Skip to main content

Retrospective analysis of urethral anastomosis with ancillary maneuvers and intraoperative biaxial defect measurements to achieve a tension free guidance system for redo PFUDD treatment

Abstract

Objectives

Redo surgery for pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects (PFUDDs) is still a challenge. the long urethral defect makes it difficult while the high tension increase the recurrence rate. Although certain ancillary maneuvers can relieve tension, there is no consensus or guidelines for the prediction/planning of the selection. In this study, we present our experience with developing an intraoperative guidance system to achieve tension-free urethral anastomosis.

Patients and methods

A total of 91 recurrent PFUDD patients managed at our center between 2020 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients underwent scar removing and urethral anastomosis. For the long defect and high-tension cases, 6 kinds of tension-relieving maneuvers were used respectively during the process of urethral anastomosis. Preoperative assessment of the urethrogram was done before surgery, while biaxial (vertical and horizontal) defect measurements were performed intraoperatively. The patients were followed-up for 12 months (8.9 ± 4.2), furthermore, recurrence and complications were analyzed.

Results

The overall success rate was 86.81%. The mean defect in urethrogram was 2.9 ± 1.1 cm. 27 simple anastomosis was performed when the vertical plus horizontal defect was less than 2 cm with 11.11% recurrence. 24 cavernous septum splittings were performed when the horizontal defect was greater than 2 cm with 8.33% recurrence. 21 inferior pubectomies were performed when the horizontal defect was greater than 3 cm with 19.05% recurrence. 15 ancillary distal urethra manipulations (fully distal urethral mobilization, urethral suspension and corpus cavernosa folding) were performed when the vertical defect was 3 to 4 cm with 13.33 recurrence. 4 reroutings were performed when the vertical defect was greater than 4 cm with 25.00% recurrence.

Conclusions

Ancillary maneuvers are effective for reducing tension in redo urethral anastomosis. Measurement of divergent vertical and horizontal urethral defects could guide the selection of ancillary maneuvers. Combined tension-relieving maneuvers is recommended according to the defect direction and length to achieve a tension-free anastomosis.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

A pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect (PFUDD) is one of the most common types of traumatic urethral stricture. The main treatment for PFUDD is anastomosis, which has not changed significantly in recent years compared to anterior urethroplasty [1,2,3]. The primary tension free end to end anastomosis have a high success rate because of relative normal anatomy, blood supply [4]. Redo PFUDD surgery is complicated by several anatomical features of the posterior urethral tissue, including a lack of corpus spongiosum to support the dissociative substitutes, the length of the path of the blood supply to the pedicle flap, compact scar tissue, and a deep location of the healthy proximal urethra [1,2,3, 5]. Although a bulbar membranous urethral anastomosis is commonly performed, defect > 4 cm are more complicated, especially in patients with multiple surgical failures, floating bladder, urethral fistula, or pediatric urethral strictures [1, 2]. The other problem is the discrepancy in defect length between that in the urethrogram and intraoperative measurement which causes the under estimation of the difficulty and complex during surgery.

Transperineal urethral anastomosis is the preferred surgical treatment for recurrent PFUDD; this procedure involves removing the atretic segment, exposing and trimming the distal and proximal urethral ends, and creating a tension-free urethral anastomosis [2, 3]. In general, the natural elasticity of the bulbar urethra allows the resection of a 1–2-cm-long segment to bridge a defect of similar length [6]. However, for patients with complicated long-segment stenosis, a large defect makes it difficult to achieve tension-free anastomosis due to stretching the distal and proximal ends, which leads to recurrence [7]. Treatment of a long posterior urethral stricture is challenging and requires the use of tension-relieving techniques. Opinions on the choice of technique are controversial [8]. Current guidelines and expert consensus statements published by the European and American urology societies recommend the use of evidence-based techniques for the treatment of posterior urethral strictures, but they do not provide detailed recommendations regarding the surgical procedures [9,10,11,12]. In addition to general treatment principles, guidelines should provide adequate details about the operation to perform urethral anastomosis. Previous studies have described several techniques to relieve the tension in anastomoses [13,14,15,16,17], but there is no consensus on the preferred technique. A conventional urethrogram does not predict the need for an inferior wedge pubectomy [8].

In previous studies, investigators have mostly described single methods for tension reduction. The aim of this study was to review patients with recurrent PFUDD underwent surgery in our center (the largest urethral center in China) in the past 2 years, to analyze various ancillary maneuvers and the circumstances for application. The research will provide a guidance system based on divergent biaxial measurement for tension free urethral anastomosis.

Materials and methods

Grouping criteria

We retrospectively screened the records of 328 patients who underwent end-to-end urethral anastomosis at our hospital between January 2020 and December 2022 and selected 91 recurrent patients for inclusion in this study (Fig. 1). We selected patients with a 2–4-cm-long membranous urethral defect on urethrography that developed after a pelvic fracture who underwent suprapubic cystostomy at least 1 month before the operation. We excluded patients with a bladder neck injury (n = 17), urethral fistula (n = 27), accompanying anterior urethral stricture (n = 56), penile transposition urethral anastomosis (n = 8), graft replacement urethral anastomosis (n = 48), or incomplete follow-up (n = 81). The preoperative evaluation included age, time of injury, number and method of previous operations, physical examination, routine urine examination, urine culture, urinary flow rate, urethrogram, and urethroscopy. The patients underwent surgery 3 months after the pelvic fracture and had a lack of bacterial growth in urine cultures. Preoperatively, the suprapubic tube was replaced, and a urine culture was performed daily. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered according to drug sensitivity test results. The bladder was irrigated twice a day with 1,000 mL of 0.9% saline mixed with 5 mL of povidone-iodine. Surgery was performed after a negative urine culture result was returned. The patient was admitted to the hospital on the day of surgery.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Retrospective chart review for inclusion and exclusion of cases

Surgical techniques

The patients were administered general anesthesia and placed in the lithotomy position. An inverted Y-shaped incision was made in the perineum, and the bulbous urethra was separated to free the distal and proximal ends. Then, the distal end was freed to the level below the scrotum and transected at the disrupted site of the membranous urethra. The scar tissue was removed to expose the mucosa on both ends of the anastomoses. Then, the vertical and horizontal urethral defect lengths were measured. The extension line of the distal urethra is the Y line, the extension line of the proximal urethra is the X line. The reference point is the end of distal urethra and the proximal urethra. The vertical distance is from the distal reference point to the X line. The horizontal distance is from the proximal reference point to the Y line. For patients with long defect and high tension, 6 ancillary maneuvers were performed successively (Video 1).

Cavernous septum splitting (Fig. 2A): An electric scalpel was used to incise the septum of the penile cavernous body along the middle of the junction. The depth of the septal cut reached the lower edge of the pubis. The distal urethra was embedded into the penile cavernous septum after anastomosis.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Ancillary maneuvers. A: penile cavernous septum incision; B: resection of the lower margin of the symphysis pubis; C: distal urethra mobilization; D: transposition of the anterior urethra at the foot of the cavernosum; E: folding of the penile cavernous body; F: urethral spongiform suspension

Inferior pubectomy (Fig. 2B): An electric scalpel was used to incise the periosteum to the lower edge of the pubic symphysis. Then, a wedge-shaped section of the bone was removed with a bottom width and height of 1.5–2.0 cm to create a direct urethral anastomosis with an osteotome.

Urethral mobilization to the penile-scrotal junction (Fig. 2C): Urethral tension was assessed by pulling the distal urethra to meet the proximal urethra. In the case of significant tension in the distal urethra, the urethra was freed to the penile-scrotal junction.

Rerouting of the anterior urethra (Fig. 2D): A channel was created to allow the anterior urethra to cross the tissue surrounding the bifurcation of the corpus cavernosum. Then, the anterior urethra was translocated to the lower edge of the corpus cavernosum to create a tension-free anastomosis with the posterior urethra.

Corpus cavernosa folding (Fig. 2E): This technique affects erectile function and should be avoided in patients who prefer to retain sexual function.

Urethral cavernous tissue suspension (Fig. 2F): Urethral tension after anastomosis was reduced by applying sutures to connect the two sides of the urethral cavernous tissue and the albuginea of the corpus cavernosum. The suture was placed on the corpus cavernosum 0.5 cm below that on the urethral cavernous tissue.

An F16 urinary catheter remained in place for 4 weeks after the operation, and the cystostomy tube was removed 3 weeks after normal urination resumed. Urine flow rate and urethroscopy were performed postoperatively.

Follow-up

The postoperative data included recurrence of the stricture and time of recurrence. In the case of urinary incontinence, the method used to treat the incontinence was recorded. Letters, emails, medical software, and the social media application WeChat were used to record postoperative urine flow rates and complete self-report questionnaires, PROM (USS-PROM). Surgical failure was evaluated using the annual Qmax, which required a uroflow voided volume of at least 200 mL. For patients with a Qmax less than 15 mL/s, follow-up cystoscopy was performed. Failure of passage of an F16 flexible cystoscope was used to indicate stricture recurrence. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) was used to evaluate sexual function before and after surgery, with scores less than 21 indicating erectile dysfunction (ED).

Statistical analysis

SPSS software (version 22.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. The baseline characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics and are presented as numbers and percentages. The chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare data. P values < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Table 1 presents the baseline information of the patients. The average age of the patients was 43.7 ± 13.2 years. In total, 6 (6.59%), 74 (81.31%), and 11 (12.09%) patients were aged < 18, 18–60, and > 60 years, respectively. The mean stricture length on the urethrogram was 2.9 ± 1.1 cm. The intraoperative mean horizontal and vertical defect lengths were 3.2 ± 1.3 cm and 3.5 ± 0.7 cm, respectively, indicating that urethrography seemed to be inefficient in the assessment of stricture length. Postoperatively, the average follow-up duration was 8.9 ± 4.2 months, and recurrence occurred at 3–6, 7–9, 10–12 and > 12 months in 27 (29.67%), 27 (29.67%), 26 (28.57%), and 11 (12.09%) patients, respectively.

Table 1 Descriptive analysis of the basic information (N = 91)

Table 2 describes the choice of surgical approach and reduction strategy at different vertical and horizontal lengths of the urethral defect measured urographically and intraoperatively. Twenty-seven patients (29.67%) underwent direct anastomosis alone with a mean horizontal defect of 1.4 ± 0.5 cm, of whom 3 (11.11%) experienced recurrence at follow-up. Three patients (3.30%) underwent direct anastomosis + distal urethral-assisted reduction (distal urethral freeing, urethral suspension, penile corpus cavernosum folding) with a mean horizontal defect of 1.7 ± 0.6 cm and no cases of recurrence. Two patients (2.20%) underwent a simple cavernous septal split with a mean horizontal defect of 2.6 ± 0.6 cm. Nineteen patients (20.88%) underwent a cavernous septal split + distal urethral-assisted reduction with a mean horizontal defect of 2.7 ± 0.5 cm, with 1 recurrence (5.26%). Twenty-one patients (23.08%) underwent inferior pubectomy alone with a mean horizontal defect of 3.7 ± 0.8 cm, with 4 recurrences (19.05%) at follow-up. Fifteen patients (16.48%) underwent inferior pubectomy + distal urethral-assisted reduction with a mean horizontal defect of 3.7 ± 0.7 cm, with a total of 2 patients (13.33%) experiencing recurrence. Four patients (4.40%) underwent inferior pubectomy + distal urethral-assisted reduction + urethral rerouting with a mean defect of 3.9 ± 0.6 cm, with a total of 1 patient (25.00%) experiencing recurrence.

Table 2 The anastomosis and manipulation in regard to the divergent defect length

The data from the univariate analysis (Table 3) showed that although the difference between the age of the patients and the recurrence rate was not significant, this may have been influenced by the sample size and the survival period of the patients. The tabulated data indicate that, different from the conventional perception, the percentage of recurrence of urethral strictures was relatively high in patients < 18 years old, with a recurrence rate of 16.67%; a total of 10 patients between 18 and 60 years of age experienced recurrence, a rate of 13.51%, and only 9.01% of patients older than 60 years of age experienced recurrence. The statistical results showed that the presence or absence of a history of repair surgery prior to anastomosis was a relevant factor in the recurrence of urethral stricture and that patients with a history of surgery were more likely to have stricture recurrence than those without a history. One recurrence occurred in patients with a total length of stay < 8 days (11.11%), 8 recurrences (13.56%) in patients who stayed 8–14 days, and 3 recurrences (13.04%) in patients who stayed > 14 days; statistical analysis showed that length of stay was not a relevant factor for stricture recurrence.

Table 3 Univariate analysis of stricture recurrence and basic information

As shown in Table 4, mild SUI occurred in 1 patient (1.10%) after surgery. The overall recurrence rate of urethral restenosis was 13.17% (12 cases). The time to recurrence was distributed between < 6 months (5; 41.67%), 6–12 months (4; 33.33%), and > 12 months (3; 25.00%). Seventy-three patients had preoperative and postoperative ED data. Preoperatively, 46 patients (63.01%) reported ED, while 27 patients (36.99%) were able to achieve erection, of whom 19 patients (70.37%) had normal erections and 8 patients (29.63%) achieved only partial erections and were unable to have intercourse. After urethroplasty, 10 (37.03%) of the 27 patients with normal preoperative erections reported ED. Five (29.41%) of the 17 (62.96%) patients with normal postoperative erections reported mild erectile dysfunction.

Table 4 Recurrence and complications of urethral strictures after surgery

We summarized a guidance system to decide when to perform a simple anastomosis or any of six additional tension-relieving maneuvers (Fig. 3). When the distance from the proximal urethra to the corpus cavernosum extension (horizontal defect length) was longer than 2 cm, the cavernous septum was dissected before the anastomosis was created; when it was longer than 3 cm, a pubectomy was performed. When the distance from the horizontal extension of the distal urethra to the distal end (vertical defect length) was shorter than 3 cm in the resting state without traction, a simple anastomosis was performed. When the vertical defect length was longer than 3 cm, distal urethral manipulations (distal urethral mobilization to the penile-scrotal junction, urethral suspending, and cavernosa folding) were performed. When the vertical defect length was 4 cm, urethral rerouting was performed.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Schematics of the tension-relieving techniques according to the divergent defect length

Discussion

In this study, we described 91 recurrent PFUDD patients who underwent redo urethral anastomosis at our center over the past 2 years. The urethrogram is the most popular method for urethral evaluation, which could provide the condition/length of anterior urethra, gap condition, degree of malalignment and bone related factors. Recently, we noticed that there was a significant difference between the urethrogram and intraoperative measurement of the urethral defect length. Therefore, urethrograms are not adequate for the determination of urethral stricture complexity and the need for ancillary manipulations. We performed different surgical procedures to reduce the tension in anastomoses and measured divergent urethral defect lengths on vertical and horizontal directions. In the results, we introduced a guidance system to apply ancillary maneuvers.

Releasing the entire distal urethra as far as the suspensory ligament of the penis is necessary to create a tension-free anastomosis and results in an increase of almost 3 cm in urethral length [18]. Chordee formation can be prevented by avoiding excessive dissection beyond the suspensory ligament of the penis. Koraitim reported that 73% of patients were treated with urethral mobilization alone, and simple surgery was adequate for patients with a defect shorter than one-third of the bulbar urethral length on the urethrogram [14]. In Western populations, the urethra is longer and can be stretched to achieve a simple tension-free anastomosis [8]. However, Flynn [16] reported that among 120 patients treated with perineal posterior urethroplasty, only 8% required urethral mobilization alone. In our study, 27 patients (29.67%) underwent a simple anastomosis and had a low recurrence rate (11.11%).

Corpus cavernosum septum splitting is frequently performed to relieve tension in urethral anastomoses, although the depth of the incision varies. In Flynn’s study [16], 34% of patients required corporal splitting, compared to 23.08% of patients in our study. For most pelvic fractures and urethral strictures, corpus cavernosum septum splitting is adequate to fully expose the proximal anastomosis. However, it also reduces the urethral length required and changes the acute angle of the anastomosis to an obtuse angle, which reduces the tension of the anastomosis.

For patients with a long defect due to the bladder ascending in the horizontal direction, an inferior pubectomy is needed. The need for inferior pubectomy cannot be predicted. Andrich et al. [19] reported no association between the measured defect length and type of subsequent surgery in 62% of patients. PFUDD severity and the need for inferior pubectomy are much higher in Asian countries (67% in India) than in Western countries (18% in Italy and 10% in the US) [15, 16, 20, 21]. Due to the complexity of the cases referred to our hospital, the proportion of patients who required an inferior pubectomy was high. Kulkarni et al. [22] reported that inferior pubectomy was inadequate in many second urethral anastomoses, which led to surgical failure.

Supracrural rerouting is a controversial maneuver performed by Webster in 11 cases; the need for this maneuver cannot be predicted preoperatively [13, 18]. In a previous study, 66 complex cases (4.12%) underwent supracrural rerouting, most of whom were underage [17]. This method was rarely used in other studies; supracrural rerouting was performed in only 2.8% of patients in Kizer’s report [15] and not at all in Morey’s report [13]. Saini et al. [23] suggested that rerouting adds 2 cm of urethral length for the anastomosis. In this study, paracavernous bypass was used in 4 patients, most of whom were preadolescent patients.

The true incidence of ED after PFUDD surgery is difficult to estimate. First, preinjury erectile function is usually not well documented with objective findings. Almost all data on pre-PFUDD erectile function are described by patients after the onset of trauma by subjective recall and are therefore greatly influenced by recall bias. For this reason, there is also substantial variation in the literature regarding the reporting of ED rates after PFUDD. ED rates are not only variable but also subjective and often based on patient expectations of treatment outcomes. The true incidence of ED after PFUDD could be better elucidated if these data were more effectively and objectively collected to obtain robust evidence.

The cause of recurrence remains elusive as of now. We hypothesize that factors such as anastomotic tension, compromised blood supply resulting from excessive mobilization of the distal urethra or bulbar artery injury, residual scarring at the urethral ends, as well as postoperative inflammation or infection could be potential contributors. Ultrasound is frequently employed to evaluate the length and scarring of the urethra, which we believe could serve as a valuable tool in predicting recurrences. However, we have not utilized penile Doppler to assess the adequacy of blood supply. In the future, it could be a method to predict the failure and recurrence.

There are still some limitations in this study. Firstly, this is a retrospective study with recall bias and selection bias. The patients underwent prior failed surgery which influenced the base line. Secondly, there is no data about the prior failed procedures, because the patients come from different hospitals of China. In China, the patient’s data is still not opened to every hospital, so we can not get the data. All the patients have to get examinations including urethrogram in our hospital. At last, the sample size is small and more prospective, randomized studies are needed in the future.

Conclusion

The urethral defect length measured on a traditional urethrogram differed significantly from that measured intraoperatively. To achieve a tension-free anastomosis, multiple combined tension-relieving maneuvers were recommended according to the defect’s direction and length. Our results support the use of divergent vertical and horizontal urethral defect lengths for the prediction of difficulty in PFUDD treatment and the need for ancillary maneuvers in transperineal urethral anastomosis.

Video legend

The measurement method of divergent vertical and horizontal urethral defect lengths and six tension-relieving maneuvers.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Shanghai Eastern Institute of Urologic Reconstruction but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and are not publicly available. Data are available from the authors upon reasonable request, and with permission of Shanghai Eastern Institute of Urologic Reconstruction.

Data availability

All the data and materials are available.

References

  1. Goulao B, Carnell S, Shen J, MacLennan G, Norrie J, Cook J, et al. Surgical Treatment for recurrent Bulbar Urethral stricture: a Randomised Open-label superiority trial of Open Urethroplasty Versus Endoscopic Urethrotomy (the OPEN Trial). Eur Urol. 2020;78(4):572–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Osman NI, Chapple CR. Is urethrotomy as good as Urethroplasty in men with recurrent Bulbar Urethral strictures? Eur Urol. 2020;78(4):581–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Campos-Juanatey F, Osman NI, Greenwell T, Martins FE, Riechardt S, Waterloos M, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Urethral stricture disease (part 2): diagnosis, Perioperative Management, and follow-up in males. Eur Urol. 2021;80(2):201–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eredics K, Röthlin F, Wachabauer D, Sevcenco S, Marszalek M, Mock K, et al. The long-term outcome of urethrotomy for primary urethral strictures: a population-based analysis. BJU Int. 2021;128(4):477–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barratt R, Chan G, La Rocca R, Dimitropoulos K, Martins FE, Campos-Juanatey F, et al. Free graft augmentation urethroplasty for Bulbar Urethral strictures: which technique is best? A systematic review. Eur Urol. 2021;80(1):57–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mundy AR. Anastomotic urethroplasty. BJU Int. 2005;96(6):921–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuo TL, Venugopal S, Inman RD, Chapple CR. Surgical tips and tricks during urethroplasty for bulbar urethral strictures focusing on accurate localisation of the stricture: results from a tertiary centre. Eur Urol. 2015;67(4):764–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Joshi PM, Batra V, Kulkarni SB. Controversies in the management of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects. Turk J Urol. 2019;45(1):1–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rourke KF, Welk B, Kodama R, Bailly G, Davies T, Santesso N, et al. Canadian Urological Association guideline on male urethral stricture. Can Urol Assoc J. 2020;14(10):305–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen AJ, Agochukwu-Mmonu N, Makarov DV, Meeks W, Murphy J, Fang R, et al. Significant management variability of urethral stricture disease in United States: data from the AUA Quality (AQUA) Registry. Urology. 2020;146:265–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wessells H, Angermeier KW, Elliott S, Gonzalez CM, Kodama R, Peterson AC, et al. Male urethral stricture: American Urological Association Guideline. J Urol. 2017;197(1):182–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wessells H, Morey A, Souter L, Rahimi L, Vanni A. Urethral stricture Disease Guideline Amendment (2023). J Urol. 2023;210(1):64–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morey AF, McAninch JW. Reconstruction of posterior urethral disruption injuries: outcome analysis in 82 patients. J Urol. 1997;157(2):506–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Koraitim MM. On the art of anastomotic posterior urethroplasty: a 27-year experience. J Urol. 2005;173(1):135–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kizer WS, Armenakas NA, Brandes SB, Cavalcanti AG, Santucci RA, Morey AF. Simplified reconstruction of posterior urethral disruption defects: limited role of supracrural rerouting. J Urol. 2007;177(4):1378–81. discussion 81 – 2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Flynn BJ, Delvecchio FC, Webster GD. Perineal repair of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects: experience in 120 patients during the last 10 years. J Urol. 2003;170(5):1877–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu YM, Sa YL, Fu Q, Zhang J, Jin SB. Surgical treatment of 31 complex traumatic posterior urethral strictures associated with urethrorectal fistulas. Eur Urol. 2010;57(3):514–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Webster GD, Ramon J. Repair of pelvic fracture posterior urethral defects using an elaborated Perineal Approach: experience with 74 cases. J Urol. 1991;145(4):744–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Andrich DE, O’Malley KJ, Summerton DJ, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. The type of urethroplasty for a pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect cannot be predicted preoperatively. J Urol. 2003;170(2 Pt 1):464–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kulkarni SB, Surana S, Desai DJ, Orabi H, Iyer S, Kulkarni J, et al. Management of complex and redo cases of pelvic fracture urethral injuries. Asian J Urol. 2018;5(2):107–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kulkarni SB, Barbagli G, Kulkarni JS, Romano G, Lazzeri M. Posterior urethral stricture after pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects in developing and developed countries, and choice of surgical technique. J Urol. 2010;183(3):1049–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kulkarni SB, Orabi H, Kavanagh A, Joshi PM. RE re do urethroplasty after multiple failed surgeries of pelvic fracture urethral injury. World J Urol. 2019.

  23. Saini DK, Sinha RJ, Sokhal AK, Singh V. Analysis of anastomotic urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect: decadal experience from a high-volume tertiary care center. Urol Ann. 2019;11(1):77–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

National Natural Science Fund of China (grant no. 82170694, 81700590), Shanghai Jiao Tong University Biomedical Engineering Cross Research Foundation (grant no. YG2022ZD020, YG2017QN15).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study design and critical revision: QF.Data analysis and interpretation of data, manuscript drafting: ML.Data interpretation and manuscript drafting: KL Z.Data analysis: TT W.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kaile Zhang or Qiang Fu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was performed in accordance with the Ethical Standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All the patients got consent informed before surgery. The study was approved by Shanghai sixth people’s hospital’s research ethics committee.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, K., Liu, M., Wang, T. et al. Retrospective analysis of urethral anastomosis with ancillary maneuvers and intraoperative biaxial defect measurements to achieve a tension free guidance system for redo PFUDD treatment. BMC Urol 24, 82 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01456-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01456-1

Keywords