Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Urology

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy is safe even when patients are on combination antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation therapy

  • Kimitoshi Saito1Email author,
  • Satoshi Washino1,
  • Yuhki Nakamura1,
  • Tsuzumi Konishi1,
  • Masashi Ohshima1,
  • Yoshiaki Arai2 and
  • Tomoaki Miyagawa1
BMC UrologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:53

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0245-z

Received: 9 April 2017

Accepted: 29 June 2017

Published: 5 July 2017

Abstract

Background

To assess whether hemorrhagic complications associated with transperineal prostate biopsy increased in patients on antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy.

Methods

In total, 598 consecutive patients underwent transperineal prostate biopsy. The medication group comprised patients who took anti-thromboembolic agents, and the control group comprised those who did not take these agents. No anti-thromboembolic agent was stopped before, during, or after prostate biopsy in the medication group. Complications developing in both groups were compared and classified using the modified Clavien classification system. Subgroup analyses to compare complications in patients taking single antiplatelet, single anticoagulant, and dual antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant agents, and multivariate analyses to predict bleeding risk were also performed.

Results

Of the 598 eligible patients, 149 comprised the medication group and 449 comprised the control group. Hematuria (Grade I) developed in 88 (59.1%) and 236 (52.5%) patients in the medication and control group, respectively (p = 0.18). Clot retention (Grade I) was more frequently observed in the medication group than the controls (2.0% versus 0.2%, respectively, p < 0.05). Hospitalization was more frequently prolonged in the medication than the control group (4.0% versus 0.4% of patients, respectively). No complication of Grade III or higher developed in either group. Hematuria was more frequent in patients taking a single anticoagulant (p = 0.007) or two anti-thromboembolic agents (p = 0.04) compared with those taking a single antiplatelet agent. Other complications were generally similar among the groups. In the multivariate analysis, taking more than two anti-thromboembolic agents was the only significant risk factor for bleeding events.

Conclusion

No severe complication developed after the transperineal biopsies in either group, although minor bleeding was somewhat more frequent in the medication group. It may not be necessary to discontinue anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet agents when transperineal prostate biopsy is contemplated.

Keywords

AnticoagulantAntiplateletComplicationDual antiplatelet therapyTransperineal prostate biopsy

Background

Systematic prostate biopsy is routinely performed on patients with suspected prostate cancer, to obtain tissue cores [1]. Certain hemorrhagic complications including hematuria, hematospermia, and rectal and perineal bleeding, have been reported [2]. Recently, urologists are increasingly encountering patients with multiple comorbidities including coronary arterial disease that earlier required percutaneous coronary arterial intervention with angioplasty, together with placement of bare metal or drug-eluting stent (DES). Other patients have cardiac dysrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation, valvular heart disease, or deep vein thrombosis. In others, inferior vena cava filters have been placed [3]. These comorbidities are managed using an increasing array of oral antiplatelet (AP) and anticoagulant (AC) drugs; such patients require comprehensive management to mitigate the risk of complications after urological interventions. DESs are often placed in patients with coronary artery disease; such patients cannot simply stop taking AP drugs in the perioperative period surrounding prostate biopsy.

When patients taking such drugs require surgical intervention, including transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) -guided prostate biopsy, one of the following three medication options must be chosen after detailed discussion between doctor and patient and the giving of informed consent: drug continuation, interruption, or use of a heparin bridge. Several studies have shown that aspirin increases the incidence of minor but not severe bleeding events during TRUS-guided biopsy [47]. An International Consultation on Urological Disease/American Urological Association (ICUD/AUA) review reported that prostate biopsy is safe for patients taking low-dose aspirin; the risk of minor bleeding is only approximately one-third higher than in controls [3]. However, these studies featured transrectal, not transperineal biopsy. Furthermore, it has been but seldom studied whether patients on AC therapy, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), or combination AP and AC therapy, can safely undergo prostate biopsy while remaining on these drugs.

This study evaluated whether transperineal prostate biopsy could be performed safely on patients taking Aps or ACs, without discontinuing the drugs.

Methods

Patients

This was a retrospective observational study approved by our local institutional review board. A total of 598 eligible patients underwent prostate biopsy (with collection of more than 14 tissue cores from each), on suspicion of prostate cancer, at Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, from July 2011 to December 2015. The AP/AC group comprised patients taking APs or ACs, and the remainder constituted the control group. The APs were aspirin, cilostazol, clopidogrel, and ticlopidine. The ACs were warfarin, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban. No AP or AC drug was stopped before, during, or after the prostate biopsy.

Biopsy protocol

All of the biopsies were performed via the transperineal approach, using an 18-gauge needle (Tru-Core II Automatic Biopsy Instrument, ARGON MEDICAL DEVICES, Athens, TX, USA) under general or spinal anesthesia. Each TRUS-guided systematic biopsy typically yielded 14 cores, eight from the peripheral lobe and six from the transitional lobe. In patients with suspicious lesions evident on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), two additional targeted cores were collected for each lesion. All targeted biopsies were performed using a cognitive registration technique, as described previously, with some modification [8]. As perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, levofloxacin 500 mg was prescribed once daily for 3 days. The patients were discharged the next morning.

Evaluation of comorbidities

All of the patients were evaluated about 2 weeks after the prostate biopsy at the first outpatient visit. They were asked about the incidence of bleeding-associated events and other complications. Bleeding-associated events were gross hematuria, perineal hematoma, and clot retention. Events observed at least once were included. Gross hematuria was defined as passing blood or red urine. Perineal hematoma was defined as a non-pulsatile mass > 1.5 cm in diameter diagnosed by visual examination and palpation of the perineum. Clot retention was defined as acute urinary retention due to clot. Hematospermia was not evaluated. Other complications were acute urinary retention and infection. Prolonged hospitalization was defined as a patient who was not discharged the next morning. Comorbidities were classified using the modified Clavien classification system [9].

Statistical analysis

The types and proportions of complications between the AP/AC and control groups were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed among groups taking single APs, single ACs, and dual APs and/or ACs. Statistical analysis was performed with the aid of GraphPad Prism ver. 5.0 or SPSS ver. 19.0. Data were compared using Student’s t-test, the Mann–Whitney U-test, or the chi-square test. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression analysis to determine significant predictors of bleeding events. The hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval were determined. All data shown are means and standard deviations, or medians with interquartile ranges (IQR). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Patient characteristics and biopsy outcomes

A total of 598 eligible patients underwent prostate biopsies: 149 took APs or ACs (AP/AC group), while 449 did not take APs or ACs (control group). Table 1 shows the patient characteristics and biopsy outcomes. Patients in the AP/AC group were significantly older than those in the control group (71.6 ± 6.7 vs. 68.7 ± 7.5 years; p < 0.0001). The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, prostate volume, number of biopsy cores collected, and cancer detection rate did not significantly differ between the two groups.
Table 1

Patient characteristics and cancer detection rate

 

Control, n = 449

AP/AC, n = 149

 

mean (SD)

mean (SD)

p value

Age

68.7 (7.5)

71.6 (6.7)

< 0.0001

PSA, ng/mL

10.3 (8.5)

11.4 (15.4)

0.44

Prostate volume, cm3

50.2 (24.3)

51.1 (27.8)

0.75

Biopsy cores, median (range)

16 (14–22)

16 (14–22)

0.67

Cancer detection, n (%)

254 (56.6)

93 (62.4)

0.21

PSA Prostate specific antigen, AP Antiplatelet, AC Anticoagulant

AP and AC therapy

Of the 149 patients in the AP/AC group, 80, 34, 19, and 16 were on single AP, single AC, DAPT, and combination AP and AC therapy, respectively (Table 2). Most patients in the single AP and single AC subgroups were taking aspirin (65/80 patients) or warfarin (25/34 patients). The daily dosage of aspirin, cilostazol, clopidogrel, and ticlopidine was 100 mg, 75 mg, 100–200 mg, and 100–200 mg, respectively. The daily dosage of warfarin, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban was 0.56–4.75 mg, 10–15 mg, 150–300 mg, and 5 mg, respectively. The median (IQR) prothrombin time- international normalized ratio in patients taking warfarin was 1.735 (1.420–2.053).
Table 2

Details of the antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies

  

n = 149

(%)

Single

Antiplatelet

 Aspirin

65

(43.6)

 Cilostazol

7

(4.7)

 Clopidogrel

5

(3.4)

 Ticlopidine

3

(2.0)

Total

80

(53.7)

Anticoagulant

 Warfarin

25

(16.8)

 Rivaroxaban

4

(2.7)

 Dabigatran

4

(2.7)

 Apixaban

1

(0.7)

Total

34

(22.8)

Dual

Dual antiplatelet therapy

 Aspirin + Clopidogrel

14

(9.4)

 Aspirin + Ticlopidine

3

(2.0)

 Aspirin + Cilostazol

2

(1.3)

Total

19

(12.8)

Antiplatelet + Anticoagulant

 Aspirin + Warfarin

10

(6.7)

 Other combinations

6

(4.0)

Total

16

(10.7)

Reasons for taking APs or ACs

Table 3 shows the reasons for taking APs or ACs. Ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and cerebral infarction were the first (34.9%), second (30.9%), and third (17.4%) most common reasons.
Table 3

Reason for taking antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy

 

n = 149

(%)

Ischemic heart disease

52

(34.9)

Atrial fibrillation

46

(30.9)

Cerebral infarction

26

(17.4)

Heart valve replacement surgery

13

(8.7)

Arteriosclerosis obliterans or cervical arterial stenosis

8

(5.4)

Primary prophylaxis

11

(7.4)

Others/Unknown

6

(4.1)

Complications in the AP and/or AC group versus the control group

Complications after prostate biopsy in the two groups are shown in Table 4. Grade I complications: the frequency of hematuria was similar in both groups (59.1% in the AP/AC vs. 52.5% in the control group; p = 0.18); three patients (2.0%) of the AP/AC group experienced clot retention, the incidence of which was significantly higher than in the control group (one [0.2%] patient; p = 0.049); two (1.3%) and three patients (0.7%) of the AP/AC and control groups, respectively, experienced perineal hematoma (p = 0.60); four (2.7%) and seven (1.6%) patients in the AP/AC and control groups, respectively, experienced acute urinary retention (p = 0.48). Grade II complications: two (1.3%) and one (0.2%) patient in the AP/AC and control groups, respectively, experienced urinary tract infection (p = 0.15). No Grade III or higher complication developed in either group. Six AP/AC patients required prolonged hospitalization, the incidence of which was significantly higher than in the control group (two patients [0.4%]; p = 0.01). The causes of prolonged hospitalization in AP/AC group patients were clot retention in three, perineal hematoma in one, acute urinary retention in one, and aspiration pneumonitis in one; both control group patients had perineal hematomas. No patient of either group required re-admission.
Table 4

Complications in the antiplatelet/anticoagulant group versus the control group

Modified Clavien-Dindo Classification

Complications

Control

n = 449

AP/AC

n = 149

 

n (%)

n (%)

p value

I

Hematuria

236 (52.5)

88 (59.1)

0.18

Perineal hematoma

3 (0.7)

2 (1.3)

0.60

Acute urinary retention

7 (1.6)

4 (2.7)

0.48

Clot retention

1 (0.2)

3 (2.0)

< 0.05

II

Urinary tract infection

1 (0.2)

2 (1.3)

0.15

 

Prolonged hospitalization

2 (0.4)

6 (4.0)

< 0.05

AP Antiplatelet, AC Anticoagulant

Complications in the single AP vs. the single AC vs. the dual therapy subgroups

The complications among subgroups taking single APs, single ACs, and dual antithrombotic agents are compared in Table 5. Hematuria was more frequent in the single AC (p = 0.007) and dual antithrombotic subgroups (p = 0.04) than the single AP subgroup. No other complication, nor the need for prolonged hospitalization, differed significantly among subgroups.
Table 5

Complications in the single antiplatelet or single anticoagulant versus the dual therapy subgroups

Modified Clavien Classification

Complications

Single, n = 114

Dual, n = 35

AP, n = 80

n (%)

AC, n = 34

n (%)

n (%)

I

Hematuria

38 (47.5)

26 (76.5)*

24 (68.6)*

Perineal hematoma

0

2 (5.9)

0

Acute urinary retention

1 (1.3)

2 (5.9)

1 (2.9)

Clot retention

3 (3.8)

0

0

II

Urinary tract infection

0

0

2 (5.7)

 

Prolonged hospitalization

4 (5.0)

1 (2.9)

1 (2.9)

* p < 0.05 vs. AP group, AP Antiplatelet, AC Anticoagulant

Risk factors for bleeding events

We performed a multivariate analysis to predict which patients were more likely to have bleeding events by comparing patients who experienced bleeding events, such as hematuria, perineal hematoma, and clot retention (n = 302), with those who did not (n = 257). Patients who had missing data were excluded from this analysis (n = 39). The results are shown in Table 6. Taking more than two APs/ACs was a significant predictor of bleeding events (Hazard ratio [95% CI]: 2.230 [1.028–4.839], p = 0.042), while age, PSA levels, number of biopsy cores, and prostate volume were not significant.
Table 6

Multivariate analysis to predict the risk factors for bleeding events

 

Variable

N

Hazard ratio

95% CI

p value

Age

< 70

294

-

-

 

≥ 70

265

0.931

0.657–1.319

0.687

PSA, ng/ml

< 6.0

158

-

-

 

6.0–9.9

214

0.839

0.551–1.277

0.413

≥ 10

187

0.696

0.450–1.076

0.103

Number of biopsy cores

< 16

204

-

-

 

≥ 16

355

0.974

0.683–1.389

0.883

Prostate volume, cm3

< 45.0

278

-

-

 

≥ 45.0

281

1.135

0.805–1.600

0.470

No. of AP/AC agents

0

420

-

-

 

1

105

1.339

0.863–2.076

0.193

≥ 2

34

2.230

1.028–4.839

0.042

PSA Prostate specific antigen, AP Antiplatelet, AC Anticoagulant, CI Confidence interval

Discussion

In the study, we found the following that complications arising after transperineal biopsy were generally similar in patients who were or were not taking AP/AC, although clot retention was somewhat more frequent in patients taking AP/AC agents (Table 4). In addition, patients who were taking more than two AP/AC agents were more likely to experience bleeding events (Table 6), and no complication of grade III or higher were noted in any group.

It has been suggested that 10–12 systematic biopsy cores are required for a histopathological diagnosis of prostate cancer [1]. Recently, targeted biopsies of suspicious MRI lesions have improved prostate cancer detection. However, biopsy of not only targeted lesions but also systematic prostate biopsy is required [1012]. As the number of biopsy cores increases, possible hemorrhagic complications must be considered.

In this study, we examined the safety of transperineal prostate biopsy in patients taking APs/ACs compared with controls (not on APs or ACs). The frequency of hematuria was similar in the AP/AC and control groups (Table 4). However, hemorrhagic events requiring treatment, such as clot retention and transperineal hematoma, were somewhat more frequent in the AP/AC than the control group, which might increase the frequency of prolonged hospitalization in the AP/AC group.

Halliwell et al. reported that 72% of patients taking aspirin experienced hematuria after transrectal biopsy; this value was significantly higher than the control value of 62% [5]. By contrast, Chowdhury et al. found that hematuria developed after transrectal biopsy in 28, 34, and 37% of patients on warfarin, aspirin, and controls, respectively; these proportions did not significantly differ [6]. The meta-analysis of Carmignani et al. [13] showed that hematuria was significantly more frequent among patients taking aspirin than controls (odds ratio [OR] of 1.36). However, the increased risk was for minor bleeding only. The ICUD/AUA have stated that prostate biopsy can be performed safely on patients on low-dose aspirin; the risk of minor bleeding is only approximately one-third higher than in the controls [3]. However, this suggestion held only for transrectal, and not transperineal, biopsy. Recently, Asano et al. [14] studied whether it was safe to continue antithrombotic agents in patients undergoing transperineal biopsy and found that the frequencies of hemorrhagic complications after transperineal biopsy were similar among control, continued drug administration, and interrupted drug administration groups; no severe hemorrhagic complications occurred, consistent with our results.

Patients on DAPT are increasing in line with the popularization of DESs in patients with coronary artery disease. Other patients take AP/AC combinations to treat various conditions. However, it has been unclear whether prostate biopsy was safe when patients were on two antithrombotics. Recently, Raheem et al. found that patients taking APs and/or ACs (5 and 11% of all patients studied were on aspirin-plus-warfarin or aspirin-plus-clopidogrel, respectively) had fewer hematuria episodes than controls [15]. We found that the frequency of complications did not generally differ among subgroups taking single APs, single ACs, or dual anti-thromboembolic agents, although hematuria was more frequent in the single AC and dual anti-thromboembolic subgroups than in the single AP subgroup (Table 5). In the multivariate analysis, the number of AP/AC agents was the only significant predictor of bleeding events (Table 6). No complication of grade III or higher was encountered in any group. Therefore, patients who are taking two APs or ACs may experience minor bleeding events more frequently, but will not experience severe complications after transperineal prostate biopsy.

Aspirin non-adherence/withdrawal is associated with a three-fold higher risk of major adverse cardiac events (OR 3.14) [16]. This risk is magnified in patients with intracoronary stents; discontinuation of AP treatment was associated with an even higher risk of adverse events (OR 89.78). Furthermore, aspirin interruption increases the incidence of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (OR 3.4) [17].

In 493 patients who stopped continuous anticoagulation therapy to allow the performance of dental procedures, 5 (1%) developed severe embolic complications, including four deaths [18]. Discontinuation of ACs might increase the risk of severe embolic complications. When warfarin is discontinued, a heparin bridge is recommended [19]. However, heparin bridging is controversial because it was recently demonstrated that a heparin bridge did not decrease the risks of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism in stable non-valvular atrial fibrillation [20]. Overall, discontinuation of APs/ACs is associated with severe thrombotic events; thus, the continuation of these drugs is ideal. When patients taking anti-thromboembolic agents are scheduled to undergo transperineal TRUS-guided prostate biopsy, clinicians and patients can select one of two following plans: to continue these agents with the risk of minor bleeding or to interrupt these agents with the risk of rare severe thromboembolic complications. We believe that it is more reasonable to continue anti-thromboembolic agents than to refuse to accept the slight risk of a mild bleeding event.

There were several limitations in this study. First, the retrospective nature of the work increased the risk of patient selection bias. Second, we did not assess the extent or duration of hematuria; thus, we do not know if they differed among groups. However, no Grade III or higher complication developed in any group.

Conclusions

No Grade III or higher complication developed after transperineal biopsy in either the medication or control group, although clot retention was observed somewhat more frequently in the medication group. It may not be necessary to discontinue anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents when transperineal prostate biopsy is performed.

Abbreviations

AC: 

Anticoagulant

AP: 

Antiplatelet

AUA: 

American Urological Association

DAPT: 

Dual antiplatelet therapy

DES: 

Drug-eluting stent

ICUD: 

International Consultation on Urological Disease

IQR: 

Interquartile range

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

OR: 

Odds ratio

PSA: 

Prostate specific antigen

TRUS: 

Transrectal ultrasound

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset analyzed in this study is available from the corresponding author by request.

Authors’ contributions

KS was a major contributor to the conception and design of the study and in drafting the manuscript. SW and MT analyzed and interpreted the patient data. YN, TK, MO, and YA provided administrative and technical support, including data acquisition. All of the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of our institution. The reference number is Rin 15–10. Consent to participate was waived by the ethics committee due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Urology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center
(2)
Department of Urology, Nishi-Omiya Hospital

References

  1. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. European Association of Urology. http://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer. Accessed 30 Sep 2016.
  2. Kakehi Y, Naito S, Japanese Urological Association. Complication rates of ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a nation-wide survey in Japan. Int J Urol. 2008;15:319–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Culkin DJ, Exaire EJ, Green D, Soloway MS, Gross AJ, Desai MR, et al. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in urological practice: ICUD/AUA review paper. J Urol. 2014;192:1026–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Giannarini G, Mogorovich A, Valent F, Morelli G, De Maria M, Manassero F, et al. Continuing or discontinuing low-dose aspirin before transrectal prostate biopsy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Urol. 2007;70:501–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Halliwell OT, Yadegafar G, Lane C, Dewbury KC. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: aspirin increases the incidence of minor bleeding complications. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:557–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chowdhury R, Abbas A, Idriz S, Hoy A, Rutherford EE, Smart JM. Should warfarin or aspirin be stopped prior to prostate biopsy? An analysis of bleeding complications related to increasing sample number regimes. Clin Radiol. 2012;67:e64–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Vasudeva P, Kumar N, Kumar A, Singh H, Kumar G. Safety of 12 core transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in patients on aspirin. IBJU. 2015;41:1096–100.Google Scholar
  8. Kasivisvanathan V, Dufour R, Moore CM, Ahmed HU, Abd-Alazeez M, Charman SC, et al. Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. J Urol. 2013;189:860.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mamoulakis C, Efthimiou I, Kazoulis S, Christoulakis I, Sofras F. The modified Clavien classification system: a standardized platform for reporting complications in transurethral resection of the prostate. World J Urol. 2011;29:205–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rooij M, Hamoen EHJ, Fütterer JJ, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM. Accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis. AJR. 2014;202:343–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kumar V, Jagannathan NR, Thulkar S, Kumar R. Prebiopsy magnetic resonance spectroscopy and imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Int J Urol. 2012;19:602–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Miyagawa T, Ishikawa S, Kimura T, Suetomi T, Tsutsumi M, Irie T, et al. Real-time virtual sonography for navigation during targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging data. Int J Urol. 2010;17:855–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Carmignani L, Picozzi S, Bozzini G, Negri E, Ricci C, Gaeta M, et al. Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies in patients taking aspirin for cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis. Transfus Apher Sci. 2011;45:275.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Asano T, Kobayashi S, Yano M, Otsuka Y, Kitahara S. Continued administration of antithrombotic agents during transperineal prostate biopsy. In Braz J Urol. 2015;41:116–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Raheem OA, Casey RG, Galvin DJ, Manecksha RP, Varadaraj H, McDermott T, et al. Discontinuation of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: a single-center experience. Korean J Urol. 2012;53:234–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Biondi-Zoccai GG, Lotrionte M, Agostoni P, Abbate A, Fusaro M, Burzotta F, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the hazards of discontinuing or not adhering to aspirin among 50,279 patients at risk for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:2667–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Maulaz AB, Bezerra DC, Michel P, Bogousslavsky J. Effect of discontinuing aspirin therapy on the risk of brain ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:1217–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wahl MJ. Dental surgery in anticoagulated patients. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1610–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kristensen SD, Knuuti J, Saraste A, Anker S, Bøtker HE, Hert SD, et al. 2014 ESC/ESA guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management: the joint task force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2383–431.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bouillon K, Bertrand M, Boudali L, Ducimetiere P, Dray-Spira R, Zureik M. Short-term risk of bleeding during heparin bridging at initiation of vitamin K antagonist therapy in more than 90000 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation managed in outpatient care. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;31:5–15.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement