Skip to main content

Landscape of peripheral immunity in patients with upper urinary tract urolithiasis and the underlying correlations with renal function

Abstract

Introduction

Inflammatory and immunological responses are reported involved in the pathogenesis and progression of obstructive nephropathy (ON). This study was designed to investigate the characteristics of peripheral immunity in patients with upper urinary tract urolithiasis and analyze the underlying associations with renal function.

Methods

Patients with unilateral upper urinary tract urolithiasis meeting the operation indications were prospectively enrolled. Preoperative circulating immune cells and inflammatory cytokines were detected in our clinical laboratory, and the indicators of renal function and calculi related parameters were particularly recorded. Patients were sectionalized into subgroups on the basis of the lesion of calculi. Characteristics of peripheral immunity in each subgroup were investigated by statistical approaches, and the underlying correlations with the degree of hydronephrosis (HN) and renal function were discussed in corresponding group.

Results

Patients with ureteral calculi presented severer HN compared with renal calculi, especial middle ureteral calculi, acting as the chief culprit of ON, exhibiting the highest serum creatine and blood urea nitrogen, most impaired estimated glomerular filtration rate, and severest HN. In addition, serum interleukin-8 (IL-8) and IL-6 were demonstrated presenting statistical differences between ureteral calculi and renal calculi patients, exhibiting underlying values in comprehending ON. However, circulating immune cells were demonstrated no obvious differences among groups.

Conclusions

Circulating inflammatory cytokines, referred in particular to serum IL-8 and IL-6 were partially associated with kidney injury in patients with upper urinary tract urolithiasis. But the specific influences and mechanisms between them needed to be investigated furthermore.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Obstructive nephropathy (ON) is a relatively common entity in clinical settings, which could occur at all ages [1]. In adult patients, urolithiasis is a dominating etiology, and would contribute to impairing the function of the affected kidney if the obstruction couldn’t be relieved in time, presenting as an increase in pressure in the proximal tube, hydronephrosis (HN), decrease of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and ultimately progressing to renal fibrosis [1].

Inflammatory and immunological responses are widely reported involved in the pathogenesis and progression of ON as well as interstitial fibrosis [2]. Several studies verified that inflammatory cytokines infiltrated in renal tissues, for instance monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-1β, etc. were closely associated with the severity of injury of the affected kidney and even the degree of renal fibrosis in unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) animal models [3,4,5,6]. Others reported immune cells activation and infiltration in the impaired kidney of UUO mice were also common pathogenic mechanisms of kidney injury [7,8,9]. However, whether circulating immune cells and inflammatory cytokines were correlated with kidney injury in ON in clinical settings is indistinct. Thus, this study was designed to investigate the underlying associations between peripheral immunity and kidney injury in patients with unilateral upper urinary tract urolithiasis.

Methods

Study design and patient selection

This was a prospective cohort study conducted on patients who were diagnosed with unilateral upper urinary tract urolithiasis and receiving ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) surgery between Jan. 2022 and May. 2023 at our institution. Inclusion criteria were (1) newly diagnosed unilateral single ureteral (study group) or renal calculi (< 2 cm, control group); (2) without contralateral urolithiasis; (3) no concomitant with ipsilateral renal or ureteral calculus; (4) no medical history of urolithiasis; (5) no pretreatments for urolithiasis, like DJ stent dwelling; (6) adult patients (age ≥ 18 years). Exclusion criteria were (1) functional or anatomic solitary kidney; (2) abnormal preoperative eGFR (< 60 mL/min/1.73 m2); (3) with medical history of kidney insufficiency or renal atrophy or HN; (4) with uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), heart failure, intrinsic kidney disease, etc. that could deteriorate the residual renal function; (5) with urinary tract infection (UTI), inflammatory disease, immune-mediated disease, medical history of malignancy, or receiving immunotherapy, etc [10]. The flow chart of the study design was shown in Fig. 1. Patients with ureterostenosis or pyonephrosis of the affected side that were found during the operation were excluded ultimately.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of the study design. Abbreviations DM diabetes mellitus, HN hydronephrosis, URL ureteroscopic lithotripsy, UTI urinary tract infection

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee of our hospital and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

HN and renal function evaluation

Patients were requested to have available preoperative imaging to assess the presence and degree of ipsilateral HN. Imaging was conducted within 24 h before URL surgery using computer tomography (CT) with or without contrast, or renal ultrasound. If more than 1 imaging modality was available for a patient, preference was given to CT [11]. HN was defined as the dilation of calyx or renal pelvis (in the posterior-anterior plane), with or without renal parenchyma atrophy, and was assigned and assessed as a continuous variable [12]. Renal function was systematically evaluated by serum creatine (sCr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), estimated GFR (eGFR) and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) 24 h before surgery. In order to avoid iatrogenic hurt to patients, radionuclide scintigraphy was not routinely conducted, unless explicit indications were presented.

Peripheral immunity assessment

Peripheral immunity was routinely detected in our clinical laboratory. The items included and were limited to circulating immune cells, i.e., CD3+T cell, CD4+T cell, CD8+T cell, natural killer (NK) cell, B cell and T regulatory cell (Treg), and inflammatory cytokines, like IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-2R and TNF-α. Otherwise, other indicators, for instance, macrophage, TGF-β, IL-18 and MCP-1, etc., could not be detected. In brief, inflammatory cytokines were detected by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) after serum was extracted, and flow cytometry (FCM) was utilized to analyze circulating immune cell [13]. All procedures were conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Data acquisition and grouping

Specific medical information of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), urolithiasis related parameters (size, lesion, CT value, etc.), preoperative renal function, circulating immune cells and peripheral inflammatory cytokines etc. were tested and recorded. Generally, patients were classified into ureteral calculi group (study group) and renal calculi group (control group). And for more finely, patients were furthermore grouped to calices, pelvis, upper ureter, middle ureter and lower ureter subgroup on the basis of the lesion of calculi.

Statistical analysis

Statistical comparisons were performed using the statistical software GraphPad Prism 10 (GraphPad Software, CA, USA). Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Intergroup differences were tested using the Student’s t test or analysis of variance (ANOVA). Tukey’s multiple comparison test was further chosen for post-test of ANOVA. Categorical variables were expressed as frequency (percentage), and Chi-square test was used to test the intergroup differences. Pearson correlation analysis was applied to analyze the interdependency between variables. Statistical significance was defined as a p < 0.05.

Results

Demographics and clinical characteristics

172 patients were ultimately enrolled and systematically reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the lesion of calculi, i.e., renal calculi group (control group, 29 patients) and ureteral calculi group (study group, 143 patients). Recorded clinical and demographic characteristics of all patients as well as the integrated data were shown in Table 1. Patients with renal calculi tended to larger calculi size (12.9 ± 5.9 mm vs. 7.3 ± 3.0 mm, p < 0.0001), longer disease course (defined as the duration from the time of the diagnosis of urolithiasis to enrollment, 156.7 ± 365.3 d vs. 47.6 ± 157.0 d, p = 0.0103), higher uNGAL level (33.8 ± 46.8 ng/mL vs. 22.0 ± 20.9 ng/mL, p = 0.0333), but lighter HN severity (4.5 ± 5.5 mm vs. 16.9 ± 12.9 mm, p < 0.0001) when compared with ureteral calculi group, implying that patients with ureteral calculi were more tending to choose surgical treatment.

Table 1 Characteristics of the study population (preoperative data, n = 172)

Preoperative renal function

Preoperative renal function of all patients were within normal limits according to the enrollment criteria (eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). No statistical differences were found in sCr, BUN and eGFR between groups, though patients with ureteral calculi presented severer HN (Table 1). Regretfully, radionuclide scintigraphy was not routinely conducted in this study, it was out of the question to assess the differential renal function of the affected kidney.

In addition, patients with renal calculi presented higher preoperative uNGAL level than ureteral calculi (Table 1), which was not as expected. But when the obstruction was relieved, uNGAL dramatically elevated in patients with ureteral calculi (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Variation of uNGAL after URL surgery. 91 patients in ureteral calculi group and 17 in renal calculi group had complete and comparable data of preoperative and postoperative uNGAL. (A) Variation of uNGAL in renal calculi group, with the preoperative value of 23.69 ± 28.67 ng/mL and postoperative value of 25.52 ± 18.20 ng/mL, p=0.8197; (B) Variation of uNGAL in ureteral calculi group, with the preoperative value of 21.88 ± 21.02 ng/mL and postoperative value of 30.65 ± 22.49 ng/mL, p=0.0051. ** Meant p < 0.01, were assumed as statistically significant. Abbreviations uNGAL urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, URL ureteroscopic lithotripsy

Landscape of peripheral immunity in upper urinary tract urolithiasis

Circulating immune cells showed no statistical differences between renal calculi group and ureteral calculi group, and even in the further splitted subgroups according to the detailed anatomic lesion of calculi, i.e., calices, pelvis, upper ureter, middle ureter and lower ureter (Tables 2 and 3). But inflammatory cytokines were mined with latent values and presented differences. 86 patients (60.1%) in ureteral calculi group exhibited elevated serum IL-6 (< 2 pg/mL was defined as normal), while only 10 (34.5%) patients showed elevated IL-6 in renal calculi group (p < 0.05, Table 2). Though no significant differences were recorded in comparison between renal calculi and ureteral calculi, IL-8 also rendered a similar tendency as IL-6 (51.7 ± 153.8 pg/mL in ureteral calculi and 26.7 ± 34.9 pg/mL in renal calculi group, p = 0.3858, Table 2).

Table 2 Landscape of peripheral immunity (preoperative data, n = 172)
Table 3 Subgroup analysis according to the anatomic lesion of calculi (preoperative data, n = 172)

Middle ureteral calculi was more easily to elicit ON

As mentioned before and generally accepted, ureteral calculi was more likely to cause HN and kidney injury when compared with renal calculi. Most noteworthy was the middle ureteral calculi. Results from Table 3 indicated that middle ureteral calculi was the biggest culprit of ON, exhibiting the highest sCr (80.8 ± 16.1 µmol/L), BUN (6.6 ± 1.9 mmol/L), HN (24.7 ± 19.9 mm), and the most impaired eGFR (82.5 ± 16.1 mL/min/1.73 m2, all p < 0.05).

IL-8 and IL-6 were closely associated with kidney injury

Circulating immune cells were demonstrated no obvious correlations with HN and impaired renal function. However, inflammatory cytokines, referred in particular to serum IL-8 and IL-6, presented underlying values in comprehending ON. The highest serum concentration of IL-8 (147.1 ± 278.7 pg/mL, p = 0.0306) was found in the subgroup of middle ureteral calculi when compared with others, which was in positive accordance with the degree of HN and impaired renal function. However, no statistical linear correlations were demonstrated (Table 3; Fig. 3A and D).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Correlation of IL-8/IL-6 and renal function. (A-D) Pearson correlation analysis was applied to analyze the interdependency between IL-8 and indicators of renal function, i.e., HN (A), sCr (B), BUN (C), and eGFR (D). No statistical linear correlations were demonstrated. (E) Descriptive presentation of the percent of patients with elevated IL-6, and the degree of HN in each subgroup. Abbreviations BUN blood urea nitrogen, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, HN hydronephrosis, IL-6 interleukin-6, IL-8 interleukin-8, sCr serum creatinine

In addition, as mentioned above, a higher proportion of patients was seen with elevated serum IL-6 level in the group of ureteral calculi, but it seemed that it was negatively correlated with HN and impaired renal function in the subgroup analysis of ureteral calculi based on the detailed lesion of calculi, that was patients in the subgroup of middle ureteral calculi presented the lowest proportion of patients with elevated IL-6 when compared with upper and lower ureteral calculi subgroup (Table 3; Fig. 3E).

Discussion

It has been widely recognized that inflammation plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiological processes of various forms of kidney injury, and kidney injury should be considered to have an immunological component. TGF-β1, TNF-α, MCP-1, IL-10, IL-8, IL-6, et al [14, 15] were the mainly focused inflammatory cytokines. Among all these cytokines, some have been investigated as sensitive biomarkers of kidney injury, for instance IL-6, IL-8 and IL-18, especial for the predicting of contrast-induced nephropathy, renal ischemia/reperfusion injury (RIRI), and kidney injury after cardiac or liver surgery, etc [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Jeffrey et al. [23]. reported that serum IL-8, IL-6 and urine IL-18, IL-6, IL-8 were higher in acute kidney injury (AKI) patients within the first 24 h following liver transplantation. Han et al. [24]. found AKI patients had significantly elevated serum contents of IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10, relative to the control group in older people (≥ 65 years) in the intensive care unit. Especial for IL-6 and IL-8, a strong correlation was observed between them with AKI (odds ratio (OR) = 36.4 and 18.2, respectively). For each increase in the natural log unit in the levels of IL-6 and IL-8, the risk of developing AKI elevated by 36.4% and 18.2%, respectively [24]. However, whether serum inflammatory cytokines could be utilized for predicting kidney injury in patients with ON was still ambiguous, though Liao et al [4] proved the expression of inflammatory cytokines in blood of UUO model was also an indicator of kidney injury. The results of our study demonstrated that serum IL-6 and IL-8 could also be used as biomarkers of kidney injury in ON, which filled a gap in this field.

IL-6 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that has been shown to be elevated in both serum and urine in both patients and animal models of AKI [16, 17, 19, 20]. IL-8 is an endothelial-derived chemokine and has also been demonstrated to be elevated in the setting of renal allograft dysfunction [25] and AKI diseases [18, 21, 22]. As to the specific mechanisms of how serum IL-6 and IL-8 mediated kidney injury, literature reports vary. Broadly speaking, systemic inflammation affects the kidney via pro-inflammatory cytokines and infiltration of inflammatory cells [26]. For IL-6, IL-6/ERK signaling pathway [5], IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway [27], and IL-6/IL-6R axis [28], et al. participate in the pathological process of kidney injury and subsequent renal fibrosis. For IL-8, the underlying mechanism is that it acts as chemo-attractive action toward neutrophils by binding to IL-8 receptor and stimulating their response [29]. However, the specific mechanisms of how they involved in the pathophysiological processes of kidney injury in ON/UUO still needed to be verified and investigated by both animal and clinical researches.

NGAL is a 25-kDa protein, usually reabsorbed at the site of proximal tubule and secreted in the thick ascending limb. The increased levels in urine/serum can be detected, reflecting renal tubular injury and utilized as a potential biomarker of several pathologic conditions (e.g., AKI, diabetic nephropathy, IgA nephropathy, contrast nephropathy and obstructive hydronephrosis (UPJO)) [30,31,32,33,34,35]. Suchiang et al. [35] demonstrated that children with obstructive HN in whom surgery opted had higher values of uNGAL when compared with patients with non-obstructive HN who were treated conservatively (18.62 ± 13.75 ng/mg Cr vs. 10.92 ± 5.63 ng/mg Cr, p < 0.001), and after the obstruction was relieved, the value presented a mild decline. But the results of our study draw a distinct-different conclusion. The possible cause was that we did not normalize uNGAL concentration to contemporaneous urine creatinine (uCr) concentration because urinary creatinine excretion in the setting of AKI is dynamic and its inclusion in the assessment of urinary biomarkers has been challenged [36]. Normalized levels of a biomarker reflecting tubular injury can be influenced by dynamic variations in uCr excretion rate when GFR changes. Actual timed urine collections from hospitalized patients with changing GFR and/or critical illness exhibited variability in uCr excretion rates across and within individuals [36]. Thus, whether uNGAL could be used as a biomarker for predicting renal insufficiency in UUO/ON still needs to be verified.

In addition to the inflammatory factors mentioned above, immune cells and their various subtypes also play significant roles in the physiological and pathological processes of renal injury. For instance, immune cells such as neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes are involved in the inflammatory response following renal injury, contributing to the damage and repair processes of the kidney through the release of inflammatory mediators and cytokines [37, 38]. In models of ON and UUO, the infiltration of immune cells has been observed and is correlated with the severity of renal fibrosis and inflammatory responses [39]. Although no significant differences in the number of circulating immune cells were observed among the groups of stone patients in our study, this does not exclude the role of immune cells within the local renal tissue. Local immune responses may differ from those in the circulation due to the influence of the local microenvironment, such as ischemia, oxidative stress, and concentrations of inflammatory mediators [40, 41]. Therefore, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the role of immune cells in renal injury, future research may need to focus on the infiltration and activation status of immune cells within local renal tissues, as well as their relationship with the levels of biomarkers in urine/serum. Additionally, investigating the specific roles and interactions of immune cell subtypes (such as T cells, B cells, natural killer cells, etc.) in renal injury may help elucidate the complex mechanisms of renal damage and provide clues for the development of new therapeutic strategies.

A potential limitation of this study is that though it was a prospective study, it conducted in a single institution that might undergo selection bias. Secondly, the overall sample size of patients with renal calculi was small, leading to a small pool of patients for analysis. This blemish might diminish our statistical power and preclude a more robust calculation of our biomarker’s predictive abilities. Thirdly, the immune items that detected in this study were not comprehensive, contributing to the relatively influenced potency of our conclusions. It is important to note that the markers used in this study for peripheral immunity assessment were all derived from serum. In some cases, inflammation may remain localized without becoming a systemic response. Therefore, urinary markers might more accurately reflect local kidney inflammation. This represents a limitation of our study, and future research should consider including the evaluation of urinary markers. Fourthly, it was widely recognized UUO won’t significantly influence total renal function. However, we didn’t assess the split renal function (SRF), which would also diminish our statistical power and reduce the comparability with other studies on the associations of inflammation and AKI. Finally, as reported, serum IL-6 and IL-8 are sensitive biomarkers of kidney injury, which rise quickly in response to AKI may have already peaked and began normalizing by the time we assessed them. For the disease course of urolithiasis in our study varied from 7 h to 1800d, the degree of elevation may underestimate the peak value and thereby diminish our diagnostic power. Consequently, further multi-centric, larger-scale and better-designed clinical studies as well as animal studies to investigate the mechanisms will be expectant.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study demonstrated that circulating inflammatory cytokines, referred in particular to serum IL-8 and IL-6 were partially associated with kidney injury in patients with upper urinary tract urolithiasis, and might serve as biomarkers for kidney injury in patients with ON, providing a potential avenue for early diagnosis and treatment. However, more extensive researches are needed to fully understand the underlying mechanisms and to validate these findings in larger and more diverse patient populations.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Yunteng Huang, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Klahr S. Obstructive nephropathy. Intern Med. 2000;39(5):355–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Banerjee S, Wong AC, Yan X, Wu B, Zhao H, Tibshirani RJ, et al. Early detection of unilateral ureteral obstruction by desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):11007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen W, Yuan H, Cao W, Wang T, Chen W, Yu H, et al. Blocking interleukin-6 trans-signaling protects against renal fibrosis by suppressing STAT3 activation. Theranostics. 2019;9(14):3980–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Liao Y, Tan RZ, Li JC, Liu TT, Zhong X, Yan Y, et al. Isoliquiritigenin attenuates UUO-Induced renal inflammation and fibrosis by inhibiting Mincle/Syk/NF-Kappa B Signaling Pathway. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020;14:1455–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang L, Guo J, Yu N, Liu Y, Song H, Niu J, et al. Tocilizumab mimotope alleviates kidney injury and fibrosis by inhibiting IL-6 signaling and ferroptosis in UUO model. Life Sci. 2020;261:118487.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang J, Ge S, Wang Y, Liu Y, Qiu L, Li J, et al. Puerarin alleviates UUO-Induced inflammation and fibrosis by regulating the NF-κB P65/STAT3 and TGFβ1/Smads signaling pathways. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021;15:3697–708.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Christensen M, Nørgård M, Jensen MS, Møller BK, Nørregaard R. Metformin modulates immune cell infiltration into the kidney during unilateral ureteral obstruction in mice. Physiol Rep. 2019;7(13):e14141.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lv LL, Wang C, Li ZL, Cao JY, Zhong X, Feng Y, et al. SAP130 released by damaged tubule drives necroinflammation via miRNA-219c/Mincle signaling in acute kidney injury. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(10):866.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Qiu Y, Cao Y, Tu G, Li J, Su Y, Fang F, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells alleviate renal fibrosis progression via regulation of CCL5-CCR5 Axis. Front Immunol. 2021;12:698894.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Li Q, Huang Y, Zhang L, Duan L, Qian S. Perioperative anemia predicts kidney injury after partial nephrectomy. Investig Clin Urol. 2022;63(5):514–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung PH, Krabbe LM, Darwish OM, Westerman ME, Bagrodia A, Gayed BA, et al. Degree of hydronephrosis predicts adverse pathological features and worse oncologic outcomes in patients with high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. Urol Oncol. 2014;32(7):981–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Qian S, Liang C, Ding Y, Wang C, Shen H. Preoperative hydronephrosis predicts adverse pathological features and postoperative survival in patients with high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Jan-Feb;47(1):159–68.

  13. Ford PJ. Immunological techniques: ELISA, flow cytometry, and immunohistochemistry. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;666:327–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jin Y, Liu R, Xie J, Xiong H, He JC, Chen N. Interleukin-10 deficiency aggravates kidney inflammation and fibrosis in the unilateral ureteral obstruction mouse model. Lab Invest. 2013;93(7):801–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang J, Li J, Tan R, He X, Lin X, Zhong X, et al. Protocatechualdehyde attenuates obstructive nephropathy through inhibiting lncRNA9884 induced inflammation. Phytother Res. 2021;35(3):1521–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kielar ML, John R, Bennett M, Richardson JA, Shelton JM, Chen L, et al. Maladaptive role of IL-6 in ischemic acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(11):3315–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chawla LS, Seneff MG, Nelson DR, Williams M, Levy H, Kimmel PL, et al. Elevated plasma concentrations of IL-6 and elevated APACHE II score predict acute kidney injury in patients with severe sepsis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2(1):22–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liangos O, Kolyada A, Tighiouart H, Perianayagam MC, Wald R, Jaber BL. Interleukin-8 and acute kidney injury following cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective cohort study. Nephron Clin Pract. 2009;113(3):c148–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu KD, Altmann C, Smits G, Krawczeski CD, Edelstein CL, Devarajan P, et al. Serum interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 are early biomarkers of acute kidney injury and predict prolonged mechanical ventilation in children undergoing cardiac surgery: a case-control study. Crit Care. 2009;13(4):R104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Dennen P, Altmann C, Kaufman J, Klein CL, Andres-Hernando A, Ahuja NH, et al. Urine interleukin-6 is an early biomarker of acute kidney injury in children undergoing cardiac surgery. Crit Care. 2010;14(5):R181.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Borst C, Xia S, Bistrup C, Tepel M. Interleukin-8 transcripts in mononuclear cells determine impaired graft function after kidney transplantation. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(2):e0117315.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kadi FA, Yuniati T, Sribudiani Y, Rachmadi D. The association of rs187238, rs19465518 and rs1946519 IL-8 polymorphisms with acute kidney injury in preterm infants. Biomed (Taipei). 2021;11(4):43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sirota JC, Walcher A, Faubel S, Jani A, McFann K, Devarajan P, et al. Urine IL-18, NGAL, IL-8 and serum IL-8 are biomarkers of acute kidney injury following liver transplantation. BMC Nephrol. 2013;14:17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Han L, Ren RR, Wan KL, Yang L, Kang JQ. Plasma inflammatory factors in older people predict acute kidney injury: a case-control study. Eur Geriatr Med. 2019;10(6):905–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kwon O, Molitoris BA, Pescovitz M, Kelly KJ. Urinary actin, interleukin-6, and interleukin-8 may predict sustained ARF after ischemic injury in renal allografts. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41(5):1074–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kimura T, Isaka Y, Yoshimori T. Autophagy and kidney inflammation. Autophagy. 2017;13(6):997–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang J, Xiong M, Fan Y, Liu C, Wang Q, Yang D, et al. Mecp2 protects kidney from ischemia-reperfusion injury through transcriptional repressing IL-6/STAT3 signaling. Theranostics. 2022;12(8):3896–910.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Nechemia-Arbely Y, Barkan D, Pizov G, Shriki A, Rose-John S, Galun E, et al. IL-6/IL-6R axis plays a critical role in acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19(6):1106–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Neri F, Puviani L, Tsivian M, Prezzi D, Pacilé V, Cavallari G et al. Protective effect of an inhibitor of interleukin-8 (meraxin) from ischemia and reperfusion injury in a rat model of kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2007 Jul-Aug;39(6):1771-2.

  30. Bolignano D, Donato V, Coppolino G, Campo S, Buemi A, Lacquaniti A, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) as a marker of kidney damage. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;52(3):595–605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Buonafine M, Martinez-Martinez E, Jaisser F. More than a simple biomarker: the role of NGAL in cardiovascular and renal diseases. Clin Sci (Lond). 2018;132(9):909–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Satirapoj B. Tubulointerstitial biomarkers for Diabetic Nephropathy. J Diabetes Res. 2018;2018:2852398.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Anand S, Bajpai M, Khanna T, Kumar A. Urinary biomarkers as point-of-care tests for predicting progressive deterioration of kidney function in congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract: trefoil family factors (TFFs) as the emerging biomarkers. Pediatr Nephrol. 2021;36(6):1465–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tsakogiannis D, Kalogera E, Zagouri F, Zografos E, Balalis D, Bletsa G. Determination of FABP4, RBP4 and the MMP-9/NGAL complex in the serum of women with breast cancer. Oncol Lett. 2021;21(2):85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Suchiang B, Pathak M, Saxena R, Sharma S, Mittal A, Nayak S, et al. Role of urinary Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL), Monocyte chemoattractant Protein-1(MCP-1), and Interleukin-6(IL-6) as biomarkers in pediatric patients with hydronephrosis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2022;38(11):1635–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Waikar SS, Sabbisetti VS, Bonventre JV. Normalization of urinary biomarkers to creatinine during changes in glomerular filtration rate. Kidney Int. 2010;78(5):486–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sato Y, Takahashi M, Yanagita M. Pathophysiology of AKI to CKD progression. Semin Nephrol. 2020;40(2):206–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Xiao W, Lu Z, Liu Y, Hua T, Zhang J, Hu J, et al. Influence of the initial neutrophils to lymphocytes and platelets ratio on the incidence and severity of Sepsis-Associated Acute kidney Injury: a double robust estimation based on a large public database. Front Immunol. 2022;13:925494.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Tezcan N, Özdemir-Kumral ZN, Özkan Yenal N, Çilingir-Kaya ÖT, Virlan AT, Özbeyli D, et al. Nesfatin-1 treatment preserves antioxidant status and attenuates renal fibrosis in rats with unilateral ureteral obstruction. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2022;37(7):1238–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Cao Q, Wang R, Wang Y, Niu Z, Chen T, Wang C, et al. Regulatory innate lymphoid cells suppress innate immunity and reduce renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 2020;97(1):130–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Goto H, Kinoshita M, Oshima N. Heatstroke-induced acute kidney injury and the innate immune system. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1250457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the colleagues in the department of clinical laboratory in Xinhua Hospital for their work and contributions.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82000638). The sponsor played no role in the study design, methods, data collection, analysis, and preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SB Qian: study design, data collection and management, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing. YD Pan: study design, data collection, data analysis, manuscript editing. Q Li: study design, data collection, data analysis, manuscript editing. LY Zhang: study design, data collection. LJ Duan: study design, manuscript editing. Y Xu: study design, data collection. JW Cao: data collection, manuscript editing. XG Cui: study design, data management, data analysis, manuscript editing, supervision. YT Huang: study design, data management, data analysis, manuscript editing, supervision.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xingang Cui or Yunteng Huang.

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee of Xinhua Hospital and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. This study was approved by Ethics Committee of Xinhua Hospital.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qian, S., Pan, Y., Li, Q. et al. Landscape of peripheral immunity in patients with upper urinary tract urolithiasis and the underlying correlations with renal function. BMC Urol 24, 169 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01556-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01556-y

Keywords