WT is the most common tumor of the urinary tract under the age of 15 [1]. Up to now, WT with IVC duplication has not been reported. The development of the IVC is a complex embryological process between weeks 6 and 10 of gestation, including the development, regression, anastomoses, and replacement of embryonic veins [2]. Double IVC is a rare anomaly, and occurs in 1.5% (range 0.2–3%) [3,4,5]. According to the caliber of the duplicated IVC and the preaortic trunk, IVC duplication has been classified into three types [4]. The classification may not be appropriate for the present case considering the notable changes of the caliber of the duplicated IVC before and after the operation. The compression of the right IVC caused by tumor resulted in the dominant venous drainage of the left IVC. After the tumornephrectomy, the right IVC gradually took over the venous drainage. Then the left IVC might start to regress and could not be detected at 3 months postoperative CT image. To our knowledge, this is the first detection of the postnatal regression of left IVC, which indicates that vena caval development might proceed not limited to the embryonic period.
Although IVC duplication is usually asymptomatic, it might have significant clinical implications. As an uncommon anomaly, the duplication of IVC can be misdiagnosed as a pathological lesion such as ureteric dilatation or lymphadenopathy on CT images. The left side of a double IVC might be interpreted erroneously as enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes [2, 6,7,8], which might induce preoperative overstaging by radiographic imaging in WT. Serious overstaging due to erroneous interpretation of the CT appearance of a double IVC has been reported in testicular tumor [6, 7].
A radical nephrectomy with lymph node sampling is the “gold standard” surgical protocol for unilateral WT [9,10,11]. However, retroperitoneal surgery such as nephrectomy might injure the anomalous venous structures that are in fact typically thin walled, dilated and tortuous [12]. Thus, it is vital to recognize the abnormal vasculature such as IVC duplication and avoid a life-threatening hemorrhage in retroperitoneal surgery or intervention [4, 13,14,15,16].
In addition to an en bloc resection of the tumor, lymph node sampling is another significant goal in WT surgery [17]. However, patients with anomalous venous anatomy might have unusual patterns of lymph node metastases, for the reason that the lymphatic drainage generally follows the vascular architecture [18]. Thus, lymph node sampling or dissection in a patient with a venous anomaly might be adjusted accordingly [7].
WT involves IVC invasion in 4–8% of cases [19], and caval extension of WT has been an important surgical challenge. Although tumor thrombus of renal vein or IVC was not found in the present case, extension of renal cell carcinoma into duplications of IVC and the retroaortic renal veins has been reported [18, 20,21,22].
CT is the most reliable technique for detecting tumor and retroperitoneal venous anomalies. Three-dimensional CT angiography can be used for detecting the duplication of IVC before surgery or other interventional procedures of the retroperitoneum are undertaken [23]. In WT, preoperative CT is also an important diagnostic tool and adjunct in assessing lymph node involvement to provide accurate treatment recommendations [24].
In our case, a plain chest X-ray was performed for the evaluation of pulmonary metastases and the report was normal. Considering the disadvantage of radiation exposure, a routine pulmonary CT that was still controversial [25] was not performed.
