Skip to main content

Comparison between 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic diagnosis and narrow-band imaging for bladder cancer detection

A Correction to this article was published on 17 February 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

To compare 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)-mediated photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) with narrow-band imaging (NBI) for cancer detection during transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT).

Methods

Between June 2018 and October 2020, 114 patients and 282 lesions were included in the analysis. Patients were orally administered 5-ALA (20 mg/kg) 2 h before TURBT. The bladder was inspected with white light (WL), PDD, and NBI for each patient, and all areas positive by at least one method were resected or biopsied. The imaging data were then compared to the pathology results.

Results

The sensitivities of WL, PDD, and NBI for detecting urothelial carcinoma were 88.1%, 89.6%, and 76.2%, respectively. The specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detecting urothelial carcinoma were 47.5%, 80.9%, and 61.3%, respectively, for WL; 22.5%, 74.5%, and 46.2%, respectively, for PDD; and 46.3%, 78.2%, and 43.5%, respectively, for NBI. PDD was significantly more sensitive than NBI for all lesions (p < 0.001) and carcinoma in situ (CIS) lesions (94.6% vs. 54.1%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

PDD can increase the detection rate of bladder cancer, compared to NBI, by greater than 10%. Therefore, 100% of CIS lesions can be detected by adding PDD to WL.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Bladder cancer is the ninth most frequently diagnosed malignancy in the world [1] and is the fourth leading cause of death among men [2]. The 5-year recurrence rate of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer ranges from 50 to 70%, and the reported 5-year progression rate ranges from 10 to 30% [3]. Transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) with intraoperative detection of the cancer by white light (WL) is the standard treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer [4]. However, it is difficult to detect flat lesions, including carcinoma in situ (CIS), with WL alone, and the high rate of intravesical recurrence of CIS is problematic. Therefore, it is important to accurately detect CIS in order to be able to eliminate any residual tumour, and more importantly to identify the patients who require further treatment such as intravesical BCG. It is known that the addition of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) and narrow-band imaging (NBI) to WL increases the detection rate of cancer in flat lesions that do not appear as distinct lesions with conventional WL [5,6,7,8]. They also are associated with lower recurrence rates compared to WL only [2, 9,10,11]. PDD is a technique that exploits the property of tumours or rapidly proliferating cells to emit red fluorescence during cystoscopy using blue light, after oral or intravesical administration of a photosensitizing precursor such as 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA). NBI is a technique that utilises the fact that tissue penetration by light depends on its wavelength. By exposing the bladder wall to light with two narrow-banded wavelengths, that are easily absorbed by haemoglobin, capillaries on the surface of the mucosa are displayed as brown and blood vessels inside the submucosa as blue-green, highlighting the tumour. PDD using 5-ALA (5-ALA-PDD) for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer reduces the risk of recurrence [12], and has a real-world sensitivity and specificity of 90.1% and 61.2%, respectively [13]. For NBI, a meta-analysis showed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer were 94.8% and 65.6%, respectively [14].

The 2021 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines strongly recommend taking biopsies from both abnormal-looking urothelium and normal-looking mucosa (mapping biopsies from the trigone, bladder dome, right, left, anterior, and posterior bladder wall) when cytology is positive, in case of a history of high grade (G3) tumours, and for tumours with non-papillary appearance. Moreover, PDD-guided biopsies should be used if equipment is available. However, bladder biopsy using NBI during TURB is weakly recommended [15].

Some studies have examined the usefulness of combining PDD and NBI for the detection of flat lesions [16, 17]. However, no comparative studies exist between 5-ALA-PDD and NBI for the detection of urothelial carcinoma, including both protruded and flat lesions. The purpose of this study was to compare 5-ALA-PDD and NBI in terms of bladder cancer detection capability in the same patients.

Material and methods

Study cohort and design

This single-centre retrospective cohort study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB No. zn210416) and conformed to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013). All patients were informed of the efficacy and adverse events associated with 5-ALA-PDD and NBI, and we obtained informed consent from all patients before the operation. A total of 141 patients with primary bladder cancer, who underwent 5-ALA-PDD and NBI-assisted TURBT between June 2018 and October 2020, were included in the study. Eighteen patients with random bladder biopsies, five patients with histology consistent with prostate cancer, squamous cell carcinoma, or renal cell carcinoma, and four patients with no observation records for either NBI or 5-ALA-PDD were excluded. Included in the analysis were 114 patients with 282 lesions. Figure 1 shows the flow diagram of the study. We recorded the data on the surgeons' interpretation of the images prospectively, and analysed them retrospectively.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of patient enrolment

Surgical procedure

All patients were administered 20 mg/kg of 5-ALA 2 h before the start of surgery. In all cases, the positive and negative lesions were determined by two urologists. At the time of TURBT, the bladder was inspected with WL, 5-ALA-PDD, and NBI, and all lesions deemed positive by at least one modality were resected. WL was used first and was followed by either 5-ALA-PDD or NBI depending on the surgeon’s preference. We used AUTOCON® III 400 (KARL STORZ, Tuttlingen) for PDD and OES ELITE 30° optic tube Φ4 mm (Olympus, Tokyo) for NBI. Bladder inspection with each modality occurred consecutively. Figure 2 shows a typical view by each modality. After TURBT, 50 mg of epirubicin hydrochloride in 50 mL of saline solution was instilled into the bladder through a Foley catheter, which was clamped for 30 min. The patients were kept out of direct sunlight for 48 h after surgery. We reviewed the pathology results and the intraoperative detection frequencies of each modality, and, accordingly, determined the cancer detection rate and sensitivity for each modality. Grading was performed according to the 2016 World Health Organization classification.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Representative endoscopy images of positive tumour findings in protruded and flat lesions using a WL, b PDD, c NBI

Safety assessment

We noted the incidence of side effects common with 5-ALA, such as vomiting, liver damage, and hypotension. Grades were determined based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 6.

Statistical analysis

The extracted data from the prospective database included age, sex, body mass index, preoperative urine cytology, operation time, surgeon, anaesthetic method, pathological examination, length of hospital stay, readmission, in-hospital complications, and Clavien-Dindo grade [18]. We calculated and compared the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for each lesion. Significant differences between the two groups were assessed based on McNemar's odds ratio using standard analysis software (BellCurve for Excel; Social Survey Research Information Co., Ltd.). All statistical tests were two-tailed, with p < 0.05 indicating statistical significance.

Results

In total, 282 lesions from 114 patients were included in the study, and all of them were available for data analysis. A total of 24 patients were observed with PDD first followed by NBI, and 90 patients were observed with NBI first followed by PDD. Table 1 shows the patients’ characteristics. The specimens’ histology is presented in Table 2. Urothelial carcinoma (UC) was diagnosed in 202 specimens, whereas the remaining 80 were benign. Of the benign specimens, 3 were consistent with dysplasia, 13 with papilloma, and the rest were normal tissues. Table 3 shows the sensitivity of each modality for the detection of UC and the specificity for benign lesions. As shown, 5-ALA-PDD had a higher overall sensitivity than NBI (89.6% vs. 76.2%, p < 0.001). It also was more sensitive than NBI for CIS lesions (94.6% vs. 54.1%, p < 0.001). We were able to detect 100% of the CIS lesions with combined WL + PDD (WP), thus increasing the rate of detection by 35.1% compared with that of WL alone.

Table 1 Patients’ background and tumour characteristics
Table 2 Specimen histology
Table 3 Sensitivity of each modality for detection of UC and specificity for benign lesions

Adverse events, including hypotension (N = 61), elevated liver enzyme levels (N = 4), and vomiting (N = 20) were less than grade 3. All incidents (N = 61) of hypotension were of grade 2 or lower according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Of the 67 patients who received lumbar anaesthesia, 22 patients (32.8%) received intraoperative vasopressors, and of the 47 patients who received general anaesthesia, 39 patients (83.0%) received vasopressors during induction. None of the patients required vasopressors after the surgery. Elevated levels of aspartate aminotransferase were found in four patients, one of whom was classified as grade 2, and three were classified as grade 1. All the patients who had vomiting were classified as grade 1. They had vomiting postoperatively within a median of 5.9 (interquartile range: 1.3–7.4) hours following 5-ALA administration. In all cases, nausea had disappeared by the next day. Regarding postoperative complications, there were 12 cases of grade 1 or higher as per the Clavien-Dindo classification. There was only one case of grade 3a, which required ERCP for fever due to postoperative recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. The remaining 11 cases were grade 2 or lower, including temporary postoperative urinary retention and clot retention requiring manual bladder washing to eliminate the blood clot.

Discussion

In this study, 5-ALA-PDD was superior and considered more useful than NBI in reducing the number of missed tumours. The detection rate of pTis lesions in the WL + PDD group was 100%, and the rate of additionally detected CIS with WL + PDD was increased by 35.1% compared with WL alone. Although this 100% sensitivity is partially due to the fact that we did not sample negative lesions for PDD, NBI, or WL; thus, it is possible that some patients may have had an undetected CIS that we were not aware of; 5-ALA-PDD proved to be particularly useful in detecting flat lesions such as CIS. The present study determined a lower specificity for PDD than other reports [12, 13]. This may be due to the lack of a systematic biopsy of the negative areas and the exclusion of cases for whom random biopsies were performed, such as cold-cup biopsies of normal appearing lesions, or biopsies on lesions that were even slightly positive for PDD to avoid missing cancer. This is one of the limiting factors that prevented us from examining the specificity in the present study as it was a retrospective study.

According to the literature, transient elevation of liver enzymes of grade 3 or lower, as well as hypotension, can occur due to 5-ALA, and caution is recommended with its use [19, 20]. In this study, there was only one case of grade 3a adverse effects, which was not associated with 5-ALA. Moreover, the rest of the adverse events were grade 2 or lower, and could be easily managed.

The present study has several limitations which are as follows: (1) the small number of patients included; (2) single-centre retrospective design; (3) inter-observer and intra-observer bias, which was due to the subjective nature of visual estimation and could be potentially be addressed by the development of methods to quantify visual information; and (4) procedure bias introduced by the order of use of each modality and the time between 5-ALA administration and bladder inspection in PDD. This study includes the possibility that the sensitivity of PDD was increased because of the bias in which many of the patients were observed first with NBI followed by PDD. There is a phenomenon called photobleaching, in which 5-ALA degrades upon repeated illumination and the detection rate is reduced [21]. Although observation at 2–4 h after 5-ALA oral administration is recommended, the time of 5-ALA exposure to light may be less important, as it has been shown that no significant difference exists between exposure times of 2–3 h and 4 h or more [13]. Recent studies have shown a fluorescence enhancement effect using polyethylene glycol-modified titanium dioxide nanoparticles [21], which may be useful for reducing the bias caused by photobleaching.

Conclusions

5-ALA-PDD at the time of TURBT increased the detection rate of bladder cancer and especially of flat lesions such as CIS, compared to NBI. Furthermore, the combination of PDD with WL, which is the current standard of care, achieves 100% sensitivity in the detection of CIS. Prospective studies will be needed to verify these results.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Change history

Abbreviations

5-ALA:

5-Aminolevulinic acid

CIS:

Carcinoma in situ

NBI:

Narrow-band imaging

PDD:

Photodynamic diagnosis

TURBT:

Transurethral resection of bladder tumour

WL:

White light

References

  1. Antoni S, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Znaor A, Jemal A, Bray F. Bladder cancer incidence and mortality: a global overview and recent trends. Eur Urol. 2017;71:96–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lenis AT, Lec PM, Chamie K. Bladder cancer: a review. JAMA. 2020;324:1980–91. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.17598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kamat AM, Hahn NM, Efstathiou JA, Lerner SP, Malmström P, Choi W, et al. Bladder cancer. Lancet. 2016;388:2796–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30512-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Babjuk M, Böhle A, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Compérat EM, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2016. Eur Urol. 2017;71:447–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kriegmair M, Baumgartner R, Knüchel R, Stepp H, Hofstädter F, Hofstetter A. Detection of early bladder cancer by 5-aminolevulinic acid induced porphyrin fluorescence. J Urol. 1996;155:105–9 (discussion 9–10).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Filbeck T, Roessler W, Knuechel R, Straub M, Kiel HJ, Wieland WF. Clinical results of the transurethreal resection and evaluation of superficial bladder carcinomas by means of fluorescence diagnosis after intravesical instillation of 5-aminolevulinic acid. J Endourol. 1999;13:117–21. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1999.13.117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Dominicis C, Liberti M, Perugia G, De Nunzio C, Sciobica F, Zuccalà A, et al. Role of 5-aminolevulinic acid in the diagnosis and treatment of superficial bladder cancer: improvement in diagnostic sensitivity. Urology. 2001;57:1059–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(01)00948-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zaak D, Kriegmair M, Stepp H, Stepp H, Baumgartner R, Oberneder R, et al. Endoscopic detection of transitional cell carcinoma with 5-aminolevulinic acid: results of 1012 fluorescence endoscopies. Urology. 2001;57:690–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(00)01053-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Naselli A, Introini C, Timossi L, Spina B, Fontana V, Pezzi R, et al. A randomized prospective trial to assess the impact of transurethral resection in narrow band imaging modality on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer recurrence. Eur Urol. 2012;61:908–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kutwin P, Konecki T, Cichocki M, Falkowski P, Jabłonowski Z. Photodynamic diagnosis and narrow-band imaging in the management of bladder cancer: a review. Photomed Laser Surg. 2017;35:459–64. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2016.4217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grossman HB, Stenzl A, Fradet Y, Mynderse LA, Kriegmair M, Witjes JA, et al. Long-term decrease in bladder cancer recurrence with hexaminolevulinate enabled fluorescence cystoscopy. J Urol. 2012;188:58–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakai Y, Inoue K, Tsuzuki T, Shimamoto T, Shuin T, Nagao K, et al. Oral 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic diagnosis using fluorescence cystoscopy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter phase III study. Int J Urol. 2018;25:723–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13718.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamamoto S, Fukuhara H, Karashima T, Inoue K. Real-world experience with 5-aminolevulinic acid for the photodynamic diagnosis of bladder cancer: diagnostic accuracy and safety. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther. 2020;32: 101999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Xiong Y, Li J, Ma S, Ge J, Zhou L, Li D, et al. A meta-analysis of narrow band imaging for the diagnosis and therapeutic outcome of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. PLoS ONE. 2017;12: e0170819. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170819.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Comperat EM, Dominguez Escrig JL, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (Ta, T1, and Carcinoma in Situ). Eur Urol. 2022;81:75–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Naya Y, Oishi M, Yamada Y, Ueda T, Fujihara A, Nakanishi H, et al. Initial experience of combined use of photodynamic diagnosis and narrow band imaging for detection of flat urothelial lesion. Int J Clin Oncol. 2015;20:593–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-014-0748-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Drejer D, Béji S, Oezeke R, Nielsen AM, Høyer S, Bjerklund Johansen TE, et al. Comparison of white light, photodynamic diagnosis, and narrow-band imaging in detection of carcinoma in situ or flat dysplasia at transurethral resection of the bladder: the DaBlaCa-8 study. Urology. 2017;102:138–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.11.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yatabe T, Marie SL, Fukuhara H, Karashima T, Inoue K, Yokoyama M. 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced severe hypotension during transurethral resection of a bladder tumor: a case report. JA Clin Rep. 2019;5:58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-019-0279-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Nohara T, Kato Y, Nakano T, Nakagawa T, Iwamoto H, Yaegashi H, et al. Intraoperative hypotension caused by oral administration of 5-aminolevulinic acid for photodynamic diagnosis in patients with bladder cancer. Int J Urol. 2019;26:1064–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14099.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kanehira K, Yano Y, Hasumi H, Fukuhara H, Inoue K, Hanazaki K, et al. Fluorescence enhancement effect of TiO2 nanoparticles and application for photodynamic diagnosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:3698. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20153698.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding or grants were provided for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors participated in creating the study design. HH performed recruitment, clinical follow up, interpretation of data, statistical analyses and writing of the manuscript. NM contributed to the original concept and design of this study. YM, HK, SM, YA, MK, NT, TY and MK provided a critical revision of the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroki Hagimoto.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital’s Research Ethics Committee (IRB No. zn210416) and all participants provided written consent. This study was conformed to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original article was revised: figure 1 and reference number in second paragraph under the “Discussion” section has been updated.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hagimoto, H., Makita, N., Mine, Y. et al. Comparison between 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic diagnosis and narrow-band imaging for bladder cancer detection. BMC Urol 21, 180 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-021-00946-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-021-00946-w

Keywords