Skip to main content

The identification of pregnant women with renal colic who may need surgical intervention

Abstract

Background

Renal colic is a surgical emergency in pregnancy that is caused by a range of non-obstetric factors and known to occur more frequently during the second and third trimesters. Several studies have reported that up to 70–80% of stones pass spontaneously during pregnancy. There are some patients will not pass their stones and will ultimately require surgical intervention. Through retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 212 pregnant women with renal colic, the predictive factors of pregnant women with renal colic in need of surgical intervention were determined.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of 212 pregnant women presenting with renal colic between 1st January 2009 and 31st December 2020. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified a range of predictive variables for surgical intervention. In addition, we used receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to evaluate the predictive power of our model and created a nomogram for clinical application.

Results

Of the 212 patients presenting with acute renal colic in pregnancy, 100 patients (47.2%) underwent surgical intervention and 112 patients (52.8%) were treated conservatively. Univariate analysis identified significant differences between the two groups with regards to fever, the duration of pain, white blood cells, C-reactive protein, ureteral stone size, hydronephrosis, and stone location. Multivariate analysis further identified a number of independent predictors for surgical intervention, including fever, a duration of pain ≥ 4 days, a ureteral stone size ≥ 8 mm, and moderate or severe hydronephrosis.

Conclusions

We identified several independent predictors for surgical intervention for renal colic in pregnancy. Fever, a duration of pain ≥ 4 days, a ureteral stone size ≥ 8 mm, and moderate/severe hydronephrosis, play significant roles in predicting surgical intervention. Our nomogram can help to calculate the probability of surgical intervention in a simple and efficient manner. Prospective studies are now required to validate our model.

Peer Review reports

Background

Renal colic is a surgical emergency in pregnancy that is caused by a range of non-obstetric factors and known to occur more frequently during the second and third trimesters. Approximately 1:200 to 1:1500 pregnant women experience a symptomatic stone event that might be caused by renal colic or complications related to renal colic [1, 2]. There is no significant difference between pregnant and non-pregnant women with regards to the probability of developing renal colic [3]; however, this condition is potentially troublesome and can lead to hospitalization, invasive treatment, and serious adverse effects for both the mother and fetus.

Several studies have reported that up to 70–80% of stones pass spontaneously during pregnancy. This is partly because the urinary tract is normally dilated in pregnant women, although a previous study reported that 50% of such patients expel their stones during the post-partum period [4]. However, the rate of spontaneous stone passage ranges from 48 to 84% in the existing literature and should not really differ from the rate of spontaneous stone passage in non-pregnant women when stratified by stone size [5,6,7]. There are some patients will not pass their stones and will ultimately require surgical intervention. These patients may suffer from unrelenting colic pain, premature rupture of membranes [8]. and preterm delivery [9], renal impairment, and even septicemia.

Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a method that could identify patients who are more likely to require surgical intervention. This would enable clinicians to optimize their management plans and minimize the impact of renal colic on both the mother and fetus, thereby reducing readmission, hospitalization time, and costs. Previous studies have identified a number of factors that show promise for predicting the probability and duration of spontaneous passage, including the location and size of the calculus, pain, the degree of hydronephrosis, perinephric stranding, white cell counts [10,11,12]. Very few studies have specifically considered the prediction of surgical intervention for renal colic during pregnancy. The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors that could pregnant women who are likely to require surgical intervention during the acute presentation of renal colic.

Methods

Study subjects

This was a retrospective review involving pregnant patients with renal colic at The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between 2009 and 2020. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (The version number was V 1.0) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The study population included pregnant women who were treated for renal colic in hospital. The diagnosis of renal colic and underlying urolithiasis was based on the clinical manifestations of pain, location, the time of onset, and ultrasound findings. We excluded cases involving abdominal pain that was caused by other factors. When the process of clinical management was unclear on the medical records, or if clinical data were absent, we contacted the patients involved by telephone and retrieved the missing information. We excluded patients if the method of intervention was unclear. The cohort was divided into patients who underwent surgical intervention (ureteral stent placement, nephrostomy or ureteroscopic lithotripsy; Group 1) and those who were managed effectively by conservative methods, as demonstrated by the lack of symptoms during pregnancy on follow-up and normal levels of creatinine in the blood (Group 2).

Data collection and variables

We recorded a range of data for each patient, including patient demographics (fever, including body mass index [BMI], the duration of pain, indicators of infection (white blood cells [WBCs], C-reactive protein [CRP]), stone-related parameters (size and location) and hydronephrosis. Fever referred to Body temperature over 37.5 °C. The duration of pain referred to time from the beginning of pain to attendance at the emergency room. Stone size was based on the largest meridian of the stone after ultrasound measurement.

Stone location was divided into three categories: kidney, ureter, and none. Data relating to hydronephrosis was acquired by ultrasonography of the urinary system. Hydronephrosis was classified as mild(< 30 mm), moderate(≥ 30 mm, < 40 mm), and severe ≥ 40 mm).

The first-line management of patients who developed renal colic was conservative, including hydration, painkillers, and antibiotics. Surgical intervention was required if conservative therapy failed or the patient suffered any of the following conditions: unrelieved persistent renal colic, febrile urinary tract infections, sepsis, or obstructive uropathy. Urinary drainage was achieved via the placement of a ureteral stent or by percutaneous nephrostomy (PNL).

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are presented as medians with inter-quartile range (IQR) and were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-squared test. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was carried out with MedCalc® statistical software(version 15.2.2). Logistic regression was used to perform multivariable analysis when predicting the need for surgical intervention. The nomogram was created using R software(version 3.6.3). A two-tailed p value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 for Windows.

Results

A total of 242 consecutive pregnant patients who attended our Emergency Department met the inclusion criteria for renal colic. After excluding patients with unknown interventional status (n = 9), missing data (n = 13), back pain or abdominal pain that was not caused by renal colic (n = 10), we recruited a final cohort of 212 patients. Of these, 100 patients (47.2%%) underwent surgical intervention while 112 patients (52.8%) were treated effectively by conservative management.

The demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging variables for the entire cohort, and separated by group, are given in Table 1. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with regards to age (29 years vs 29 years, p = 0.71), gestation (22 weeks vs 24 weeks, p = 0.48), or BMI (21.9 kg/cm2 vs 22.55 kg/cm2, p = 1.00).

Table 1 Univariate analysis of demographic, clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound variables

Data arising from the univariate analysis of clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters, is provided in Table 1. There were significant differences between the two groups with respect to the duration of pain, fever, WBC count, CRP level, ureter stone size, hydronephrosis, and stone location.

Table 2 shows the association between seven different variables and surgical intervention, as determined by univariate analyses. The use of these clinical variables in logistic regression analysis further yielded a model of 4 variables that showed good overall accuracy for identifying cases that require surgical intervention. The odds ratios (ORs) for each variable, adjusted for the other variables in the model, are shown with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The area under the ROC curve was 0.859 (95% CI 0.81–0.90; p < 0.001) (Fig. 1).

Table 2 Multivariate analysis of significant variables identified by univariate analysis
Fig. 1
figure 1

ROC curve analysis of risk factors (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.859, p < 0.01)

Next, we incorporated significant variables from the logistic regression analysis into R software in order to create a nomogram (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Nomogram for predicting surgical intervention in pregnant women suffering from renal colic. Points: score for each variable; Fever: Body temperature over 37.5 °C; hydronephrosis (mm): was classified as none/mild and moderate/severe; Ureterstones: Ureteral stones size larger or smaller than 8 mm by ultrasound; Pain Duration (d): time from the beginning of pain to attendance at the emergency room; total points: the total score of adding each variable score; Predicted probability: the likelihood of requiring surgical intervention

The nomogram can be used to calculate a given patient’s risk score, thus identifying whether the patient is likely to require surgical intervention. For example, a pregnant woman with renal colic has no fever, and the time from pain to admission is 4 h. The B-ultrasound indicates that the ureteral stone size is 10 mm and the hydronephrosis is 44 mm. The corresponding score of this patient is 0 + 100 + 90 + 0 = 190, the predicted probability of requiring surgical intervention is 90%. If any one of these variables is present, then the sensitivity and specificity of the model is 74% and 83.93%, respectively.

Discussion

We analyzed data from patients with renal colic during pregnancy who were treated in our department over the past 10 years. The main feature of this study is that we specifically evaluated patients with renal colic during pregnancy with a potential need for surgical intervention. We demonstrated that the duration of pain, ureteral stone size, hydronephrosis, and fever were independent predictors for surgical intervention.

The consideration of patient factors is an important element when making treatment decisions for renal colic [13]. In accordance with previous reports [14,15,16], our present analysis demonstrated that the duration of pain symptoms is a significant clinical predictor for surgical intervention. We found that patients with < 4 days of pain were more likely to be treated effectively by conservative techniques, while those with ≥ 4 days of pain were more likely to undergo surgical intervention. In fact, it has been suggested that delayed presentation, when considered as a single factor, may reduce the likelihood of stones passing spontaneously [17]. We consider that the duration of pain is an important predictor for surgical intervention as this is a relatively easy parameter to acquire in an era were significant emphasis is placed on imaging and laboratory findings. In addition, the intensity of pain is closely related to surgical intervention [18]. Unfortunately, we were unable to acquire comprehensive evaluation records that related to the intensity of pain.

The occurrence of hydronephrosis in a normal pregnancy has been attributed to hormonal effects, external compression, and intrinsic changes in the ureteral wall [19]. Pathological hydronephrosis can usually be distinguished from physiological hydronephrosis by the presence of flank pain or the radiographic or sonographic visualization of the cause of the obstruction. In the present study, the degree of hydronephrosis differed between the two groups and therefore influenced the decision as to whether to perform surgery. Furthermore, we found that patients with moderate to severe hydronephrosis are more likely to undergo surgical intervention in pregnancy.

Ureteral stone size is a well-recognized prognostic factor for the successful passage of stones and is a key factor to consider when decision making [10, 19]. The passage rates for stones < 3 mm, 3–4.9 mm, 5–6.9 mm, and ≥ 7 mm have been reported to be 50%, 13%, 10%, and 0%, respectively [20]. In the present study, we found that a stone size stones ≥ 8 mm is a risk factor for surgical intervention. Compared with non-pregnant women, ureteral stones are easier to pass during pregnancy due to the fact that the ureters are dilated.

Approximately 50% of pregnant women with stones will suffer from urinary tract infection and will require antibiotics. Urgent decompression of the urinary system in a febrile or septic pregnant woman, followed by a subsequent definitive solution under improved conditions, is highly recommended for such cases [21]. In the present study, 16% of pregnant women had fever and 70% patients who had a persistently high fever underwent surgery. However, antibiotic treatment was effective for pregnant women who had not undergone surgery and had transient fever. Through ROC curve, fever can predict that 56.6% of patients will require surgery. Therefore, a persistent high fever in pregnant women with acute renal colic may result in sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome, thus endangering the safety of the mother and child; surgical intervention is vital in such cases.

Our analyses ultimately allowed us to create a nomogram. Based on this nomogram, it is possible to calculate a risk score for a given patient. Thus, we can determine the probability of surgical intervention. We believe that the use of this nomogram in clinical practice may help us to guide the management of patients suffering from renal colic in pregnancy.

There are several limitations to our study that should be considered. Owing to the retrospective nature of the data acquisition, the decision to intervene surgically lacks appropriate standardization. Moreover, the decision to treat patients non-surgically was not standardized and we cannot therefore assess all of the potential factors that were involved in the decision-making process. Another limitation is that this analysis reflects our own treatment decisions that may not be in concordance with other urological centers. We are based in the South China Urology Stone Treatment Center. Many of our patients had undergone a series of interventions in an outer hospital before coming to our institution. This may have increased our rate of surgical intervention. However, none of our patients were found to have elevated levels of serum creatinine. Furthermore, except for one case, involving premature delivery after the placement of a ureteral stent, all patients were discharged from the hospital safely. Although one patient with premature birth occurred after surgery, the patient also had other important factors leading to premature birth, such as fever, pyelonephritis, which could led to adverse results. At our institution, ultrasound is the imaging study of choice. This is because ultrasound can safety evaluate stone size, stone location, and hydronephrosis in pregnancy. Although computed tomography (CT) has become the preferred imaging method for diagnosing urinary stones, we only use B-ultrasound in pregnant cases. Data from CT imaging techniques are likely to improve the estimation of calculus size and location, particularly when very small calculi are present.

Conclusion

Using local data, we identified several independent predictors for surgical intervention during an episode of renal colic in pregnancy; we used this information to create a nomogram. Our analyses identified that a duration of pain ≥ 4 days, a stone size ≥ 8 mm, fever, and hydronephrosis, all play significant roles in the prediction of surgical intervention. Our nomogram may have clinical utility when making decisions regarding treatment options. An electronic version of this nomogram will be available in the future.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ED:

Emergency Department

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

BMI:

Body mass index

WBCs:

White blood cells

CRP:

C-reactive protein

References

  1. Semins MJ, Matlaga BR. Management of stone disease in pregnancy. Curr Opin Urol. 2010;20:174–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Butler EL, Cox SM, Eberts EG, et al. Symptomatic nephrolithiasis complicating pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:753–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Curhan GC, Willett WC, Knight EL, et al. Dietary factors and the risk of incident kidney stones in younger women: Nurses’ Health Study II. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:885–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stothers L, Lee LM. Renal colic in pregnancy. J Urol. 1992;148:1383–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Parulkar BG, Hopkins TB, Wollin MR, et al. Renal colic during pregnancy: a case for conservative treatment. J Urol. 1998;159:365–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Travassos M, Amselem I, Filho NS, et al. Ureteroscopy in pregnant women for ureteral stone. J Endourol. 2009;23:405–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burgess KL, Gettman MT, Rangel LJ, et al. Diagnosis of urolithiasis and rate of spontaneous passage during pregnancy. J Urol. 2011;186:2280–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis DF, Robichaux AG, Jaekle RK, et al. Urolithiasis in pregnancy. Diagnosis, management and pregnancy outcome. J Reprod Med. 2003;48:28–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Swartz MA, Lydon-Rochelle MT, Simon D, et al. Admission for nephrolithiasis in pregnancy and risk of adverse birth outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1099–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coll DM, Varanelli MJ, Smith RC. Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:101–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Parekattil SJ, White MD, Moran ME, et al. A computer model to predict the outcome and duration of ureteral or renal calculous passage. J Urol. 2004;171:1436–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sfoungaristos S, Kavouras A, Perimenis P. Predictors for spontaneous stone passage in patients with renal colic secondary to ureteral calculi. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012;44:71–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ordon M, Andonian S, Blew B, et al. CUA guideline: management of ureteral calculi. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9:E837-851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dal Moro F, Abate A, Lanckriet GR, et al. A novel approach for accurate prediction of spontaneous passage of ureteral stones: support vector machines. Kidney Int. 2006;69:157–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bajaj M, Yuan L, Holmes LC, et al. Predictors of surgical intervention following initial surveillance for acute ureteric colic. World J Urol. 2018;36:1477–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Modai J, Avda Y, Shpunt I, et al. Prediction of surgical intervention for distal ureteral stones. J Endourol. 2019;33:750–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sfoungaristos S, Kavouras A, Kanatas P, et al. Early hospital admission and treatment onset may positively affect spontaneous passage of ureteral stones in patients with renal colic. Urology. 2014;84:16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Portis JL, Neises SM, Portis AJ. Pain is independent of stone burden and predicts surgical intervention in patients with ureteral stones. J Urol. 2018;200:597–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Beydoun SN. Morphologic changes in the renal tract in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1985;28:249–56.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hubner WA, Irby P, Stoller ML. Natural history and current concepts for the treatment of small ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 1993;24:172–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuebker JM, Robles J, Kramer JJ, et al. Predictors of spontaneous ureteral stone passage in the presence of an indwelling ureteral stent. Urolithiasis. 2019;47:395–400.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the support of the fund project and the data provided by the medical record room.

Funding

This research was supported by the funds of “Study on Bile Acids on ICP Placental Vessel Formation and Regulation Mechanism” (20130A) and “Study on early diagnosis of latent hepatitis B virus transmitted from mother to child” (2017ZC0223). The funds provides support for article editing and publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Manuscript writing/editing, MMH; Data Analysis, XTL; Data collection, XLX; Protocol/project development, ML; Study Concept and Design, ZHH. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhihui He.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. The version number was V 1.0. All patients signed an informed consent form before the operation.

Consent to publish

All participants provided consent for the publication of individual pseudonymised quotations.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, M., Lin, X., Lei, M. et al. The identification of pregnant women with renal colic who may need surgical intervention. BMC Urol 22, 30 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-00985-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-00985-x

Keywords

  • Renal colic
  • Pregnancy
  • urolithiasis
  • Intervention