Skip to main content

Mendelian randomization study supports positive bidirectional causal relationships between genetically predicted insomnia symptom and liability to benign prostatic hyperplasia

Abstract

Background

Sleep quality may be related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), however causal associations have not been established. This study aimed to evaluate causal relationships between six sleep traits ([i] day time napping, [ii] daytime sleepiness, [iii] insomnia, [iv] long sleep duration, [v] short sleep duration, and [vi] sleep duration per hour) and BPH through a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) study.

Methods

Genome-wide association summary statistics of sleep traits and BPH were downloaded from public databases. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) was used as the main approach for causal inference. For causal estimates identified by IVW, various sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the reliability of the results: (i) four additional MR methods to complement IVW; (ii) Cochran’s Q test to assess heterogeneity; (iii) MR-Egger intercept test and MR-PRESSO global test to assess horizontal pleiotropy; and (iv) leave-one-out method to assess stability.

Results

Forward MR analyses indicated that genetically predicted insomnia symptom significantly increased BPH risk (OR = 1.267, 95% CI: 1.003–1.601, P = 0.048), while reverse MR analyses identified that genetically predicted liability to BPH significantly increased the incidence of insomnia (OR = 1.026, 95% CI: 1.000-1.052, P = 0.048). In a replicate MR analysis based on summary statistics including exclusively male participants, the finding of increased risk of BPH due to genetically predicted insomnia symptom was further validated (OR = 1.488, 95% CI: 1.096–2.022, P = 0.011). No further causal links were identified. In addition, sensitivity tests demonstrated the reliability of the MR results.

Conclusion

This study identified that a higher prevalence of genetically predicted insomnia symptoms may significantly increase the risk of BPH, while genetically predicted liability to BPH may in turn increase the incidence of insomnia symptom. Therefore, improving sleep quality and reducing the risk of insomnia could be a crucial approach for the prevention of BPH.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), often referred to as prostate enlargement, is a non-cancerous condition characterized by the enlargement of the prostate gland [1]. Primarily observed in older males, this condition is linked with a variety of urinary symptoms, including difficulty initiating urination, weak urine stream, and frequent urination, particularly at night [1]. With the exacerbation of global population aging, the prevalence of BPH has caused substantial economic burdens. Despite thorough investigations, the pathophysiology of BPH remains incompletely understood. One prevailing theory underscores the pivotal role of age-induced alterations and disturbances in hormonal equilibrium as the primary contributors to its development [2]. BPH treatment includes meds (alpha blockers, 5-ARIs, combo therapy), surgeries (TURP, HoLEP, Aquablation), and lifestyle changes (diet, exercise, bladder training) [3]. While these approaches alleviate symptoms, concerns about side effects and the need for continual management persist, underscoring the necessity for novel preventative strategies.

Generally, the risk factors for BPH encompass approximately five categories, namely chronological aging, hereditary factors, hormonal influences, modifiable lifestyle factors, and inflammatory processes [4]. While individuals with BPH commonly encounter nocturia, insomnia, and other sleep-related issues [5], recent studies have shown that sleep quality can also influence the incidence of BPH [6, 7]. Notably, the prevalence of sleep disorders tends to be higher among the elderly, affecting 50–60% of this demographic [8]. Sleep assumes a critical role in nurturing the central nervous system as well as rejuvenating physical abilities [9]. Moreover, inadequate sleep is associated with disturbances in immune function, metabolic processes, and hormonal functions [10]. Nonetheless, findings from observational studies could not elucidate the causality between sleep and BPH.

Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis represents a novel statistical approach that utilizes genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) to infer causal relationships between exposures and outcomes [11]. Due to the random assignment of genetic variations at the time of embryonic development, which is minimally influenced by postnatal environments, MR analysis holds the advantage of reducing confounders and lowering the likelihood of reverse causality [11]. The accessibility of summary statistics of genome-wide association study (GWAS) has significantly streamlined MR studies, guaranteeing robust statistical analyses owing to substantial sample sizes. In situations where conducting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is challenging or unethical, such as interventions related to sleep, MR studies serve as a valuable alternative. Here, a bidirectional MR study was performed to comprehensively assess the causal association between sleep traits and BPH, thereby providing evidence for the prevention of BPH from the perspective of improving sleep quality.

Methods

Study design

Figure 1 exhibits the general flow of this study. Specifically, GWAS summary statistics for the six sleep traits ([i] day time napping, [ii] daytime sleepiness, [iii] insomnia, [iv] long sleep, [v] short sleep, and [vi] sleep duration per hour) and BPH were first obtained from publicly available databases. Subsequently, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to each sleep trait were utilized as the IVs for the forward MR analysis, and SNPs related to BPH were utilized as the IVs for the reverse MR analysis. Then, the main approach, inverse variance weighted (IVW), was performed to assess causality. Furthermore, for the established causal associations, various sensitivity analyses were further implemented to evaluate the reliability of the results. Finally, we validated the main findings of this study by performing replicate MR analyses using GWAS summary statistics that included exclusively male participants.

Fig. 1
figure 1

General flowchart of this MR study

Obtaining GWAS summary statistics

Detailed information of all GWAS summary statistics is displayed in Supplementary Table S1. Summary statistics of the six sleep traits, including day time napping [12], daytime sleepiness [13], insomnia [14], long sleep [15], short sleep [15], and sleep duration per hour [15], were derived from GWAS studies conducted based on participants from the UK Biobank cohort. GWAS summary statistics for BPH were derived from the FinnGen R9 cohort, which consisted of 30,066 patients and 119,297 healthy controls [16]. Since sleep characteristics and BPH were from two separate cohorts, there was no overlap of participants, thus avoiding bias. Since this study was a secondary analysis based on public data, no extra ethical consent was required.

Selection of IVs

IVs were identified in accordance with three core assumptions: First, IVs were significantly related to exposures. Second, IVs were independent of confounders. Third, IVs were not directly related to outcomes. SNPs associated with sleep traits were utilized for forward MR analysis, while SNPs related to BPH were used for reverse MR analysis. Specifically, first, SNPs related to exposure were screened from summary statistics (P < 5e-8). Next, SNPs related to potential confounders were excluded. Considering that educational attainment, smoking, and alcohol consumption may be associated with both insomnia and BPH, and the fact that they impact numerous other phenotypes [17,18,19,20,21], we included these three phenotypes as potential confounders in this study. Source of summary statistics for the confounders and the relevant SNPs are exhibited in Supplementary Tables S2–S3. Next, SNPs exhibiting linkage disequilibrium (r2 < 0.001 within 10,000 kb) were eliminated and those with the smallest P-values were retained. In addition, all SNPs were not significantly associated with outcome (P > 5e-8). Ultimately, the strength of each IVs was assessed using F-statistics, and only IVs with F-statistics exceeding 10 could mitigate the weak IV bias.

Statistical analysis

IVW was the main MR approach to assess causality. Initially, the causal impact of the exposure on the outcome was evaluated using the Wald ratio method individually for each IV. Subsequently, a meta-analysis was conducted employing either fixed-effects or random-effects models [22]. The significance level was set at P < 0.05 to determine statistical significance. For causal relationships identified by IVW, a variety of sensitivity tests were performed to assess reliability. First, several additional MR methods, including MR-Egger [23], weighted median [24], maximum likelihood [25], and weighted mode [26], were employed for supplementing IVW. Subsequently, heterogeneity was calculated by Cochran’s Q test. Following this, both the MR-Egger intercept and MR-PRESSO global test were performed to assess horizontal pleiotropy. Finally, the leave-one-out test was performed to assess stability.

Replicate MR analysis

We further validated the causal effect of insomnia on BPH with an independent external GWAS summary statistics. Watanabe et al.‘s recent large-scale GWAS meta-analysis comprehensively integrated GWAS data on insomnia phenotypes from the UK Biobank and 23andMe [27]. We obtained summary statistics for insomnia GWAS in male participants of the study, including 222,753 male cases and 993,280 male controls. Data on male-specific SNPs significantly associated with insomnia were obtained from the Supplementary Table of the original manuscript. The procedures for IV selection, MR analysis, and sensitivity testing were consistent with those described previously in the current study.

Results

Identification of IVs for forward and reverse MR analysis

The IVs screening process for the forward MR analysis is shown in Supplementary Table S4. In the forward MR analysis, 7 to 87 SNPs were used as IVs proxying six sleep traits (Supplementary Table S5). The IVs screening process for the reverse MR analysis is shown in Supplementary Table S6. In the reverse MR analysis, 34 to 40 IVs representing BPH were used to evaluate the causal impact of BPH on six sleep traits (Supplementary Table S7). F-statistics of all IVs were > 10.

IVW approach identified bidirectional causality between Insomnia and BPH

In forward MR analysis, IVW approach indicated that genetically predicted insomnia symptom elevated BPH risk (odds ratio [OR] = 1.267, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.003–1.601, P = 0.048) (Fig. 2A). However, genetically predicted day time napping (OR = 1.190, 95% CI: 0.862–1.643, P = 0.290), daytime sleepiness (OR = 0.739, 95% CI: 0.371–1.470, P = 0.388), long sleep (OR = 0.137, 95% CI: 0.017–1.128, P = 0.065), short sleep (OR = 0.942, 95% CI: 0.386–2.298, P = 0.895), and sleep duration per hour (OR = 0.838, 95% CI: 0.682–1.031, P = 0.094) did not affect BPH (Fig. 2A). Subsequently, the IVW approach in reverse MR analysis indicated that genetically predicted liability to BPH elevated the incidence of insomnia (OR = 1.026, 95% CI: 1.000-1.052, P = 0.048) (Fig. 2B). Nevertheless, BPH did not causally impact the other five sleep traits (P > 0.05) (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

MR results identified by the IVW approach. (A) Forward MR analysis by IVW to assess the causal effects of six sleep traits on BPH. (B) Reverse MR analysis by IVW to assess the causal effects of BPH on six sleep traits

Sensitivity tests verified the reliability of MR results

The bidirectional causal association between insomnia and BPH was further validated by various sensitivity tests. First, four additional MR methods all showed consistent findings with IVW (OR > 1) (Table 1). Despite Cochran’s Q test indicating heterogeneity in the forward MR analysis (P < 0.05), it did not impact the MR inference as this study primarily employed the IVW random effects model (Table 2). In contrast, Cochran’s Q test indicated no heterogeneity in reverse MR analysis (P > 0.05) (Table 2). Subsequently, both the MR-Egger intercept test and the MR-PRESSO global test showed that the causal inference between insomnia and BPH was not significantly influenced by horizontal pleiotropy (P > 0.05) (Table 3). Ultimately, leave-one-out test demonstrates the stability, as excluding each IV does not lead to significant alterations in the results (Fig. 3).

Table 1 Identification of bidirectional causal relationship between insomnia and BPH by six distinct MR methods
Table 2 Assessment of heterogeneity by Cochran’s Q test
Table 3 Assessment of horizontal pleiotropy by MR-Egger intercept test and MR-PRESSO global test
Fig. 3
figure 3

Assessment of the stability of MR results by leave-one-out sensitivity test. (A) MR leave − one − out sensitivity analysis for insomnia on BPH in forward MR analysis. (B) MR leave − one − out sensitivity analysis for BPH on insomnia in reverse MR analysis

Results of replicate MR analysis

The IVs screening process for the reverse MR analysis is shown in Supplementary Table S8. Ultimately, 75 IVs proxying for insomnia were obtained for the replicate MR analysis (Supplementary Table S9). In the replicate MR analysis based on male participants, IVW approach showed that genetically predicted insomnia symptom significantly increased the risk of BPH (OR = 1.488, 95% CI: 1.096–2.022, P = 0.011), which was more remarkable than the effect in the initial forward analysis (Supplementary Table S10). In addition, the remaining four MR. The results of the other four supplementary MR methods showed the same directionality as IVW. In addition, Cochran’s Q test showed that the replicate analysis was not affected by significant heterogeneity (P > 0.05) (Supplementary Table S11), whereas the MR-Egger intercept test and MR-PRESSO global test showed that the replicate analysis was not affected by significant levels of horizontal pleiotropy (P > 0.05) (Supplementary Table S12). The leave-one-out test indicated the stability of the results (Supplementary Fig. S1).

Discussion

This MR study comprehensively assessed the causal associations between six sleep traits and BPH. Ultimately, a bidirectional positive causal relationship between genetically predicted insomnia symptom and liability to BPH was identified. Furthermore, various sensitivity analyses validated the reliability of the results.

Several observational investigations suggested an association between sleep traits and benign prostatic hyperplasia. An investigation involving middle-aged and elderly males in the Longitudinal Aging Study in India found a notable correlation between diminished sleep quality and elevated occurrences of BPH [6]. A cross-sectional study derived from the West China Natural Population Cohort Study revealed a substantial link between inadequate sleep quality and a heightened BPH risk, particularly prevalent among older male individuals [7]. Another cross-sectional study indicated a noteworthy correlation between shortened sleep duration and heightened susceptibility to BPH among middle-aged and elderly Chinese men [28]. The present MR study showed that prolonged insomnia significantly raises the risk of BPH, and BPH similarly heightens the risk of insomnia, thus providing more robust evidence for previous observational studies. More importantly, this study emphasizes the importance of improving sleep quality to reduce insomnia, thereby preventing BPH, and breaking the vicious cycle of insomnia-BPH-insomnia.

The bidirectional positive causal association between insomnia and BPH identified in our study could be rationalized by several mechanisms. A principal mechanism might be its influence on the regulation of hormones, particularly androgens such as testosterone [29]. The fragmentation of sleep seen with advancing age interrupts the circadian rhythm governing hormone release, including that of testosterone, which is known to have a significant role in BPH pathogenesis [29]. Studies indicate that nocturnal sleep time serves as a predictor for morning testosterone levels [30], underscoring the essential role of sufficient and uninterrupted sleep in maintaining hormone equilibrium. Furthermore, insomnia may result in the dysregulation of autonomic nervous system activity [31], a recognized pivotal factor in the progression of BPH [32]. Furthermore, insomnia might trigger elevate systemic inflammation [33], a condition implicated in the progression of BPH [34]. Moreover, sleep deficits are implicated in metabolic dysregulation, such as dysglycemia and insulin resistance [35], which, in turn, heightens the risk for BPH [36]. Another potential mechanism could be caused by depression, as previous studies have shown a bidirectional association of depression with both BPH and insomnia [37,38,39]. This complex mechanism may be further investigated in future multivariable MR analyses. Nevertheless, the pathways connecting insomnia and BPH have not yet been fully understood and warrant further investigations.

The current research exhibits several advantages. First, using MR analyses, the effects of varying lifetime levels of the six sleep traits on BPH were simulated, thus modeling long-term RCTs of sleep interventions. Second, the summary statistics of exposures and outcomes were derived from two distinct cohorts, reducing the high false-positive rate triggered by overlapping samples. Third, MR analysis was performed by screening IVs based on three MR core assumptions, and various sensitivity tests were implemented to increase the reliability of the results.

This study has several limitations that need to be clarified. First, this study was performed using GWAS summary statistics derived from European individuals. Consequently, the generalizability of the findings to other populations remains uncertain. Second, the data on sleep traits in the previous studies were obtained from questionnaires and might be influenced by recall bias. Third, the findings of this study solely provided suggestive correlational evidence due to lack of multiple testing correction, underscoring the necessity for future validation in larger cohorts. Finally, due to the inaccessibility of individual-level statistics, only summary data stratified by gender were available for replicate analysis, while analysis based on other clinical characteristics such as age was not feasible.

Conclusions

Overall, through bidirectional two-sample MR analysis, this study identified that a higher prevalence of genetically predicted insomnia symptoms may significantly increase the risk of BPH, while liability to BPH may in turn increases the incidence of insomnia. Therefore, improving sleep quality and reducing the risk of insomnia could be a crucial approach for the prevention of BPH.

Data availability

Source of summary statistics is shown in the Supplementary Material.

Abbreviations

BPH:

Benign prostatic hyperplasia

MR:

Mendelian randomization

IVs:

instrumental variables

GWAS:

genome-wide association study

RCTs:

randomized controlled trials

SNPs:

single-nucleotide polymorphisms

IVW:

inverse variance weighed

OR:

odds ratio

CI:

confidence interval

References

  1. Berry SJ, Coffey DS, Walsh PC, Ewing LL. The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. J Urol. 1984;132(3):474–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)49698-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gandaglia G, Briganti A, Gontero P, Mondaini N, Novara G, Salonia A, et al. The role of chronic prostatic inflammation in the pathogenesis and progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). BJU Int. 2013;112(4):432–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shvero A, Calio B, Humphreys MR, Das AK. HoLEP: the new gold standard for surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Can J Urol. 2021;28(S2):6–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parsons JK. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and male lower urinary tract symptoms: epidemiology and risk factors. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2010;5(4):212–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-010-0067-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bal K, Ayik S, Issi Y, Bolukbasi A, Akhan G. Sleep analysis of patients with nocturia and benign prostatic obstruction. Urology. 2012;80(2):383–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.12.067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ma K, Dong Q. Association between sleep quality and benign prostate hyperplasia among middle-aged and older men in India. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):1147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15972-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Li Y, Zhou X, Qiu S, Cai B, Wang S, Chen L, et al. Association of sleep quality with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia among men in China: a cross-sectional study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:938407. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.938407.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Madan Jha V. The prevalence of sleep loss and sleep disorders in young and old adults. Aging Brain. 2023;3:100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbas.2022.100057.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tufik S, Andersen ML, Bittencourt LR, Mello MT. Paradoxical sleep deprivation: neurochemical, hormonal and behavioral alterations. Evidence from 30 years of research. Anais Da Acad Brasileira De Ciencias. 2009;81(3):521–38. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0001-37652009000300016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hipólide DC, Suchecki D, Pimentel de Carvalho Pinto A, Chiconelli Faria E, Tufik S, Luz J. Paradoxical sleep deprivation and sleep recovery: effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity, energy balance and body composition of rats. J Neuroendocrinol. 2006;18(4):231–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2826.2006.01412.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanderson E, Glymour MM, Holmes MV, Kang H, Morrison J, Munafò MR, et al. Mendelian randomization. Nat Reviews Methods Primers. 2022;2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00092-5.

  12. Dashti HS, Daghlas I, Lane JM, Huang Y, Udler MS, Wang H, et al. Genetic determinants of daytime napping and effects on cardiometabolic health. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):900. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20585-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang H, Lane JM, Jones SE, Dashti HS, Ollila HM, Wood AR, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of self-reported daytime sleepiness identifies 42 loci that suggest biological subtypes. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3503. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11456-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Jansen PR, Watanabe K, Stringer S, Skene N, Bryois J, Hammerschlag AR, et al. Genome-wide analysis of insomnia in 1,331,010 individuals identifies new risk loci and functional pathways. Nat Genet. 2019;51(3):394–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0333-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dashti HS, Jones SE, Wood AR, Lane JM, van Hees VT, Wang H, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies genetic loci for self-reported habitual sleep duration supported by accelerometer-derived estimates. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08917-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurki MI, Karjalainen J, Palta P, Sipilä TP, Kristiansson K, Donner KM, et al. FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population. Nature. 2023;613(7944):508–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05473-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gellis LA, Lichstein KL, Scarinci IC, Durrence HH, Taylor DJ, Bush AJ, et al. Socioeconomic status and insomnia. J Abnorm Psychol. 2005;114(1):111–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.114.1.111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen LJ, Steptoe A, Chen YH, Ku PW, Lin CH. Physical activity, smoking, and the incidence of clinically diagnosed insomnia. Sleep Med. 2017;30:189–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2016.06.040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chakravorty S, Chaudhary NS, Brower KJ. Alcohol dependence and its Relationship with Insomnia and other Sleep disorders. Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research. 2016;40(11):2271–82; https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.13217.

  20. Platz EA, Rimm EB, Kawachi I, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, et al. Alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, and risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;149(2):106–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009775.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Galea S, Ahern J, Tracy M, Rudenstine S, Vlahov D. Education inequality and use of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;90(Suppl 1):S4–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.11.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pagoni P, Dimou NL, Murphy N, Stergiakouli E. Using mendelian randomisation to assess causality in observational studies. Evid Based Ment Health. 2019;22(2):67–71. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2019-300085.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Burgess S, Thompson SG. Interpreting findings from mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017;32(5):377–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-017-0255-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock PC, Burgess S. Consistent estimation in mendelian randomization with some Invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genet Epidemiol. 2016;40(4):304–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21965.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Milligan BG. Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness. Genetics. 2003;163(3):1153–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/163.3.1153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hartwig FP, Davey Smith G, Bowden J. Robust inference in summary data mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(6):1985–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyx102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Watanabe K, Jansen PR, Savage JE, Nandakumar P, Wang X, Hinds DA, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of insomnia prioritizes genes associated with metabolic and psychiatric pathways. Nat Genet. 2022;54(8):1125–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01124-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Xiong Y, Zhang Y, Zhang F, Wu C, Qin F, Yuan J. Reduced sleep duration increases the risk of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in middle-aged and elderly males: a national cross-sectional study. Aging male: Official J Int Soc Study Aging Male. 2022;25(1):159–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/13685538.2022.2079627.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wittert G. The relationship between sleep disorders and testosterone in men. Asian J Androl. 2014;16(2):262–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682x.122586.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Penev PD. Association between sleep and morning testosterone levels in older men. Sleep. 2007;30(4):427–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/30.4.427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Grimaldi D, Reid KJ, Papalambros NA, Braun RI, Malkani RG, Abbott SM, et al. Autonomic dysregulation and sleep homeostasis in insomnia. Sleep. 2021;44(6). https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaa274.

  32. McVary KT, Rademaker A, Lloyd GL, Gann P. Autonomic nervous system overactivity in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2005;174(4 Pt 1):1327–433. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000173072.73702.64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Motivala SJ. Sleep and inflammation: psychoneuroimmunology in the context of cardiovascular disease. Annals Behav Medicine: Publication Soc Behav Med. 2011;42(2):141–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9280-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fibbi B, Penna G, Morelli A, Adorini L, Maggi M. Chronic inflammation in the pathogenesis of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int J Androl. 2010;33(3):475–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.00972.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sharma S, Kavuru M. Sleep and metabolism: an overview. Int J Endocrinol. 2010;2010. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/270832.

  36. Breyer BN, Sarma AV. Hyperglycemia and insulin resistance and the risk of BPH/LUTS: an update of recent literature. Curr Urol Rep. 2014;15(12):462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-014-0462-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kwon JK, Chang IH. Pain, catastrophizing, and depression in chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Int Neurourol J. 2013;17(2):48–58. https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.2013.17.2.48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Pietrzyk B, Olszanecka-Glinianowicz M, Owczarek A, Gabryelewicz T, Almgren-Rachtan A, Prajsner A, et al. Depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015;47(3):431–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-0920-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Cai L, Bao Y, Fu X, Cao H, Baranova A, Zhang X, et al. Causal links between major depressive disorder and insomnia: a mendelian randomisation study. Gene. 2021;768:145271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2020.145271.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We extend our gratitude to the Sleep Disorder Knowledge Portal, Complex traits genetics lab, and FinnGen consortium for generously supplying the GWAS summary statistics utilized in this study.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Nannan Li, Dong Chen; Methodology: Nannan Li, Ke Yang, Liang Deng; Software: Ke Yang, Youjie Zeng; Validation: Ke Yang, Si Cao, Youjie Zeng; Formal analysis: Nannan Li, Ke Yang, Youjie Zeng; Investigation: Nannan Li, Liang Deng, Youjie Zeng; Resources: Liang Deng, Dong Chen; Data Curation: Nannan Li, Ke Yang; Writing – Original Draft: Nannan Li; Writing – Review & Editing: Liang Deng, Dong Chen; Visualization: Si Cao, Dong Chen; Supervision: Liang Deng, Dong Chen; Project administration: Liang Deng, Dong Chen.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was a secondary analysis of public data and therefore did not require additional ethics approval or consent to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, N., Yang, K., Deng, L. et al. Mendelian randomization study supports positive bidirectional causal relationships between genetically predicted insomnia symptom and liability to benign prostatic hyperplasia. BMC Urol 24, 91 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01474-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01474-z

Keywords