Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Urology

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Renal cell carcinoma with intramyocardial metastases

BMC Urology201414:73

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-14-73

Received: 22 March 2014

Accepted: 5 August 2014

Published: 6 September 2014

Abstract

Background

Cardiac metastases from renal cell carcinoma without vena caval involvement are extremely rare with a limited number of cases reported in the worldwide literature until now. Nevertheless, this rare location of metastasis may significantly influence patient treatment and prognosis. Cooperation between oncology, cardiology, and urology teams are indispensable in cases of patients suffering from intramyocardial tumors. For these individuals, treatment guidelines based on large-scale studies are unavailable and only case/case series analysis may provide clinicians with decision assistance.

Case presentation

In this paper, we report a case of a 50-year-old Caucasian male diagnosed with a 10.2 × 10.3 × 10.0 cm lower pole left renal mass in January 2002. He was subsequently treated with immunochemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and mTOR inhibitors (mTORIs) - that is sunitinib, everolimus, and sorafenib. In March 2012, contrast-enhancing tumors in the left myocardium (22 mm) and in the interventricular septum (26 mm) were seen on CT. Cardiology testing was conducted and the patient was treated with pazopanib with a profound response. Overall survival since the clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) diagnosis was 11 years 2 months and since diagnosis of multiple heart metastases was 1 year.

Conclusions

Cardiac metastases present a unique disease course in renal cell carcinoma. Cardiac metastases may remain asymptomatic, as in the case of this patient at the time of diagnosis. The most common cardiac presentation of renal cell carcinoma is hypertension, but other cardiac presentations include shortness of breath, cough, and arrhythmias. Targeted systemic therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors may be useful for this group of patients, but necrosis in the myocardium can result in tamponade and death. Regular cardiac magnetic resonance imaging scans are required for treatment monitoring.

Keywords

Renal cell carcinomaMyocardiumMetastasisPazopanibAxitinib

Background

Rare locations of metastasis may significantly influence patient treatment and prognosis. For these individuals, treatment guidelines based on large-scale studies are unavailable, and only case/case series analysis may provide clinicians with decision assistance. The incidence of primary and secondary heart tumors in unselected pathology necropsy reports is about 0.17% with secondary tumors more common. Secondary cardiac tumors are often found incidentally in even up to 20% of patients with metastatic cancer, sarcoma, or lymphoma [1]. Metastases spread to the pericardium, myocardium, and endocardium in descending order of frequency [2].

In general, cardiac metastases are 20 to 40 times more common than primary cardiac malignancies, and have been reported in different studies in approximately 2%to 18% of cases at autopsies. Intramyocardial metastases arise most often in the course of malignant melanoma, leukemia, lymphoma, and lung, esophageal and breast cancers [3, 4]. At the same time, heart involvement via the inferior vena cava (IVC) is a well-known phenomenon in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cases. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is known for invading the renal vein and further promoting tumor thrombosis of the vena cava and even the right atrium [1]. For these patients, long-term outcome after radical surgical treatment with RCC and tumor thrombus extension reaching up to the right atrium justifies an extensive procedure with median survival (including in-hospital mortality) of 25 months. Cardiopulmonary bypass with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest allows safe and precise extirpation of all intracaval and intracardiac tumor mass [5]. Manual repositioning of the tumor thrombus out of the right atrium into the inferior vena cava on the beating heart is also a safe and feasible approach with low risk of tumor thrombembolization [6].

In the absence of IVC involvement, cardiac metastases are exceptional in ccRCC with a limited number of cases reported in the worldwide literature (Table 1) [3]. No cases of well-documented cardiology diagnostics or oncological follow-ups with noted progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have been described in the literature before (Tables 1 and 2). No such cases have been reported in clinical trial of recently widely used sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib or axitinib [710]. In this report, we present the first case of a patient with intramyocardial metastases treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), who was carefully monitored.
Table 1

Blood test results on diagnosis and treatment of presented case

Blood test

16.04.

01.08.

02.08.

08.01.

30.01.

15.02.

2012

2012

2012

2013

2013

2013

CK

47

49

58

20

16

16

(N = 55-70) [U/l]

CKMB

39

11

13

13

11

23

(N = 0–16) [U/l]

Troponin I

0.070

0.055

0.066

0.097

0.076

0.076

(N <0.035, MI > 0.12) [ng/ml]

NT-proBNP

799.4

-

-

-

1875.0

1879.3

N < 125 [pg/ml]

LDH

243

-

178

-

134

196

(135–232) [U/l]

Treatment

Pazopanib

IFN

IFN

Axitinib

BSC

BSC

Table 2

Summary of all reported cardiac intramyocardial metastases in clear cell renal cancer and the course of disease in those patients

Case no

Localization

Reference

Years from nephrectomy

Signs or symptoms

Diagnostic method

Treatment; treatment efficacy

1

LV

[11]

23

Weight loss

CT, TTE, MRI, CA

ND

2

LV

[12]

18

Dyspnea

CT, CA

Surgery - successful, 6 years follow-up

3

LV

[13]

7

Chest pain

TTE, TEE, CT, B

Chemotherapy - no response

4

LV

[4]

0

ND

PET-CT

ND

5

LV

[14]

ND

Dyspnea

CT, TTE

ND

6

LV, PE

[3]

8/12

Dyspnea, asthenia, and inferior limb edema, peripheral cyanosis

TTE

No

7

LV, PE

[15]

ND

ND

ND

Surgery - successful

8

RA

[16]

ND

Asymptomatic

TTE, CT

Surgery - successful

9

RA, LA, LV, PE

[13]

7

Endocarditis

TTE, CT, CA

Chemotherapy - no response

10

RV

[17]

19

ND

ND

Surgery - successful

11

RV

[18]

18

Asymptomatic

PET-CT

Sunitinib, everolimus - successful PR 6 months

12

RV

[1]

4.5

Arrhythmia, tachycardia

MRI, EBCT, CA, ECG, TEECG

Immunotherapy - no response

13

RV

[19]

5

Congestive heart failure (NYHA class III)

MRI, CT, CA, TEE

Echo-guided coil embolization - successful, 19 months follow-up

14

RV

[20]

0

Pansystolic murmur

TTE, MRI

ND

15

RV

[21]

0

Syncope, T wave abnormality, prolonged QT interval

ECG, TTE

Surgery - successful

16

RV

[22]

ND

Presyncope

TTE, B

ND

17

RV

[23]

ND

Asymptomatic

ND

ND

18

RV

[24]

ND

ND

X-ray

Surgery – died

19

RV

[25]

ND

Dyspnea

Post-mortem diagnosis

ND

20

RV, SE

[26]

4

cardiac murmur, monomorphic ventricular tachycardia

TTE

Sunitinib, ICD

21

SE

[2]

20

Raynaud’s-like phenomena, systolic ejection murmur

TTE, MRI, TEE, B

Surgery -successful

Legend: TTE - Transthoracic echocardiography; TEE – transesophageal echocardiography, PA – pulmonary arteries, RA – right atrium, RV – right ventricle, SE- septum, CA - Coronary angiography, B- biopsy; ICD - implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, ND – no data available; EBCT - electron-beam CT; TEECG – trans -esophageal ECG; S-S; M-M; PE - pericardial effusion.

Case presentation

We report a case of a 50-year-old Caucasian male who was diagnosed with a 10.2 × 10.3 × 10.0 cm lower pole left renal mass in January 2002. Subsequently, he underwent radical left nephrectomy in that same month. Pathology of the resected tumor was ccRCC, Fuhrman Grade 2. In the following year, metastasis in the right adrenal gland was diagnosed and the patient was referred for a metastasectomy, which was performed in September 2003, when a 6.1 × 5.5 × 4.9 cm metastatic tumor was removed. Subsequently, he was enrolled in immunochemotherapy treatment.

Between September 2003 and January 2004, the patient received two courses of immunochemotherapy with a regimen of vinblastine, interleukin-2, and interferon alpha-2a (IFN-α-2a) in a single dosage of 4 mg intravenous vinblastine per m2 of body surface, 4.5 MU/m2 subcutaneous interleukin-2 q12h, qw1,3,5 and 3 MU/m2 subcutaneous interferon alpha-2a qd, qw 2,4,6 [27]. The immunochemotherapy was terminated due to stenocardial chest pain without myocardial ischemia signs. After metastasectomy and immunochemotherapy, the patient remained disease free until 2006 when multiple right lung and right femoral bone metastases were diagnosed at a routine check-up. In September 2006, bi-lobectomy of the right lung was performed, and in November 2006, the patient underwent a total right hip replacement. Total rib replacement with subsequent rehabilitation enabled the patient to walk without walking aid (cane, crutches or walker) until final deterioration (see below). All surgical specimens were confirmed as ccRCC.

In March 2007, new lung lesions were detected, and in April 2007 the patient was started on immunotherapy of 9 MU subcutaneous interferon alpha-2a qd, qw 1,3,5 with moderate tolerance of body temperature elevation up to 100.0°F, grade 3 neutropenia, myalgia, arthralgia and bone pain. The lung disease progressed after seven months from the beginning of the immunotherapy and he was transferred to sunitinib treatment beginning in November 2007 at a standard dose and schedule (50 mg, 4/2 weeks). After six cycles, the dose was reduced to 37.5 mg due to hand-foot syndrome and mucositis grade 3. The patient continued sunitinib treatment with the best response of stable disease (SD) and received a total of 15 cycles. Pamindronate disodium 90 mg administered monthly was prescribed in parallel due to bone lesions with concurrent hypercalcemia. In October 2009, the patient underwent a femoral bone intramedullary locking ChM nail placement in order to prevent pathologic fracture.

Due to further disease progression in the skeletal system, the patient was rescheduled on everolimus 10 mg/day. This treatment was continued with the best response of SD for the next 23 months (2009–2011), and was accompanied by zoledronic acid injections. As a result of a solitary new metastasis in the right kidney, the patient was referred for nephron-sparing surgery (NSS), which was performed in August 2010. In April 2011, multiple new skin metastases developed and the patient was referred for surgical consultation. In May 2011, scalp metastases were removed. After four weeks’ recovery in July 2011, the patient started sorafenib (2 × 200 mg b.i.d.) treatment. From 2011 to2012, sorafenib treatment was continued with SD for 7 cycles on standard dose. The patient tolerated the treatment well with reported neuropathies grade 2. Standard follow-up contrast-enhanced-CT scan was performed after 9 sorafenib cycles (March 2012). Metastases in the thoracic and abdominal lymph nodes, liver, right kidney, pancreas and skeleton were stable, but new lesions in the right lung (33 × 17 mm), in the right lumbar retroperitoneal region (27 × 20 mm), and in the psoas major muscle (10 mm) were described.

Moreover, contrast-enhancing tumors in the left myocardium (22 mm) and in the interventricular septum (26 mm) were described (Figure 1). This was defined as disease progression and the patient was transferred to pazopanib treatment in April 2012. In parallel, further laboratory tests and medical imaging were carried out (Table 2, Figure 2). In order to specify the diagnosis, we referred the patient for an echocardiogram that confirmed a 16 × 19 mm tumor localized between the inferoseptal and apical septal segments with an estimated ejection fraction (EF) of 60%.A subsequent cardiac MRI performed in April 2012 revealed multiple intramyocardial metastases (Figure 2), including tumors localized in segments: 1) apical inferior and apical lateral (13 × 7 mm); 2) apical septal and mid-inferoseptal (3 tumors: 10 mm, 11 mm, and 14 mm); 3) basal anterior (13 mm); 4) basal anteroseptal (18 mm); 5) mid-anteroseptal with pericardium infiltration (44 × 31 × 26 mm); and also in 6) anterior (14 mm) and posterior papillary (13 mm) muscles of the left ventricle (LV). On cardiac MRI, the EF was measured at 49.6% and hypokinetic muscles were described in the septum and anterolateral mid-ventricular segment. Cardiac single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) confirmed impaired myocardial perfusion in the inferolateral wall of the LV and anterior apex. Although the patient developed no signs or symptoms of cardiac dysrhythmia, a 24-hr Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) was performed and revealed ST-segment elevation, atrial extrasystoles, premature ventricular complexes, and a single episode of atrial fibrillation.After five months of standard pazopanib treatment, a cardiac MRI in July 2012 (Figure 2) revealed SD with massive necrosis in the tumor localized in septal segments and an EF of 45%. At this point, the 24-h Holter ECG revealed no rhythm abnormalities. Due to massive necrosis – a typical TKI treatment effect – the patient was referred for IFN-alpha treatment and received IFN-α-2a 3 million U, three times weekly for two months. This treatment was terminated due to poor tolerance with significant myalgia, arthralgia, and severe bone pain. In August 2012, a follow-up CT revealed progression according to RECIST-1.1 criteria with new lung and peritoneal tumors. In November 2012, axitinib treatment in a reduced dose (5 mg) was initiated. After two cycles of treatment, the patient’s condition deteriorated and the patient passed in March 2013. OS since ccRCC diagnosis was 11 years 2 months, since first TKI treatment was 5 years 3 months, and since diagnosis of multiple heart metastases was 1 year.
Figure 1

First CTimaging showing intramyocardial tumor in the LV in the left myocardium (white arrow 1A and 1B) and in the interventricular septum (red arrow 1A and 1B).

Figure 2

Cardiac-MRI performed on treatment onset and follow-up showing multiple (2A, 2B, and 2C) intramyocardial tumors and large necrosis on TKI treatment - coronal, horizontal and sagittal sections.

Conclusions

Metastatic ccRCC involving the heart is well-recognized but a rare phenomenon, mostly arising as an intravascular protruding tumor. According to literature since 2000, right atrial in-growth of RCC was recently diagnosed in no more than 1% of cases at the time of nephrectomy. In post-mortem studies, cardiac metastasis was shown to be present in 11% of patients who died of RCC [3].

There are two mechanisms of cardiac involvement. Tumor extension through the renal vein and IVC is the main mechanism for the spread of cardiac ccRCC. On the other hand, metastases may also arise by diffuse systemic blood-borne spread or through the intrathoracic lymphatic system, especially in the presence of disseminated disease and pulmonary metastases [3]. It is clear that left ventricular metastases from ccRCC without vena caval or right atrial involvement are casuistic (Table 1). In the absence of either direct vena caval extension or systemic disease, involvement of the heart is extremely rare with only two cases known [12]. This specific pattern of metastasis should be considered a Stage 4 disease, with an expected five-year survival of less than 10% [20]. Up until now, only 21 cases of intramyocardial tumors of ccRCC have been described in the literature (Table 1). Majority of these cases were single tumors. Only reports by two groups have shown multiple cardiac metastases from ccRCC [3, 13]. Moreover only in two cases, the patients were treated with TKI, but in both cases, cardiac tumors were single, and no cardiac tests were reported nor was functional testing evaluation performed. In one of the cases the tumor actually developed on sorafenib treatment [14]. Other disease course and treatment is required if is a tumor thrombus that protrude to the heart, but not develop as intramyocarial metastases. In particular it was shown that tumor thrombus level does not predict recurrence or mortality in this group of ccRCC patients who present with IVC involvement in the renal vein (Group 1) or subdiaphragmatic IVC tumor thrombus (Group 2), in comparison to involvement of IVC above diaphragm or atrial extension (Group 3). Survival is determined by inherent aggressiveness of the cancer manifested by tumor size, grade and distant metastasis at presentation [28]. Pre-surgical treatment with sunitinib is able to ease surgery for ccRCC tumor thrombi and surgery after sunitinib treatment may be possible without additional morbidity. In this setting, two courses of pre-surgical therapy with sunitinib may be appropriate treatment [29].

Most ccRCC cardiac metastases remain asymptomatic, as in the case of this patient at the time of diagnosis. The most common cardiac presentation of renal cell carcinoma is hypertension, but other cardiac presentations include shortness of breath, cough, arrhythmias, chest pain, important hemodynamic impairment, and peripheral edema [21]. Tachyarrhythmia is also found often in this patients and may lead to syncope [21]. Coronary occlusion or compression from tumor masses can lead to myocardial infarction, heart failure, and death [12]. A typical clinical pattern of cardiac ccRCC disease progression is characterized by a worsening performance status, exacerbation of cardiac symptoms, including tamponade, arrhythmia, obstruction, or dilated cardiomyopathy, representing one of the terminal events as in the case of the reported patient [30]. Coronary occlusion or compression from tumor masses may also lead to myocardial infarction and death [12]. Pericardial involvement with effusion and cardiac tamponade is the most commonly recognized cause of hemodynamic compromise [24].

A variety of diagnostic imaging and hemodynamic techniques have been applied in the diagnostic process of all cases published, including echocardiography, CT, MRI, and even right heart catheterization and right ventriculography [24]. In our opinion cardiac MRI could be the diagnostic tool of choice in the assessment of patients with RCC when cardiac metastasis is suspected (Figure 2). Although there is overlap of the MRI characteristics of several cardiac masses, MRI is reliable tool to exclude lipomas, fibromas, and hemangiomas as well as thrombus or lipomatous hypertrophy. Also necrosis, extra-cardiac spread, and pericardial effusion may be identified with cardiac MRI [31]. Transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, and PET-CT may also be used to diagnose cardiac metastases [20, 30]. The capability of PET for absolute quantification in general and for blood flow quantification in particular is a substantial advantage. As we have shown in this case with SPECT, cardiac lesions visualized by functional imaging are correlated with anatomic data and provides sensitivity as well as the specificity of scintigraphic findings. Myocardium perfusion and coronary morphology can be evaluated with SPECT/CT systems. For assessing absolute flow and coronary flow reserve imaging with SPECT also appears to be reliable [32]. Targeted systemic therapy may be useful for this group of patients [11], but profound necrosis in the heart wall may evoke tamponade, therefore follow-up cardiac MRI scans are required. Resection or embolization of ccRCC cardiac metastasis is dependent on the location and relationship of the tumor to the important local structures [11, 19]. Finally, based on experience with this patient and literature data, we propose regular cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation in ccRCC patients receiving TKI treatment when intramyocardial ccRCC metastases are found. We believe that MRI combines noninvasive multiplanar imaging and the ability to acquire functional information with excellent contrast resolution [31].

Finally this case presents prolonged treatment with multiple lines of TKIs and mTOR inhibitor after immunotherapy. At this point of time third line therapy - following first-line TKI and mTOR inhibitors remains undefined, although sunitinib and other VEGF inhibitors have demonstrated activity in this setting [33]. Re-challenge with TKIs may provide clinical benefit in terms of PSF/OS after everolimus in patients with mRCC [34], as in this case. Recent data analysis has proven that globally PFS durations is shorter and response rate lower on re-challenge following initial treatment, but longer interval between treatments was shown to increase response to sunitinib re-challenge [35]. In a wide retrospective analysis in the sorafenib – mTOR inhibitor – sunitinib group subsequent PFS was of 11.7, 5.1 and 9.1 months, respectively, while in the sunitinib – mTOR inhibitor – sorafenib group PFS was 14.4, 4.3, and 3.9 months, respectively. This has led to conclusion that there is no significant difference between the two sequence modalities [36]. After failure of everolimus, re-exposure to TKIs was recently reported as a common clinical practice. It was demonstrates that patients obtain clinical benefit of therapies beyond immunotherapy – sunitinib/sorafenib – everolimus sequence. Drugs administered beyond was sunitinib (in 28.6% cases), sorafenib (in 28.6%) and other therapies (in 42.8%) in a recent report [37]. It was also shown that sunitinib and sorafenib re-challenge may be considered as it has had potential benefits in terms of PFS and may be tolerated in select mRCC patients [38, 39]. This treatment modality may be effective due to a transient nature of sunitinib resistance [40, 41] and in primarily sunitinib-responsive patients, re-challenge with sunitinib may be successfully introduced after mTOR inhibitor - refractory disease [42]. This case also confirms that sequential therapy enables to obtain prolong combined PSF as result of multiple lines of treatment. Although this patient obtained benefit from presented sequence immunotherapy – sunitinib – everolimus – sorafenib – pazopanib – axitinib, but for further cases ‘ideal sequence’ is still unknown. It should be hoped that TKIs, mTORIs with novel therapies (anti-PDL1, anti-PD1 anti-CTLA4) used in combination or sequentially have potential to provide best treatment and favorable outcomes in ccRCC. Results from ongoing and planned trials are expected to help shape future therapy [43].

Consent

The patient gave consent for all treatment procedures used and future scientific publications. Informed consent for this publication was obtained from relative of the patient. The patient passed prior to manuscript preparation.

Authors’ information

CS is a clinical oncology specialist since 1986, and has worked at Temple University School of Medicine, Jefferson Cancer Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, and in the last 10 years has participated in major renal cancer treatment clinical trials including AXIS, EU-ARCCS or TARGET and is an expert in renal cancer treatment; AMC specializes in clinical oncology and biotechnology, and has trained at the Universite degli Studi di Palermo, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, and Emory University School of Medicine.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Jerzy Czarnecki for fruitful discussions and manuscript proofreading. This work was supported by statutory funding from the Military Institute of Medicine. Proofreading services (Scribendi Inc.) fee was covered by CS.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Oncology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
(2)
The Second Faculty of Medicine with the English Division and the Physiotherapy Division, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
(3)
Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA
(4)
Department of Oncology, Military Institute of Medicine, Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Warsaw, Poland

References

  1. Roigas J, Schroeder J, Rudolph B, Schnorr D: Renal cell cancer with a symptomatic heart metastasis. BJU Int. 2002, 90 (6): 622-623. 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.02872.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradley SM, Bolling SF: Late renal cell carcinoma metastasis to the left ventricular outflow tract. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995, 60 (1): 204-206. 10.1016/S0003-4975(94)01064-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Zustovich F, Gottardo F, De Zorzi L, Cecchetto A, Dal Bianco M, Mauro E, Cartei G: Cardiac metastasis from renal cell carcinoma without inferior vena involvement: a review of the literature based on a case report: two different patterns of spread?. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008, 13 (3): 271-274. 10.1007/s10147-007-0730-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Pinnamaneni N, Muthukrishnan A: Left ventricular myocardium metastasis in a patient with primary renal cell carcinoma detected by 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2012, 37 (7): e181-183. 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31824c5def.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dominik J, Moravek P, Zacek P, Vojacek J, Brtko M, Podhola M, Pacovsky J, Harrer J: Long-term survival after radical surgery for renal cell carcinoma with tumour thrombus extension into the right atrium. BJU Int. 2013, 111 (3 Pt B): E59-64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Schneider M, Hadaschik B, Hallscheidt P, Jakobi H, Fritz M, Motsch J, Pahernik S, Hohenfellner M: Manual repositioning of intra-atrial kidney cancer tumor thrombus: a technique reducing the need for cardiopulmonary bypass. Urology. 2013, 81 (4): 909-914. 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.064.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, Michaelson MD, Bukowski RM, Rixe O, Oudard S, Negrier S, Szczylik C, Kim ST, Chen I, Bycott PW, Baum CM, Figlin RA: Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2007, 356 (2): 115-124. 10.1056/NEJMoa065044.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Escudier B, Eisen T, Stadler WM, Szczylik C, Oudard S, Siebels M, Negrier S, Chevreau C, Solska E, Desai AA, Rolland F, Demkow T, Hutson TE, Gore M, Freeman S, Schwartz B, Shan M: Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2007, 356 (2): 125-134. 10.1056/NEJMoa060655.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rini BI, Escudier B, Tomczak P, Kaprin A, Szczylik C, Hutson TE, Michaelson MD, Gorbunova VA, Gore ME, Rusakov IG, Negrier S, Ou YC, Castellano D, Lim HY, Uemura H, Tarazi J: Comparative effectiveness of axitinib versus sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (AXIS): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2011, 378 (9807): 1931-1939. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61613-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sternberg CN, Davis ID, Mardiak J, Szczylik C, Lee E, Wagstaff J, Barrios CH, Salman P, Gladkov OA, Kavina A, Zarba JJ, Chen M, McCann L, Pandite L, Roychowdhury DF, Hawkins RE: Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011, 28 (6): 1061-1068.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Talukder MQ, Deo SV, Maleszewski JJ, Park SJ: Late isolated metastasis of renal cell carcinoma in the left ventricular myocardium. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010, 11 (6): 814-816. 10.1510/icvts.2010.246223.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Aburto J, Bruckner BA, Blackmon SH, Beyer EA, Reardon MJ: Renal cell carcinoma, metastatic to the left ventricle. Tex Heart Inst J. 2009, 36 (1): 48-49.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Rohani M, Roumina S, Saha SK: Renal adenocarcinoma with intramyopericardial and right atrial metastasis, latter via coronary sinus: report of a case. Echocardiography. 2005, 22 (4): 345-348. 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2005.04068.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tokuyama Y, Iwamura M, Fujita T, Sugita A, Maeyama R, Bessho H, Ishikawa W, Tabata K, Yoshida K, Baba S: Myocardial metastasis from renal cell carcinoma treated with sorafenib. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2011, 57 (10): 555-558.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Safi AM, Rachko M, Sadeghinia S, Zineldin A, Dong J, Stein RA: Left ventricular intracavitary mass and pericarditis secondary to metastatic renal cell carcinoma–a case report. Angiology. 2003, 54 (4): 495-498. 10.1177/000331970305400416.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ishida N, Takemura H, Shimabukuro K, Matsuno Y: Complete resection of asymptomatic solitary right atrial metastasis from renal cell carcinoma without inferior vena cava involvement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011, 142 (3): e142-144. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.04.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Minale C, Ulbricht LJ, Holer H, Kobberling J, Cramer BM, Schubert GE: A rare form of heart metastasis: hypernephroma: successful surgical treatment. Z Kardiol. 1995, 84 (8): 643-647.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tatenuma T, Yao M, Sakata R, Sano F, Makiyama K, Nakaigawa N, Nakayama T, Inayama Y, Kubota Y: A case of myocardiac metastasis of clear cell renal carcinoma successfully treated with sunitinib. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2013, 59 (2): 97-101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Butz T, Schmidt HK, Fassbender D, Esdorn H, Wiemer M, Horstkotte D, Faber L: Echo-guided percutaneous coil embolization of a symptomatic massive metastasis of a renal cell carcinoma in the right ventricular outflow tract. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008, 9 (5): 725-727. 10.1093/ejechocard/jen153.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Otahbachi M, Cevik C, Sutthiwan P: Right ventricle and tricuspid valve metastasis in a patient with renal cell carcinoma. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2009, 9 (4): E11-12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Alghamdi A, Tam J: Cardiac metastasis from a renal cell carcinoma. Can J Cardiol. 2006, 22 (14): 1231-1232. 10.1016/S0828-282X(06)70964-3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Masaki M, Kuroda T, Hosen N, Hirota H, Terai K, Oshima Y, Nakaoka Y, Sugiyama S, Kimura R, Yoshihara S, Kawakami M, Iizuka N, Tomita Y, Ogawa H, Kawase I, Yamauchi-Takihara K: Solitary right ventricle metastasis by renal cell carcinoma. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004, 17 (4): 397-398. 10.1016/j.echo.2003.12.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cheng AS: Cardiac metastasis from a renal cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Pract. 2003, 57 (5): 437-438.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Labib SB, Schick EC, Isner JM: Obstruction of right ventricular outflow tract caused by intracavitary metastatic disease: analysis of 14 cases. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992, 19 (7): 1664-1668. 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90634-Y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Carroll JC, Quinn CC, Weitzel J, Sant GR: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma to the right cardiac ventricle without contiguous vena caval involvement. J Urol. 1994, 151 (1): 133-134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang B, Malouf J, Young P, Kohli M, Dronca R: Cardiac metastasis in renal cell carcinoma without vena cava or atrial involvement: an unusual presentation of metastatic disease. Rare Tumors. 2013, 5 (3): e29-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Pectasides D, Varthalitis J, Kostopoulou M, Mylonakis A, Triantaphyllis D, Papadopoulou M, Dimitriadis M, Athanassiou A: An outpatient phase II study of subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha-2b in combination with intravenous vinblastine in metastatic renal cell cancer. Oncology. 1998, 55 (1): 10-15. 10.1159/000011829.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sidana A, Goyal J, Aggarwal P, Verma P, Rodriguez R: Determinants of outcomes after resection of renal cell carcinoma with venous involvement. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012, 44 (6): 1671-1679. 10.1007/s11255-012-0314-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Horn T, Thalgott MK, Maurer T, Hauner K, Schulz S, Fingerle A, Retz M, Gschwend JE, Kubler HR: Presurgical treatment with sunitinib for renal cell carcinoma with a level III/IV vena cava tumour thrombus. Anticancer Res. 2012, 32 (5): 1729-1735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Garcia JR, Simo M, Huguet M, Ysamat M, Lomena F: Usefulness of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of tumor cardiac thrombus from renal cell carcinoma. Clin Transl Oncol. 2006, 8 (2): 124-128. 10.1007/s12094-006-0169-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ward TJ, Kadoch MA, Jacobi AH, Lopez PP, Salvo JS, Cham MD: Magnetic resonance imaging of benign cardiac masses: a pictorial essay. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2013, 3: 34-10.4103/2156-7514.117458.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Buck AK, Nekolla S, Ziegler S, Beer A, Krause BJ, Herrmann K, Scheidhauer K, Wester HJ, Rummeny EJ, Schwaiger M, Drzezga A: Spect/Ct. J Nucl Med. 2008, 49 (8): 1305-1319. 10.2967/jnumed.107.050195.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Escudier B, Albiges L, Sonpavde G: Optimal management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: current status. Drugs. 2013, 73 (5): 427-438. 10.1007/s40265-013-0043-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Paule B, Brion N: Sunitinib re-challenge in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated sequentially with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and everolimus. Anticancer Res. 2011, 31 (10): 3507-3510.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Porta C, Paglino C, Grunwald V: Sunitinib re-challenge in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2014,http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/bjc2014214a.html,Google Scholar
  36. Paglino C, Procopio G, Sabbatini R, Bellmunt J, Schmidinger M, Bearz A, Bamias A, Melichar B, Imarisio I, Tinelli C, Porta C: A retrospective analysis of two different sequences of therapy lines for advanced kidney cancer. Anticancer Res. 2013, 33 (11): 4999-5004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Maute L, Grunwald V, Weikert S, Kube U, Gauler T, Kahl C, Burkholder I, Bergmann L: Therapy of mRCC beyond mTOR-inhibition in clinical practice: results of a retrospective analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014, 140 (5): 823-827. 10.1007/s00432-014-1610-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Zama IN, Hutson TE, Elson P, Cleary JM, Choueiri TK, Heng DY, Ramaiya N, Michaelson MD, Garcia JA, Knox JJ, Escudier B, Rini BI: Sunitinib rechallenge in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. Cancer. 2010, 116 (23): 5400-5406. 10.1002/cncr.25583.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nozawa M, Yamamoto Y, Minami T, Shimizu N, Hatanaka Y, Tsuji H, Uemura H: Sorafenib rechallenge in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2012, 110 (6 Pt B): E228-234.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Buczek M, Escudier B, Bartnik E, Szczylik C, Czarnecka A: Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: from the patient’s bed to molecular mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014, 1845 (1): 31-41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Bielecka ZF, Czarnecka AM, Solarek W, Kornakiewicz A, Szczylik C: Mechanisms of acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in clear -cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Curr Signal Transduct Ther. 2013, 8: 219-228.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Grunwald V, Weikert S, Seidel C, Busch J, Johannsen A, Fenner M, Reuter C, Ganser A, Johannsen M: Efficacy of sunitinib re-exposure after failure of an mTOR inhibitor in patients with metastatic RCC. Onkologie. 2011, 34 (6): 310-314. 10.1159/000328575.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Porta C, Szczylik C, Escudier B: Combination or sequencing strategies to improve the outcome of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: a critical review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012, 82 (3): 323-337. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.06.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2490/14/73/prepub

Copyright

© Czarnecka et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement