsion and it was concluded that orchiopexy should not be delayed. However, as there are no studies of high level evidence on this subject in literature, whether orchiopexy should be applied electively or not following manual detorsion does not come under the heading of a recommendation.

In the current series of 26 patients, MD was successful in 20 (76%) patients at the time of diagnosis, and it was determined that testicular salvage was achieved after long term follow-up (median: 21.5 months). Attempting MD and success after the procedure made a significant time-saving compared to orchiopexy in respect of testicular ischaemia time (median: 90 min). In the development of testicular damage, as it is known that every minute is valuable, the median ischaemia-free time of 90 mins gained with MD, suggests that it is important in the treatment of TT [13]. Elective TF and the absence of any retorsion in this waiting period can be considered to show the safety of MD. However, even if it is wanted to apply TF immediately after MD, it can be considered necessary to apply it at the time of MD diagnosis. Even after diagnosis, the time of transporting the patient to the operating room and preoperative preparation means ‘a period with ischaemia’. A comparison was made of the patients that had MD and those with emergency orchiopexy (Group II) in order to determine the effect of the duration of torsion on the success of MD and no effect was observed.

Conclusion

MD is a non-invasive procedure, may be applied as soon as the diagnosis is made, decreases the duration of ischemia when compared to emergency scrotal exploration, and the long-termresults of this study have shown that it is safe when applied together with elective orchiopexy. MD is a simple procedure that may be performed safely with little to no delay in definite scrotal exploration and orchiopexy, which remains the gold standard.

Abbreviations

MD: 

Manual detorsion

TF: 

Testicular fixation

TT: 

Testicular torsion

Declarations

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its Additional file 1.

Authors’ contributions

Study concept and design: AD, DOD and OD Acquisition of data: MAK, MK, SO and AD Analysis and interpretation of data: OGD and EE Drafting of the manuscript: EE Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: EE Statistical analysis: OGD and O.D Administrative, technical, and material support: MAK, MK, SO and AD Study supervision: AD and DOD. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval was granted by the Local Ethics Committee before starting the study (Ankara Training and Research Hospital- Approval number:0615). Additional informed consent was not required by the ethics committee approving the study due to retrospective nature of study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Urology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital
(2)
Department of Pediatrics, Ankara Dr. Sami Ulus Women Health, Children’s Training and Research Hospital

References

  1. Kapoor S. Testicular torsion: a race against time. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62:821–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barthold JS. Abnormalities of the testes and scrotum and their surgical management. In: Wein AJ, editor. Campbell-Walsh urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders Elsevier; 2011. p. 3587–92.Google Scholar
  3. Tekgül S, Doğan HS, Erdem E, et al. Guidelines on pediatric urology. European Association of Urology. 2015:13–5.Google Scholar
  4. Cunningham RF. Familial occurrence of testicular torsion. JAMA. 1960;174:1330–1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. McAndrew HF, Pemberton R, Kikiros CS, et al. The incidence and investigation of acute scrotal problems in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2002;18:435–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sauvat F, Hennequin S, Slimane MAA, et al. Age for testicular torsion? Arch Pediatr. 2002;9:1226–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kadish HA, Bolte RG. A retrospective review of pediatric patients with epididymitis, testicular torsion, and torsion of testicular appendages. Pediatrics. 1998;102:73–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Makela E, Lahdes-Vasama T, Rajakorpi H, et al. A 19-year review of paediatric patients with acute scrotum. Scan J Surg. 2007;96:62–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Visser AJ, Heyns CF. Testicular function after torsion of the spermatic cord. BJU Int. 2003;92:200–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Tryfonas G, Violaki A, Tsikopoulos G, et al. Late postoperative results in males treated for testicular torsion during childhood. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29:553–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Murphy FL, Fletcher L, Pease P. Early scrotal exploration in all cases is the investigation and intervention of choice in the acute paediatric scrotum. Pediatr Surg Int. 2006;22:413–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nash WG. Acute torsion of the spermatic cord: reduction: immediate relief. Br Med J. 1893;1:742.Google Scholar
  13. Lee LM, Wright JE, McLoughlin MG. Testicular torsion in the adult. J Urol. 1983;130:93–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sessions AE, Rabinowitz R, Hulbert WC, et al. Testicular torsion: direction, degree, duration and disinformation. J Urol. 2003;169:663–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Anderson JB, Williamson RC. Testicular torsion in Bristol: a 25-year review. Br J Surg. 1988;75:988–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Anderson JB, Williamson RC. Fertility after torsion of the spermatic cord. BJU Int. 1990;65:225–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kiesling VJ, Schroeder DE, Pauljev P, et al. Spermatic cord block and manual reduction: primary treatment for spermatic cord torsion. J Urol. 1984;132:921–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Catolica EV. Preoperative manual detorsion of the torsed spermatic cord. J Urol. 1985;133:803–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Vordermark JS. Testicular torsion: management with ultrasonic Doppler flow detector. Urology. 1984;14:41–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Cornel EB, Karthaus HFM. Manual derotation of the twisted spermatic cord. BJU Int. 1999;83:672–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement