Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Targeted salvage lymphadenectomy in patients treated with radical prostatectomy with biochemical recurrence: complete biochemical response without adjuvant therapy in patients with low volume lymph node recurrence over a long-term follow-up

  • Alexander Winter1Email author,
  • Rolf-Peter Henke2 and
  • Friedhelm Wawroschek1
BMC Urology201515:10

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0004-y

Received: 12 May 2014

Accepted: 5 February 2015

Published: 21 February 2015

Abstract

Background

Choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) represents an option in restaging of prostate cancer patients with disease relapse after local treatment. The present study assess whether salvage resection of lymph node metastases detected on choline PET/CT imaging in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy can result in a long-term complete biochemical remission, without adjuvant therapy.

Methods

We analysed 13 patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA) recurrence (PSA median 1.64 ng/ml, range 0.5-9.55) after radical prostatectomy and suspicious lymph nodes (median 1; range 1–3) detected on [11C]choline and [18F]fluoroethylcholine PET/CT scans. An open salvage lymphadenectomy of positive lymph nodes in a PET/CT scan and nearby lymph nodes was carried out. We examined PSA outcome without adjuvant therapy; defined complete biochemical remission as PSA <0.01 ng/ml. Histological and PET/CT findings were compared.

Results

Ten of 11 patients with histologically confirmed lymph node metastases showed a PSA response. Three of ten patients with single lymph node metastases had a complete biochemical remission (median follow-up 72 months, range 31.0-83). In five cases with single lymph node metastasis PSA decreased <0.02 ng/ml. Histologically confirmed 13 of 16 metastasis suspicious lymph nodes. No lymph node metastases were detected in two patients. All of the additionally removed 30 lymph nodes were correctly negative.

Conclusions

This is the first confirmation of a complete biochemical remission after PET/CT guided secondary resection of a single lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy, over the long-term (>6.5 years), without adjuvant therapy. In order to improve these promising results, longer-term studies with more patients are required.

Keywords

Prostate cancer Choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography Biochemical recurrence Salvage lymphadenectomy Lymph node metastases

Background

Biochemical recurrence following surgical treatment of prostate cancer is a common event. The introduction of new functional imaging developments have improved the detection of the site of small volume lymph node (LN) recurrence in prostate cancer patients. This raises now the question if there is a role for secondary targeted surgery of small volume LN recurrences. In recent years, different research groups have published data on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) guided salvage LN dissection in patients with biochemical recurrence and nodal recurrence after a radical prostatectomy [1-3]. Based on this data situation, salvage lymphadenectomy is seen as a possible option for patients with disease relapse limited to the LNs after radical prostatectomy [4]. Integrated [11C]choline or [18F]fluoroethylcholine PET/CT scans, despite their limitations [5], have exhibited good sensitivity and specificity for detecting small (>5 mm) LN metastases after radical prostatectomy. In patients with biochemical failure after local treatment with curative intent, actual meta-analysis results showed pooled sensitivity, specificity, and a diagnostic odds ratio of 85%, 88%, and 41.4 respectively, on a per-patient basis [6]. In contrast, CT and conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are not definitive for early detection of LNs recurrence. Lymphotropic nanoparticle enhanced MRI can detect smaller LN metastases (>2 mm) but has not been approved for routine diagnostics [7].

Long-term follow-up studies have shown relapse-free survival after radical prostatectomy in patients with minimal lymphatic dissemination, even without adjuvant therapy [8,9]. These data suggest that resection of LN metastases in selected patients in a secondary situation is also beneficial. However, most prior studies dealing with salvage LN dissection provide no evidence on long-term complete PSA response without adjuvant therapy. These patients were either treated after the secondary resection of LN metastases with hormones or radiation therapy [1,10] or were monitored without adjuvant therapy, mostly over a short period [11]. Moreover, these studies and Rigatti et al. [2] defined the biochemical response to treatment only as prostate specific antigen (PSA) <0.2 ng/ml.

Our group has already published promising initial results of patients with relapse-free survival after secondary LN surgery without adjuvant therapy [3]. The aim of the present study with more patients and a longer follow-up is to evaluate whether solely secondary resection of LN metastases in patients with biochemical recurrence or PSA persistence after radical prostatectomy can result in a complete long-term biochemical remission (PSA <0.01 ng/ml). The PSA outcome after targeted resection of LN metastases detected on choline PET/CT scans was analysed over the long-term in patients with biochemical recurrence or persistence after radical prostatectomy, without adjuvant therapy after salvage lymphadenectomy.

Methods

Patient population

This study included 13 patients with PSA recurrence or persistence after radical prostatectomy, performed within the previous three months to 10 years. A retropubic radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed on 12 patients and a radical retropubic prostatectomy only on one patient. In our clinic, one patient underwent a sentinel guided LN dissection on both sides of the pelvic and an extended LN dissection on the right side, because of an advanced tumour; another one underwent only a sentinel guided LN dissection. The remaining patients had undergone conventional LN dissections carried out at other institutions and in one case at our clinic. All patients had LN pathological uptake on [11C]choline or [18F]fluoroethylcholine PET/CT scans and no signs of any local recurrence or distant metastasis. Furthermore, none of the patients showed any signs of ossary metastases in the skeletal scintigraphy.

Integrated choline PET/CT imaging

All [11C]choline or [18F]fluoroethylcholine PET/CT studies were performed in four external centres by experts using integrated PET/CT systems. Experienced radiologists and nuclear medicine specialists evaluated the images to anatomically localise the sites of pathological choline uptake. The diagnosis of tumour positive LNs on PET/CT images was based on visual evidence of the presence of focal increased uptake on a choline PET scan, where the location corresponded to LNs on CT images (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Integrated [18F]fluoroethylcholine PET/CT scan. Integrated [18F]fluoroethylcholine PET/CT scan shows a single lymph node metastasis in the left iliac region (arrow). The lymph node metastasis was confirmed histopathologically after secondary lymph node surgery. (Source: Clinic for Nuclear Medicine, Pius Hospital Oldenburg, Germany).

Surgical procedure, PSA evaluation, histological evaluation

Two highly experienced surgeons performed open secondary LN dissections at one centre on patients in the study, between September 2004 and February 2013. They dissected pathological LNs detected on choline PET/CT scans and nearby LNs. Clavien-Dindo grading system was used to classify complications. The PSA development was monitored postoperatively without adjuvant therapy.

Androgen ablation was not continued in those patients who did have androgen ablation before the salvage surgery. Patients with PSA persistence or further PSA increase after the secondary LN surgery have been treated with hormone withdrawal in the further course and have been followed up in the study anymore. The primary histological diagnosis was made on haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections. Immunohistochemical staining of cytokeratins was performed to verify micrometastases. In one case, additional antibodies against PSA, prostate-specific acid phosphatase, p504s, and the proliferation marker Ki67 were employed for typing the metastatic tissue. The histological findings were compared with the PET/CT findings.

Since only adjacent LNs were removed in addition to the PET/CT positive LNs and furthermore, no extended lymphadenectomy was performed, it was not possible to calculate the sensitivity of the PET/CT diagnostics for detecting metastases. Specificity was calculated according to its definition (true-negatives/true-negatives + false-positives).

Ethical approval

This study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards and the German legislation. The current analysis represents a retrospective evaluation of a consecutive data bank, which was done by a separate unit. The data have already been made anonymous at the source. Therefore this retrospective analysis does not require formal ethical approval.

Results

A summary of patient characteristics is shown in Table 1. In 11 of 13 patients, metastasis-suspicious LNs detected by means of PET/CT images could be completely removed. These were also histologically positive. In one patient with two metastasis-suspicious LNs detected on PET/CT scans, only one histologically-negative LN could be resected, because of severe cicatrisation. A further 30 (mean 2.3, range 0 – 10) adjacent PET/CT negative LNs were dissected and found negative for cancer. In one case, the neighbouring LNs could not be removed, because just three months earlier this patient had undergone an sentinel guided and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy on the same affected side. In another patient, only cicatricial tissue could be removed in addition to one LN metastasis after radiotherapy. In the same patient, a small lesion of the ureter necessitated secondary ureteral stenting (Clavien-Dindo IIIb). In all other cases, the intra- and postoperative courses were without complications.
Table 1

Summary of patient characteristics and PSA outcome after secondary resection of lymph node metastases without adjuvant therapy

Patient

Age (yr)

Primary treatment

Initial tumour stage

Gleason score

Hormonal therapy after primary treatment

Radio-therapy after primary treatment

PSA initial (ng/ml)

PSA1 (ng/ml)

[11C] choline PET/CT

[18F]fluoro-ethylcholine PET/CT

PET/CT positive LN

PSA2 (ng/ml)

Follow-up (month)

1

61

RRP + PLND

pT3a pN0 M0 R0

3 + 4

-

-

4.13

0.92

+

-

1

0.22

79

2

59

RRP + PLND

pT2c pN0 M0 R0

4 + 3

+

-

26.7

4.09

+

-

1

<0.01

83

3

64

RRP + PLND

pT3a pN1 M0 R0

4 + 3

-

-

16.0

2.45

+

-

1

<0.01

72

4

68

RRP

pT3a pNx M0 R0

-

-

+

9.9

1.64

-

+

1

<0.01

37

5

78

RRP + PLND

pT3b pN0 M0 R0

3 + 4

-

-

3.2

1.62

+

-

1

2.7

27

6

59

RRP + PLND

pT3a pN0 M0 R0

4 + 3

+

-

7.6

4.51

+

-

1

1.5

6

7

49

RRP + PLND

pT3b pN0 M0 R0

4 + 5

-

-

4.0

0.67

+

-

1

0.03

5

8

61

RRP + PLND

pT3a pN0 M0 R0

5 + 5

+

+

NA

9.55

+

-

3

54.46

12

9

53

RRP + PLND

pT3a pN0 M0 R1

4 + 4

-

+

36.0

3.54

-

+

1

0.4

7

10

75

RRP + PLND

pT3a pN0 M0 R1

4 + 3

-

+

5.94

3.77

+

-

1

10.3

2

11

75

RRP + PLND

pT3a pN0 M0 R0

3 + 3

-

+

7.14

0.94

-

+

1

0.01

10

12

55

RRP + PLND

pT3b pN1 M0 R0

4 + 3

-

-

5.08

0.5

+

-

2

no histologically confirmed LNM

13

64

RRP + PLND

pT3a pN0 M0 R1

-

-

+

8.21

1.23

+

-

1

no histologically confirmed LNM

Median

61

      

1.64

  

1

 

RRP =  radical retropubic prostatectomy; PLND = pelvic lymph node dissection; PSA initial = PSA at primary diagnosis; PSA1 = PSA at time of PET/CT diagnosis; PSA2 = PSA after resection of lymph node metastases; LNM = lymph node metastases. NA = not available.

After the secondary LNs resection, ten of 11 patients with histologically-confirmed LN metastases showed a PSA response, without adjuvant therapy after secondary LN surgery. In five of ten patients with single LN metastases the PSA value decreased <0.2 ng/ml. Three patients with single metastases had a lasting complete PSA remission (<0.01 ng/ml). The maximum follow-up duration for these patients was 83 months (median 72 month, range 31.0 – 83). In one of the four cases with a single LN metastases and only a partial, incomplete remission local recurrence was detected in the course of the study by means of PET/CT and MRI. In the three other patients with incomplete remission, a tumorous infiltration of the adjacent tissue had already been detected histologically. In the patient without PSA response, three LN metastases were histologically confirmed. Table 1 shows the PSA outcome for all patients.

Discussion

The introduction of new functional imaging techniques improved detection of LN metastases in prostate cancer and opens new focal treatment options. For example studies with magnetic resonance lymphography guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy have shown to eliminate metastatic lymph nodes [12]. The role of secondary LN surgery in prostate cancer is still being debated. In recent years, an increasing number of publications have released data on secondary LN dissections in patients treated with radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy. However, the studies did not analyse the course of PSA or a complete remission after secondary resection of LNs metastases for longer than five years, without adjuvant therapy. Moreover, these studies defined a relapse-free condition as a PSA of only 0.2 ng/ml (Table 2). Ours is the first study that has been able to confirm complete PSA remission (<0.01 ng/ml) lasting over almost seven years, following secondary LN surgery of a patient with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy, without adjuvant therapy. The median follow-up period was 72 months for three relapse-free patients, all of whom exhibited minimal lymphatic dissemination or a single LN metastasis.
Table 2

Biochemical response in prostate cancer patients after PET/CT guided salvage lymph node surgery

Literature

Year

Patients or LN dissections

Patients or LN dissections with positive histology

Positive nodes (mean)

PSA at time of PET/CT diagnosis (mean, ng/ml)

Biochemical response (%)

Complete biochemical response without adjuvant therapy in patients with histologically confirmed LN metastases

PSA <0.2 ng/ml

follow-up (month, mean)

PSA <0.01 ng/ml

follow-up (month, mean)

Scattoni et al. [1]

2007

25

19 (76%)

8.8

1.98

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Rigatti et al. [2]

2011

72

60 (83%)

9.8

3.7

57

4 of 28 patients

38.9

NA

NA

Jilg et al. [10]

2012

52

47 (90%)

9.7

3.9

46

NA

NA

NA

NA

Martini et al. [13]

2012

8

6 (75%)

1.0

1.6

67

NA

NA

NA

NA

Winter et al.

 

13

11 (85%)

1.0

2.7

90

5 of 10 patients

41.4

3 of 10 patients

64 (max. 83)

LN dissections.

LN = lymph node, NA = not available.

The patients in the herein examined collective only show a comparatively low metastasis load, with an average of only one removed positive LN and an average PSA value of 2.7 ng/ml (Table 2). It is likely that the very good PSA response in our investigation also results from this. All patients with complete and thus far lasting remission were cases with only one LN metastasis. As shown previously by Rigatte et al. [2] and Jilg et al. [10], presurgical PSA levels and the number of removed positive LNs are independent predictors for clinical progression after secondary removal of the LNMs. Patients with low PSA levels (<4 ng/ml), well to moderately differentiated tumours (Gleason score ≤7); minimal or LN relapse limited to the pelvis only appear to be the best suited candidates for salvage LN dissection [4]. These factors also apply to the three patients with lasting complete PSA remission in our study.

Observations in the primary situation support a therapeutic benefit, especially for patients with minimal lymphatic dissemination, too. Several publications suggest that an extended pelvic lymphadenectomy increases the likelihood of finding positive nodes and improves biochemical relapse-free survival, particularly in patients with a maximum of two positive LNs [14-16].

One limitation of secondary LN surgery in prostate cancer patients is the constrained sensitivity of currently available imaging techniques, especially for detection of small LNs metastases. Contrary to conventional MRI and CT scans, PET ([11C]choline, [11F]choline) scans offer key benefits in detecting LN metastases, especially in case of restaging of patients with biochemical failure after local treatment with curative intent and prostate cancer foci of sizes up to 5 mm [6,17]. Nonetheless, the value of this method is limited because of the frequency of smaller metastases or micrometastases [18]. However, CT and MRI are far less reliable for detecting small metastases [19]. In future, diffusion-weighted MRI could provide additional information on tumour pathophysiology, in comparison with standardised uptake values (SUV) in choline PET/CT scans [20].

A debate is underway on whether choline PET/CT imaging offers the basis for early treatment decisions for patients with PSA failure after radical prostatectomy. Picchio et al. suggest that routine use of choline PET/CT scans cannot be recommended for PSA values <1 ng/ml [21]. However, patients with local recurrence after radical prostatectomy are best treated by salvage radiotherapy when the PSA serum level is <0.5 ng/ml. Our study detected positive findings with a very low PSA value (0.67 ng/ml). Also, Scattoni et al. [1] and others [22] have shown positive results in patients with very low PSA levels (<1 ng/ml). A study by Castellucci et al. detected recurrent disease in 28% of patients with PSA <1.5 ng/ml detected by PET/CT [23]. Distant unexpected metastases were detected by PET/CT scans in 21% of the patients, whereby unnecessary local radiotherapy could be avoided. Mamede et al. [24] evaluate the role of [11]C-choline PET/CT imaging only in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy, showing PSA values below 0.5 ng/ml. The choline PET/CT scan was true positive in 15 of 71 (21.1%) cases. In seven of the 71 patients (9.9%), a choline uptake was observed in pelvic LNs. Nevertheless, it is evident that the positive detection rate of choline PET/CT scans depends on the PSA level and PSA kinetics. PSA and PSA doubling time are independent predictors of positive PET/CT findings. Accordingly, Giovacinni et al. observed a significant rise in positive findings, based on the PSA level (PSA 0.2 – 1 ng/ml: 19%; 1 – 3 ng/ml: 46%; >3 ng/ml: 82%) and the PSA doubling time (>6 months: 27%; 3 – 6 months: 61%; <3 months: 81%) [25]. Besides, another principal limitation of the method is the inhibitory effect of androgen deprivation therapy on choline uptake in patients with hormone sensitive prostate cancer [26]. A [68Ga] PSMA PET/CT scan appears to offer clear advantages over a choline PET/CT scan, particularly for small LN metastases. Compared to a choline PET/CT scan, a [68Ga] PSMA PET/CT scan shows LN metastases with significantly higher contrast, especially at low PSA levels [27].

Our study shows full correlation between [11C]choline PET/CT and [18F]fluoroethylcholine PET/CT images and histological findings in ten of eleven patients with a single LN metastasis (specificity 90.9%), and a specificity of 81.3% (13/16) across all patients. As far as the method is concerned, no conclusions can be drawn on the sensitivity of choline PET/CT imaging. On the contrary, Passoni et al. showed that [11C]choline PET/CT scans had a poor positive predictive value (24%) in identifying patients with single positive LNs at salvage LN dissections [28]. These patients also underwent a pelvic or pelvic and retroperitoneal LN dissection.

One limitation of the study is that no sufficient information on PSA kinetics (e.g. PSA doubling time) after radical prostatectomy was available for the included patients. However PSA doubling time coupled with the PSA parameter is an important predictor for positive PET/CT findings in a recurrence situation [25], which could not be taken into account accordingly in this analysis.

The small and heterogeneous sample size represent the main limitation of our study. Even among patients with a single LN metastasis (n= 10), only 30% of patients had a complete permanent remission (PSA <0.01 ng/ml) with undetectable PSA. However, in five (50%) of the patients with single LNs metastasis the PSA value decreased <0.2 ng/ml. Based on this data one cannot state with certainty whether patients with biochemical recurrence and minimal lymphatic dissemination after radical prostatectomy can be cured through surgery. Nonetheless, there is much to be said for this approach, considering one patient exhibited complete biochemical recurrence after secondary resection of a single LN metastases – for a period of over almost seven years by now. Hence, at least in such cases a therapeutic effect through secondary resection of LN metastases is likely. However, the results of studies with greater patient numbers and longer follow-up remain to be seen.

Conclusions

New functional imaging techniques have opened the door for new focal treatment options in prostate cancer recurrence. This is the first confirmation of a complete PSA remission (<0,01 ng/ml) after PET/CT guided secondary resection of single LNs metastases in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy, over the long-term (>6.5 years) and without adjuvant therapy after salvage lymphadenectomy. This approach at least offers a therapeutic benefit in selected cases with minimal lymphatic dissemination, possibly even a cure, through secondary dissection of LN metastases. Although choline PET/CT scans have their limitations, they are currently the most reliable and routinely available diagnostic tools for detecting LN metastases in prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. One can look forward to future improvements through the introduction of new tracers (e.g. 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand), especially for detecting small LN metastases at low PSA values. In order to improve this promising results, multicenter studies are required.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University Hospital for Urology, Klinikum Oldenburg, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg
(2)
Oldenburg Institute of Pathology

References

  1. Scattoni V, Picchio M, Suardi N, Messa C, Freschi M, Roscigno M, et al. Detection of LN metastases with integrated [11C]choline PET/CT in patients with PSA failure after radical retropubic prostatectomy: Results confirmed by open pelvic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;52:423–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Rigatti P, Suardi N, Briganti A, Da Pozzo LF, Tutolo M, Villa L, et al. Pelvic/retroperitoneal salvage LN dissection for patients treated with radical prostatectomy with biochemical recurrence and nodal recurrence detected by [11C]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Eur Urol. 2011;60:935–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Winter A, Uphoff J, Henke RP, Wawroschek F. First results of [11C]choline PET/CT-guided secondary LN surgery in patients with PSA failure and single LN recurrence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol Int. 2010;84:418–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Abdollah F, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Stenzl A, Stief C, Tombal B, et al. Contemporary role of salvage lymphadenectomy in patients with recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2014, doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.03.019, epub ahead of print.Google Scholar
  5. Osmonov DK, Heimann D, Janßen I, Aksenov A, Kalz A, Juenemann KP. Sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT regarding the detection of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer recurrence. Springerplus. 2014;3:340. doi:10.1186/2193-1801-3-340.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Umbehr MH, Müntener M, Hany T, Sulser T, Bachmann LM. The role of 11C-choline and 18 F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/CT in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2013;64:106–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Birkhäuser FD, Studer UE, Froehlich JM, Triantafyllou M, Bains LJ, Petralia G, et al. Combined ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging facilitates detection of metastases in normal-sized pelvic LNs of patients with bladder and prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2013;64:953–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Withrow DR, DeGroot JM, Siemens DR, Groome PA. Therapeutic value of LN dissection at radical prostatectomy: a population-based case-cohort study. BJU Int. 2011;08:209–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Von Bodman C, Godoy G, Chade DC, Cronin A, Tafe LJ, Fine SW, et al. Predicting biochemical recurrence-free survival for patients with positive pelvic LNs at radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2010;184:143–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Jilg CA, Rischke HC, Reske SN, Henne K, Grosu AL, Weber W, et al. Salvage LN dissection with adjuvant radiotherapy for nodal recurrence of prostate cancer. J Urol. 2012;188:2190–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rinnab L, Mottaghy FM, Blumstein NM, Reske SN, Hautmann RE, Hohl K, et al. Evaluation of [11C]-choline positron emission/computed tomography in patients with increasing prostate-specific antigen levels after primary treatment for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2007;100:786–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Meijer HJ, Debats OA, Kunze-Busch M, van Kollenburg P, Leer JW, Witjes JA, et al. Magnetic resonance lymphography-guided selective high-dose lymph node irradiation in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:175–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Martini T, Mayr R, Trenti E, Palermo S, Comploj E, Pycha A, et al. The role of C-choline PET/CT guided secondary lymphadenectomy in patients with PSA failure after radical prostatectomy: Lessons Learned from Eight Cases. Adv Uro 2012; doi:10.1155/2012/601572.Google Scholar
  14. Daneshmand S, Quek ML, Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cai J, Pinski J, et al. Prognosis of patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy: long-term results. J Urol. 2004;172:2252–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Briganti A, Karnes JR, Da Pozzo LF, Cozzarini C, Gallina A, Suardi N, et al. Two positive nodes represent a significant cut-off value for cancer specific survival in patients with node positive prostate cancer. A new proposal based on a two-institution experience on 703 consecutive N+ patients treated with radical prostatectomy, extended pelvic LN dissection and adjuvant therapy. Eur Urol. 2009;55:261–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Touijer KA, Mazzola CR, Sjoberg DD, Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Long-term Outcomes of patients with lymph node metastasis treated with radical prostatectomy without adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy. Eur Urol. 2014;65:20–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hara T, Kosaka N, Kishi H. Pet imaging of prostate cancer using carbon-11-choline. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:990–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Husarik DB, Miralbell R, Dubs M, John H, Giger OT, Gelet A, et al. Evaluation of [(18)f]-choline PET/CT for staging and restaging of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:253–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hövels AM, Heesakkers RA, Adang EM, Jager GJ, Strum S, Hoogeveen YL, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: A meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:387–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Beer AJ, Eiber M, Souvatzoglou M, Holzapfel K, Ganter C, Weirich G, et al. Restricted water diffusibility as measured by diffusion-weighted MR imaging and choline uptake in (11)C-choline PET/CT are correlated in pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2011;13:352–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Picchio M, Briganti A, Fanti S, Heidenreich A, Krause BJ, Messa C, et al. The role of choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the management of patients with prostate-specific antigen progression after radical treatment of prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2011;59:51–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Vees H, Buchegger F, Albrecht S, Khan H, Husarik D, Zaidi H, et al. 18 F-choline and/or 11C-acetate positron emission tomography: detection of residual or progressive subclinical disease at very low prostate-specific antigen values (<1 ng/ml) after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2007;99:1415–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Castellucci P, Fuccio C, Rubello D, Schiavina R, Santi I, Nanni C, et al. Is there a role for 11C-choline PET/CT in the early detection of metastatic disease in surgically treated prostate cancer patients with a mild PSA increase <1.5 ng/ml? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:55–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mamede M, Ceci F, Castellucci P, Schiavina R, Fuccio C, Nanni C, et al. The role of 11C-choline PET imaging in the early detection of recurrence in surgically treated prostate cancer patients with very low PSA level <0.5 ng/ml. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:342–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Giovacchini G, Picchio M, Scattoni V, Garcia Parra R, Briganti A, Gianolli L, et al. PSA doubling time for prediction of [(11)C]choline PET/CT findings in prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1106–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fuccio C, Schiavina R, Castellucci P, Rubello D, Martorana G, Celli M, et al. Androgen deprivation therapy influences the uptake of 11C-choline in patients with recurrent prostate cancer: the preliminary results of a sequential PET/CT study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1985–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Afshar-Oromieh A, Zechmann CM, Malcher A, Eder M, Eisenhut M, Linhart HG, et al. Comparison of PET imaging with a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and 18 F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:11–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Passoni NM, Suardi N, Abdollah F, Picchio M, Giovacchini G, Messa C, et al. Utility of [11C]choline PET/CT in guiding lesion-targeted salvage therapies in patients with prostate cancer recurrence localised to a single lymph node at imaging: Results from a pathologically validated series. Urol Oncol. 2014;32:38. e9-38.e16.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Winter et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement