Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prostate-specific antigen nadir within 1 year of radiotherapy combined with hormone therapy predicts cancer-specific mortality and biochemical recurrence-free survival in prostate cancer patients

BMC Urology volume 22, Article number: 182 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In this study, we investigated the ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 12 months after (nPSA12) external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), overall survival (OS), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 338 intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT with ADT at our institution between 2000 and 2018. The median radiation dose was 76 Gy, the median initial PSA level was 17 ng/mL (range, 1–228 ng/mL), and the median duration of ADT was 24 months (range, 6–167 months). The median PSA level 1 months after EBRT was 0.06 ng/mL (range, 0–25.6 ng/mL). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Patient survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.

Results

The median follow-up time was 5 years (range, 1–20 years). Multivariate analysis revealed that nPSA was an independent and significant factor associated with OS, PCSM, and BRFS (P = 0.008, P = 0.001, P = 0.04). Furthermore, the time to nPSA12 was an independent predictor of PCSM and BRFS (P = 0.042, P = 0.021). Pelvic irradiation was also significantly associated with worse OS and PCSM (P = 0.004, P = 0.01). Additionally, age (≤ 70 or > 70 years) and hormone therapy duration (6 months, 1–3 years, or > 3 years) were significantly associated with OS and PCSM, respectively (P = 0.004, P = 0.02). For high risk, nPSA and nPSA12 were an independent predictor for BRFS. (P = 0.021, P = 0.029)

Conclusion

The nPSA12 level of > 0.06 ng/mL may independently predict worse PCSM and BRFS in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing EBRT and ADT. Additionally, for high risk, nPSA > 0.06 ng/mL and nPSA12 > 0.06 ng/mL may independently predict worse BRFS.

Peer Review reports

Background

According to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines, patients with localized prostate cancer can be classified based on their clinical outcomes as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk [1, 2]. Intermediate- and high-risk patients with localized prostate cancer are often treated with definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Numerous large-cohort phase III trials have demonstrated that the combination of ADT and EBRT can significantly improve prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), distant metastasis (DM), and biochemical recurrence (BR) rates [3,4,5,6,7].

The measurement of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels is an invaluable biochemical method for prostate cancer screening, treatment response monitoring, and disease recurrence detection. The nadir in prostate-specific antigen (nPSA) after radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to predict BR, DM, cause-specific mortality (CSM), and overall mortality (OM) [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Additionally, mounting evidence suggests that time-limited measures of PSA are independent early predictors of BR and DM in patients undergoing definitive EBRT [14,15,16]. However, the prognostic value of nPSA in prostate cancer patients treated with concurrent ADT and EBRT remains unclear.

The aim of this study was to determine whether a 12-month post-treatment nPSA (nPSA12) cutoff value of 0.06 ng/mL can serve as an early predictor of biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), PCSM, and overall survival (OS) in prostate cancer patients treated with concurrent ADT and EBRT.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 338 intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent radiotherapy combined with ADT between 2000 and 2018 at our institution. All patients had biopsy-confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate and underwent serum PSA testing before treatment. The T stage was determined based on a digital rectal examination. Based on NCCN guidelines, patient risk was classified as intermediate or high. Patient characteristics, including the clinical stage, are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Patient characteristics, treatment, and univariate analysis results
Full size table

All patients were treated with either high-dose 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) or volumetric-modulated arc therapy, delivering 70–78 Gy in 28–39 fractions. For intermediate-risk patients, the clinical target volume (CTV) included in the prostate and the seminal vesicles, and 54 Gy was delivered in the first phase of treatment. In the second phase, the dose delivered to the prostate was increased to 70–76 Gy. For high-risk patients, the CTV included the prostate, seminal vesicles, and pelvic lymph nodes; 54 Gy delivered in the first phase of treatment. In the second phase, the dose was increased to 74–78 Gy. The risk of lymph node involvement was calculated according to the Roach formula, and patients with a high risk (> 15%) of lymph node metastasis received pelvic radiation. The dose was typically prescribed at the 95% isodose of the beam arrangement and was normalized so that the planning treatment volume was included within the 95% isodose line. All patients were treated with 6 MV photons and received neoadjuvant or concurrent ADT. All patients were also treated with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (Goserelin 10.8 mg/3 months, leuprolide acetate 11.25 mg/3 months or 22.5 mg/3months) plus nonsteroidal antiandrogens (bicalutamide 50 mg once daily, orally administered for 1 month). Typically, intermediate-risk patients underwent ADT for 6 months, whereas high-risk patients received ADT for 1–3 years. Neoadjuvant ADT was preferred in patients with large prostate tumors.

The treatment response was monitored by serum PSA testing every 3 months during ADT. Patients had the PSA value of at least 4 after treatment. Patients were followed-up every 3 months for the first 2 years, every 6 months for the following 3 years, and annually thereafter. We defined nPSA as the lowest PSA achieved after treatment. Time to nPSA was defined as the time from treatment initiation to nPSA achievement. BR was defined as a PSA level of at least 2 ng/mL above the nPSA, as per the Phoenix BR definition. Tumor metastases were detected radiographically, and the cause of death was recorded. We collected at least 4 post-treatment PSA values for each patient. nPSA12 was defined as a PSA level of 0.06 ng/mL achieved in the first year of radiotherapy completion. All patients were followed-up for at least 1 year.

BRFS, PCSM, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and OS were determined from the date of RT completion, and patients were stratified based on nPSA12 levels (≤ 0.06 ng/mL or > 0.06 ng/mL). Survival time was defined as the time between the last radiotherapy session and the last follow-up or death. OS was defined as the time between disease diagnosis and the follow-up or death. Patient survival was analyzed using the Kaplan‑Meier method and the log‑rank test. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the prognostic value of nPSA12 levels. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

The median follow-up time after RT completion was 5 years (range, 1–20 years). Univariate analyses revealed that advanced age (> 70 years) (SE = 11.4, 95%CI = 139.5-184.4; P = 0.003), concurrent hormone therapy (SE = 11.4, 95%CI = 139.5-184.4, P = 0.04), pelvic irradiation (SE = 11.4, 95%CI = 139.5-184.4, P = 0.006), and nPSA > 0.06 ng/mL (SE = 9.8, 95%CI = 146.7-185.2, P = 0.002) were significantly associated with poor OS. Positive biopsy (≥ 0.5%) (SE = 5.9, 95%CI = 199.8-223.3, P = 0.01), tumor size (≥ 50%) (SE = 5.9, 95%CI = 201.6-224.7, P = 0.006), Gleason score (> 7) (SE = 5.8, 95%CI = 200.6-223.4, P = 0.03), high risk (SE = 5.8, 95%CI = 200.6-223.4, P = 0.045), prolonged hormone therapy (> 3 years) (SE = 5.8, 95%CI = 200.6-223.4, P = 0.001), pelvic irradiation (SE = 13, 95%CI = 79.2-130.7, P < 0.0001), nPSA > 0.06 ng/mL (SE = 20.7, 95%CI = 135.3-216.6, P < 0.0001), and prolonged time to nPSA (≥ 12 months) (SE = 5.9, 95%CI = 199.5-222.9, P = 0.017) were significantly associated with poor CSS (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Univariate analysis assessing the ability of nPSA levels (≤ 0.06 ng/mL or > 0.06 ng/mL) to predict OS, PCSM, and BRFS.

Full size image

Comorbidities (SE = 14.8, 95%CI = 177.8-236.1, P = 0.023), Gleason score (> 7) (SE = 15.9, 95%CI = 175.7-238.2, P = 0.004), histological grade (grades 4 and 5) (SE = 15.9, 95%CI = 175.7-238.2, P < 0.0001), high risk (SE = 15.9, 95%CI = 175.7-238.2, P = 0.005), initial PSA levels (> 20 ng/mL) (SE = 15.9, 95%CI = 175.7-238.2, P = 0.034), RT dose (> 76 Gy) (SE = 15.9, 95%CI = 175.7-238.2, P = 0.001), pelvic irradiation (SE = 15.9, 95%CI = 175.7-238.2, P < 0.0001), IMRT technique (SE = 15.9, 95%CI = 175.7-238.2, P < 0.0001), nPSA > 0.06 ng/mL (SE = 15.9, 95%CI = 175.6-238.3, P < 0.0001), and prolonged time to nPSA (≥ 12 months) (SE = 15.9, 95%CI = 175.6-238.3, P = 0.003) were significantly worse associated with BRFS (Table 1; Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Univariate analysis assessing the ability of nPSA12 to predict PCSM and CSS.

Full size image

Multivariate analyses revealed that nPSA ≤ 0.06 ng/mL was independently and significantly better associated with OS (P = 0.008), PCSM (P = 0.001), and BRFS (P = 0.04). Similarly, time to nPSA < 12 month was independently and significantly better associated with PCSM (P = 0.042) and BRFS (P = 0.021). RT small (prostate) field prostate was significantly better associated with OS (P = 0.004) and PCSM (P = 0.01). Furthermore, age ≤ 70 was independently associated with OS (P = 0.004) and hormone therapy period (6 months) was independently better associated with PCSM (P = 0.02; Table 2).

Table 2 Multivariate analysis results showing the prognostic value of different clinicopathological parameters
Full size table

In univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, intermediate and high risk PC were analyzed separately. For intermediate risk, statistically significant difference was found in nPSA for OS, PCSM, BRFS (P = 0.027, P < 0.0001, P = 0.041). In addition, statistically significant difference was found for PCSM in % positive biopsies, % tumor volume and nPSA12 (P = 0.028, P = 0.003, P = 0.021). For high risk, statistically significant difference was found in nPSA for OS, PCSM, BRFS (P = 0.034, P < 0.0001, P = 0.005). In addition, statistically significant difference was found for OS in age (P = 0.02) and for BRFS in RT dose (P = 0.037), nPSA12 (P = 0.03). nPSA (≤ 0.06 ng/mL )(P = 0.021) and nPSA12 (time to nPSA < 12 month) (P = 0.029) were found to be independent and significantly better predictive factors for BRFS in multivariate analysis.

The 10- and 15-year cumulative incidences of PCSM were 88.8% and 74%, respectively. The 10- and 15-year cumulative incidences of BRFS were 84.3% and 69.4%, respectively. For nPSA12 ≤ 0.06 ng/mL, the 10- and 15-yearcumulative incidences of PCSM and BRFS were 96.5%, 87.2% and 99.3%, 72.5% respectively. Grades 1 and 2 rectal toxicity were observed in 80 (23%) and 18 (5%) patients. Moreover, grades 1 and 2 late urinary toxicity were observed in 180 (53%) and 20 (6%) patients. No cases of severe toxicity (grades 3 and 4) were observed. Erectile function was affected in 113 (33%) patients.

Discussion

In this study, we found that nPSA levels of > 0.06 ng/mL within 12 months after ADT and EBRT predicted worse clinical outcomes in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients. Importantly, nPSA12 > 0.06 ng/mL was significantly associated with poor PCSM, and BRFS. Similarly, pelvic irradiation, > 70 years of age, and prolonged (> 3 years) hormone therapy were associated with poor OS and PCSM.

The relationship between BRFS and different nPSA levels has been previously investigated [2, 8, 17]. These previous studies have shown that the combination of antiandrogens with RT decreased PSA levels and that ADT led to lower nPSA values [18, 19]. Patel et al. [20] reported a strong association between an early post-RT PSA level of ≥ 0.09 ng/mL and high risks of BF, DM, PCSM, and death from all causes. Geara et al. [21] found that an nPSA level of 0.06 ng/mL was an independent predictor of BFS in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer undergoing definitive EBRT and ADT. Consistently, we found that nPSA levels > 0.06 ng/mL were associated with worse OS, PCSM, and BRFS.

Cavanaugh et al. [22] demonstrated a strong association between PSA levels and BR, CSM, and OM. Alcantara et al. [15] identified nPSA12 (≤ 2 versus > 2 ng/mL) as an early predictor of BF, DM, and mortality, independent of RT dose and outcome determinants after RT. 10-year DM rates for nPSA12 ≤ 2 versus > 2 ng/mL were 4% versus 19% (P < 0.0001). Ray et al. [14] a total of 4839 patients were treated for Stage T1-T2 prostate cancer with RT and without hormone therapy. 8-year rate of PSA-DFS, DMFS, and OS in patients with a trough PSA12 (≤ 2.0 ng/mL or > 2 ng/mL) 55%, 95% and 73% respectively or 40%, 88% and 69% respectively. In the study of Ogawa et al. [23] 84 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with RT and hormone therapy. 3-year PFS rate in patients with nPSA12 levels < 0.5 ng/mL and patients with nPSA12 levels ≥ 0.5 ng/mL were 96% and 44%, respectively (p < 0.0001). In this study, for nPSA12 (≤ 0.06 ng/mL or > 0.06 ng/mL), the 8 year incidences of PCSM and BRFS were 91.1%, 92% respectively or 83.2%, 65.9% respectively. We found that nPSA12 was an independent predictor for PCMS, BRFS in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients after ADT and EBRT.

The clinical usefulness of pelvic irradiation in patients with a high risk of lymph node metastasis remains controversial. In this study, we found that pelvic irradiation worsened patient survival. Patients with high risk and receiving pelvic RT may have poorer survival as they have a more locally advanced stage. For this reason, PCSM at intermediate risk prostate cancer patients was 94.6%-81.1% at 10–15 years, while it was 83.8%-70.8% at high risk prostate cancer patients (p = 0.04). In addition, Prostate cancer is more common among the elderly, especially in older men with comorbidities. Here, we found that comorbidities were the cause of approximately 70% of all deaths.

Numerous randomized studies have shown that the combination of prolonged hormone therapy (1–3 years) with RT may benefit high risk prostate cancer patients. In this study, we found that hormone therapy for more than 3 years led to worse PCSM. This can be explained by the fact that these patients are very high risk patients.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our findings suggest that nPSA12 levels of > 0.06 ng/mL within 12 months after ADT and EBRT may be a useful prognostic factor of worse survival outcomes in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

3DCRT:

3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy

ADT:

Androgen deprivation therapy

BR:

Biochemical recurrence

BRFS:

Biochemical recurrence-free survival

CI:

Confidence intervals

CTV:

Clinical target volume

CSM:

Cause-specific mortality

CSS:

Cancer-specific survival

DM:

Distant metastasis

EBRT:

External beam radiotherapy

IMRT:

Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy

HR:

Hazard ratios

nPSA12:

12 months after PSA

NCCN:

National Comprehensive Cancer Network

OM:

Overall mortality

OS:

Overall survival

PCSM:

Prostate cancer-specific mortality

PSA:

Prostate-specific antigen

RT:

Radiotherapy

SE:

Standard error

References

  1. D’Amico AV, Moul J, Carroll PR, Sun L, Lubeck D, Chen MH. Cancer-specific mortality after surgery or radiation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer managed during the prostate-specific antigen era. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2163–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zelefsky MJ, Lyass O, Fuks Z, Wolfe T, Burman C, Ling CC, et al. Predictors of improved outcome for patients with localized prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant androgen ablation therapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:3380–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roach M 3rd, Bae K, Speight J. et al. Short-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy and external-beam radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: long-term results of RTOG 8610. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:585–91.

  4. D’Amico AV, Manola J, Loffredo M. Renshaw AA, DellaCroce A, Kantoff PW. Six-month androgen suppression plus radiation therapy vs radiation therapy alone for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;292:821–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolla M, Van Tienhoven G, Warde P, Dubois JB, Mirimanoff RO, Storme G, et al. External irradiation with or without long-term androgen suppression for prostate cancer with high metastatic risk: 10-year results of an EORTC randomized study. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:1066–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zapatero A, Guerrero A, Maldonado X, Alvarez A, Gonzalez San Segundo C, Cabeza Rodríguez MA, et al. High-dose radiotherapy with short-term or long-term androgen deprivation in localised prostate cancer (DART01/05 GICOR): A randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:320–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pilepich MV, Winter K, Lawton CA, Krisch RE, Wolkov HB, Movsas B, et al. Androgen suppression adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy in prostate carcinoma long-term results of phase III RTOG 85 – 31. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 61;1285-90.

  8. Zietman AL, Tibbs MK, Dallow KC. et al. Use of PSA nadir to predict subsequent biochemical outcome after external beam radiation therapy for T1-2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Radiother Oncol. 1996;40:159–62.

  9. Pollack A, Zagars GK, Antolak JA, Kuban DA, Rosen II. Prostate biopsy status and PSA nadir level as early surrogates for treatment failure: analysis of a prostate cancer randomized radiation dose escalation trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;54:677–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Critz FA, Williams WH, Holladay CT. et al. Post-treatment PSA < or = 0.2 ng/mL defines disease freedom after radiotherapy for prostate cancer using modern techniques. Urology. 1999;54:968–71.

  11. Ray ME, Thames HD, Levy LB. et al. PSA nadir predicts biochemical and distant failures after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a multi-institutional analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:1140–50.

  12. Hanlon AL, Diratzouian H, Hanks GE. Posttreatment prostate-specific antigen nadir highly predictive of distant failure and death from prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53:297–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pollack A, Hanlon AL, Movsas B, Hanks GE, Uzzo R, Horwitz EM. Biochemical failure as a determinant of distant metastasis and death in prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:19–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ray ME, Levy LB, Horwitz EM, Kupelian PA, Martinez AA, Michalski JM, et al. Nadir prostate- specific antigen within 12 months after radiotherapy predicts biochemical and distant failure. Urology. 2006;68:1257–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alcantara P, Hanlon A, Buyyounouski MK, Horwitz EM, Pollack A. Prostate- specific antigen nadir within 12 months of prostate cancer radiotherapy predicts metastasis and death. Cancer. 2007;109(1):41–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22341.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zelefsky MJ, Yamada WSY, Kollmeier MA, Cox B, Park J. Postradiotherapy 2- year prostate- specific antigen nadir as a predictor of long- term prostate cancer mortality. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75:1350–6.

  17. Lee WR, Hanlon A, Hanks GE. Prostate specific antigen nadir following external beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the relationship between nadir level and disease-free survival. J Urol. 1996;156:450–3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199608000-00033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tseng YD, Chen M, Beard C, Martin N, Orio PF, Loffredo M, et al. Posttreatment prostate specific antigen nadir predicts prostate cancer specific and all-cause mortality. J Urol. 2012;187(6):2068–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. D’amico AV, Chen M, Castro MD, Loffredo M, Lamb DS, Steigler A, et al. Surrogate endpoints for prostate cancer-specific mortality after radiotherapy and androgen suppression therapy in men with localised or locally advanced prostate cancer: an analysis of two randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(2):189–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Patel MA, Kollmeier M, McBride S, Gorovets D, Varghese M, Chan L, et al. Early biochemical predictors of survival in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer treated with radiation and androgen deprivation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2019;140:34–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2019.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Geara FB, Bulbul M, Khauli RB, Andraos TY, Abboud M, Al Mousa A, et al. Nadir PSA is a strong predictor of treatment outcome in intermediate and high risk localized prostate cancer patients treated by definitive external beam radiotherapy and androgen deprivation. Radiat Oncol. 2017;12(1):149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0884-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cavanaugh SX, Fuller CD, Kupelian PA. et al. Time and PSA threshold model prognosticates long-term overall and disease-specific survival in prostate cancer patients as early as 3 months after external beam radiation therapy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2005;8:353–8.

  23. Ogawa K, Nakamura K, Sasaki T, Onishi H, Koizumi M, Shioyama Y, et al. Japanese Patterns of Care Study Working Subgroup of Prostate Cancer. External beam radiotherapy for clinically localized hormone-refractory prostate cancer: clinical significance of Nadir prostate-specific antigen value within 12 months. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jul 1;74(3):759 – 65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.067.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not for profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Marmara University, Fevzi Cakmak Mah., Muhsin Yazıcıoglu Cd. No:10, 34899, Pendik, İstanbul, Turkey

    Ilknur Alsan Cetin & Sıtkı Utku Akay

  2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Acıbadem University, İstanbul, Turkey

    Meric Sengoz

Authors
  1. Ilknur Alsan Cetin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sıtkı Utku Akay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Meric Sengoz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

IAC wrote the manuscript. SUA completed data collection. MS reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilknur Alsan Cetin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This retrospective study was conducted in compliance with the principles of the Helsinki declaration and informed consent was obtained from each patient. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Marmara University (Approval number: 09.2019.384).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The English in this document has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English. For a certificate, please see: http://www.textcheck.com/certificate/zAyMYR.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cetin, I.A., Akay, S.U. & Sengoz, M. Prostate-specific antigen nadir within 1 year of radiotherapy combined with hormone therapy predicts cancer-specific mortality and biochemical recurrence-free survival in prostate cancer patients. BMC Urol 22, 182 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01125-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01125-1

Keywords

BMC Urology

ISSN: 1471-2490

Contact us