Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case report
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Nephron-sparing management of Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis presenting as spontaneous renal hemorrhage: a case report and literature review

BMC Urology201818:57

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0354-3

Received: 27 September 2016

Accepted: 2 May 2018

Published: 5 June 2018

Abstract

Background

Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis (XGP) is an uncommon infectious disease of the kidney known to mimic other renal maladies. A rare presentation of this uncommon disease is spontaneous renal hemorrhage (SRH).

Case presentation

We report a case of XGP in a 58 year old woman who presented with abdominal pain, hematuria, and radiating left flank pain. CT scan was felt to be consistent with perirenal hemorrhage abutting a fat-containing renal mass. The patient was eventually taken to surgery for left partial nephrectomy. Pathology report returned as XGP, and the patient has no complications from this disease process at 8 month follow up.

Conclusion

Our search of the literature shows XGP presenting as SRH to be a rare clinical entity. Furthermore, this is the first such case managed with a nephron-sparing approach. The “great imitator” XGP should be added to the differential for patients presenting with spontaneous renal hemorrhage.

Keywords

Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritisSpontaneous renal hemorrhageWunderlich syndromeSubcapsular renal hematomaCase report

Background

XGP is an uncommon infectious disease of the kidney first described in 1918 by Schlagenhaufer and characterized by chronic obstruction and inflammation [1]. The chronic inflammatory renal mass invades the renal parenchyma, replacing it with lipid laden macrophages. Pathologically, the lipid laden macrophages give the renal parenchyma a “tan-yellow” appearance [2]. SRH is defined as a non-traumatic, spontaneous renal bleed into the subcapsular and/or perirenal space. It was first observed by Bonet in 1679 and further described by Wunderlich in 1856 [3, 4]. This is only the 5th case report of XGP presenting as SRH.

Herein, we reported a female presenting with abdominal pain and hematuria with radiographic findings consistent with SRH who was found to have XGP as the underlying cause of her illness. We also review the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of these two conditions.

Case presentation

A 58 year old female presented with hematuria and left flank pain that radiated to the abdomen. Computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrated a heterogeneous 8.3 X 6.5 X 4.9 cm fat-containing mass arising from the lower pole of the left kidney (Fig. 1c). CT also demonstrated an asymmetrically enlarged left psoas muscle (Fig. 1b), soft tissue stranding (Figs. 1a & 2), mild hydronephrosis, and splenomegaly (Fig. 2). Further evaluation of the CT scan goes on to reveal extensive fascial thickening involving the anterior and posterior left renal fascia. Based on these findings, hemorrhagic angiomyolipoma was felt to be the most likely condition. Past medical history was significant for bipolar disorder and chronic right foot wounds associated with contiguous spread of chronic osteomyelitis of the 5th metatarsal.
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Axial CT scan demonstrating left renal hydronephrosis a and a non enhancing lesion of the left kidney c (arrowhead). Asymmetric psosas muscle b is identified and noticeable fat stranding along the posterior peritoneal wall (arrowhead). Ureteral calyces identified and demostrate distention possibly hemorrhaging

Figure 2
Fig. 2

Coronal and sagittal CT scan demonstrating abnormal mass of left kidney, fat stranding, and hepatospenomegaly. There is a 3.5 cm round low attenuated area with peripheral calcifications in the spleen. Likely relates to prior trauma or infection

Physical exam was remarkable for enlarged body habitus (BMI 34.7), limited ROM in right shoulder, arm, and neck. Laboratory abnormalities included an elevated glucose (186 mg/dl) and calcium (6.9 mg/dl). White cell count, BUN, and creatinine levels were within normal limits. Urine culture demonstrated no growth in 18–24 h and showed < 10,000 col./ml.

The decision was made to treat the patient with open left partial nephrectomy. Intraoperatively, the mass was easily found along the inferior portion of the kidney. The mass had a large desmoplastic reaction surround it from a prior bleeding episode. Adhesions surrounding the vascular pedicle were released. The pedicle was then clamped and cold ischemia was induced after mannitol injection. Resection of the mass was performed by scoring the mass with Bovie electrocautery and carefully dissecting the mass from the normal parenchyma by blunt dissection with a Penfield nerve retractor. All bleeding vessels were ligated. There was 36 min of cold ischemia time and 200 ml of estimated blood loss. After appropriate closure of the surgical sites, the mass was sent to pathology and because of considerable need for pyelocaliceal closure a double J ureteral stent and foley were placed. Postoperatively, the patient experienced urinary retention after foley catheter removal. Once stable, she was discharged back to skilled nursing facility with a catheter in place that was later removed.

At 10 day postoperative outpatient follow up, the patient was doing well and asymptomatic. BUN and creatinine levels were within normal limits but calcium remained low. Ureteral stent was easily removed during office cystoscopy. Eight months later the patient reported no signs of flank pain or hematuria and has remained at her pre-operative baseline.

Discussion

XGP is well known for its capacity to mimic many other disorders, most notably renal neoplasms [5, 6]. Previously published case series have shown a higher incidence of disease in older women, patients obstructed from nephrolithiasis, and infection by Escherichia coli or Proteus mirabilis. [79]. XGP is classified into either the more prominent diffuse form or a focal entity [10]. It is further subdivided into 3 stages (nephric, perinephric, and paranephric) on the basis of the extent of inflammatory response. In part due to the rarity of XGP, pre-operative diagnosis is difficult with most cases diagnosed post-operatively on pathological examination. Clinical diagnosis is hampered by non-specific symptoms, and pre-operative radiologic imaging has been found to be of only moderate assistance in diagnosis [11]. While the classic “bear’s paw” sign is reasonably diagnostic of XGP, further radiologic specificity is limited by the heterogenous nature of the disease. One study of 11 patients with XGP found that 91% of patients demonstrated extrarenal extension of inflammatory changes and 82% had multiple dilated calyces and abnormal parenchyma, but 27% had focal fat deposits and a separate 27% had extensive retroperitoneal inflammation up to and including inflammation of the abdominal wall [12].

SRH, also known as Wunderlich Syndrome, is another uncommon urologic condition. The etiology of SRH is most frequently due to renal neoplasm but has also been known to arise due to vascular disease or infection [13]. While the infectious etiologies of SRH are known to include emphysematous pyelonephritis, to the best of our knowledge this is only the 5th case in the literature of XGP presenting with Wunderlich syndrome, although this is difficult to assess due to the many different terms applied to the condition [1417]. SRH may classically present with “Lenk’s triad” (acute flank pain, abdominal tenderness, and symptoms of internal bleeding), but the disease is also known to present similarly to other abdominal conditions such as appendicitis or dissecting abdominal aortic aneurysm [13, 18]. Unlike XGP, CT imaging of SRH patients is able to identify 100% of patients suffering from the disease, though it lacks sensitivity for the etiology of SRH. Ultrasound has also been used for the detection of SRH but was not shown to be as reliable.

Three of 4 XGP cases presenting with Wunderlich syndrome are summarised and can be reviewed in Table 1. Canale et al., in a letter to the editor, presents a case of retroperitoneal hemorrhage with hemorrhagic shock [15]. Briefly, a 36 year old woman presented with right lower abdominal pain with palpable mass over right pelvic area. Laboratory findings included microcytic anemia and elevated white blood cell count (12,000 per mm3). Urinalysis (UA) was positive for leukocytes and pyuria. Urine culture was negative.
Table 1

Summary of XGP cases presenting as Wunderlich syndrome

Case

Presentation

CBC

UA

Culture (urine or site)

Surgery

Pathology

Canle et al. [15], 2007

Right lower abdominal pain and asthenia

Hgb 8 9/dl

WBC 12000/mm3

+leukocyte

+Pyuria

Streptococcus anginosus

Right total nephrectomy

Foamy macrophages aggregates, neutrophils, fibrosis. Inflammatory cell infiltrate

Altinoluk et al. [17], 2012

Right flank pain, fever, nausea

Hgb 6.3 g/dl

WBC 16.7/ uL

Hematuria only

Proteus mirabilis

Right total nephrectomy

Foamy, lipid laden macrophages, giant cells, granulomatous reaction and fibrosis

Sharma et al. [16], 2013

Left flank pain, intermittent fever, weakness x15days

Hgb 9 g/dl

WBC 13500/mm3

Klebsiella

Left total nephrectomy

Chronic granulomatous pyelonephritis. With dilated vascular channels

CT scan demonstrated bilateral central staghorn calculi with replacement of renal parenchyma with low attenuated collections in a hydronephrotic pattern. CT also showed a lower pole mass in the right kidney consistent with perinephric inflammatory changes. T1 and T2 weighted MRI images of the mass showed multiple enhancing septa.

Two days following the initial presentation the patient was seen again for acute abdominal pain with a red cell count of 6 g/dl, blood pressure of 80/60, and was transferred to the intensive care unit for hemorrhagic shock. CT scan now showed an interval increase in the size of the renal mass and hemoperitoneum. After right nephrectomy pathological examination of the mass revealed abundant foamy macrophage aggregates, neutrophils, fibrosis, and inflammatory cell infiltrations, confirming the diagnosis of XGP [15].

Altinoluk et al., describe a case of XGP with spontaneous kidney rupture in a young female [16]. A 25 year old woman presented with sudden onset right flank pain associated with fever and nausea. She was previously treated for UTI the week prior. Her blood pressure was 90/55 mmHg, hemoglobin 6.3 g/dl, white blood cell count was 16,700 per mm3. UA revealed hematuria only. Abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography displayed a large hypoechoic mass (12 X 7 cm) around the right kidney which extended into the pelvis and paravertebral space. Exploration of the mass revealed a large perirenal hematoma, abscess, and renal rupture. Culture of the abscess grew Proteus mirabilis. Histopathological examination following right nephrectomy revealed foamy, lipid laden macrophages, giant cells, polymorphonuclear cells, granulomatous reaction and fibrosis. A diagnosis of XGP was made [16].

Lastly, Sharma et al., reported a case of a 60 year old male who presented with left sided flank pain, intermittent fever, and weakness for 15 days [17]. A known diabetic, the patient was anemic (Hgb 9.0) with an elevated white blood cell count (13,500 per mm3). Urine culture was positive for Klebsiella and the patient was subsequently started on IV antibiotics. MRI abdomen demonstrated a hydronephrotic left kidney with an ill-defined mass of the lower pole suggestive of perinephric hematoma. Further, the patient was suspected to have a hemorrhagic angiomyolipoma and was thus surgically explored. During exploration, the kidney was noted to be hydronephrotic with thinned out parenchyma and palpable thickening of the lower pole which warranted nephrectomy. Unlike the previous cases, lipid-laden macrophage aggregates were not seen though further histopathological examination of the mass revealed chronic granulomatous pyelonephritis with dilated vascular channels and no evidence of neoplasia [17].

Management

The traditional approach to XGP has been radical nephrectomy, though a nephron-sparing approach has been reported in the management of focal cases of XGP [1921]. Conservative management of XGP has been achieved with parenteral antibiotic therapy or a combination of oral and parenteral therapy which may be supplemented with drainage of the urinary tract and/or abscesses [2224]. Conservative management has even proven successful in renal allograft patients with XGP [25]. However, conservative management is inappropriate for patients with stage III or diffuse XGP, as may be seen in many patients at the time of diagnosis. Nephron-sparing management has been successfully attempted in cases of multifocal XGP, a distinct entity from diffuse XGP. As XGP is often diagnosed first at pathological specimen, the decision for treatment is usually based on a presumptive diagnosis in which radical nephrectomy may be more appropriate.

Management of SRH is first pursued through conservative or minimally invasive approaches. As the underlying cause of SRH may be focally identified by renal arteriography, embolization is an important therapeutic treatment that may preclude the need for surgery. In cases of iatrogenic renal hemorrhage, the combined use of urokinase injections and external drainage has been reported as an effective strategy in patients with large hematomas who nonetheless had stable vital signs [26]. This approach could also prove useful in SRH though we can find no explicit report of this in the literature. In the case of the unstable patient, surgical exploration is necessary if angioembolization is not available or is unsuccessful. Surgical exploration can be especially important if the source of the bleeding is found to be a renal neoplasm. Even in cases where bleeding can be managed conservatively, surgical evacuation of the clot may be required in instances of hypertension secondary to Page kidney.

All four previous reports of XGP presenting with SRH were managed by radical nephrectomy. We report the first case of nephron-sparing surgery for XGP presenting with SRH. Our management decision was facilitated by a pre-operative differential heavily weighted towards AML as the etiology of SRH. Prior to this procedure our approach to cases involving a large XGP lesion would have been unlikely to include a nephron-sparing approach, though we are happy to report that such an approach is certainly technically feasible.

Conclusion

This report describes a rare presentation of an uncommon infectious disease. Our review of the literature confirms the rarity of XGP presenting with SRH. The importance of a broad differential diagnosis for this condition cannot be overlooked. Nephron-sparing surgery should always be considered as a possibility even in these difficult cases.

Abbreviations

CT: 

Computed tomography

Hgb: 

Hemoglobin

SRH: 

Spontaneous renal hemorrhage

UA: 

Urinalysis

WBC: 

White blood cell count

XGP: 

Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Ray Dyer for his assistance in interpreting radiological images used in the study and for his guidance in drafting and editing this manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Authors’ contributions

MM was the responsible urologist for the patient and performed the surgery. WB, FV, & MM contributed to the concept and design of the study. WB & FV both contributed to the acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, as well as the drafting of the manuscript. MM & RD participated in the critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, material support, and supervision. RD & MM also contributed to the acquisition of valuable data, analysis and interpretation of data, and final approval of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Urology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, USA
(2)
Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA
(3)
Department of Radiology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, USA

References

  1. Schlagenhaufer F. Uber eigentumlich staphylomykosender neiven und des pararenalen bindegewebes. Frankfurt Z Pathol. 1916(19):139–48.Google Scholar
  2. Yoshino T, Moriyama H. Case of the diffuse form of Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Case Rep Urol. 2013; ID 936035: 3 pages.Google Scholar
  3. Bonet T. Sepulchretum, sive anatomiapractica ex cadaverbius morbobdenatis. Geneva: L Chouet; 1679.Google Scholar
  4. Wunderlich CR. Handbuck der Pathologie und Therapie. In: ed 2nd, editor. Polkey Vynalek. Stuttgart: Ebner and Seubert; 1856.Google Scholar
  5. Zoros I, Moutzouris V, Petraki C, et al. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis – the “great imitator” justifies its name. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2002;36:74–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Gerber WL, Catalona WJ, Fair WR, et al. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis masquerading as occult malignancy. Urology. 1978;11:466–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Addison B, Zargar H, Lilic N, Merrilees D, Rice M. Analysis of 35 cases of Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85:150–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Korkes F, Favoretto RL, Bróglio M, Silva CA, Castro MG, Perez MD. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: clinical experience with 41 cases. Urology. 2008;71:178–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim SW, Yoon BI, Ha US, Sohn DW, Cho YH. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: clinical experience with 21 cases. J Infect Chemother. 2013;19(6):1221–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Samuel M, Duffy P, Capps S, Mouriquand P, Williams D, Ransley P. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis in childhood. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36:598–601.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Malek RS, Elder JS. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: a critical analysis of 26 cases and of the literature. J Urol. 1978;119:589–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rajesh A, Jakanani G, Mayer N, Mulcahy K. Computed tomography findings in xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2011;1:45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhang JQ, Fielding JR, Zou KH. Etiology of spontaneous perirenal hemorrhage: a meta-analysis. J Urol. 2002;167:1593–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wakasugi E, Kato Y, Yano H, Kanbara N, Kurita T. Spontaneous renal rupture due to xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis; a case report. Hinyokika Kiyo. 1996;42:47–50. JapanesePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Canale S, Deux JF, De la Taille A, Bouanane M, Luciani A, Rahmouni A. Acute retroperitoneal hemorrhage complicating a xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1128–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Altinoluk B, Sayar H, Özkaya M, Sahinkanat T, Malkoc O. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis presented with spontaneous kidney rupture in a young woman. Eur J Gen Med. 2012;9:138–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Sharma A, Rehan F, Sanjay RP, Ratkal CS, Kamath AJ, Venkatesh GK. An unusual presentation of chronic granulomatous pyelonephritis presenting as an acute spontaneous retroperitoneal Hemmorhage. J Case Rep. 2013;3:114–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Albi G, del Campo L, Tagarro D. Wünderlich’s syndrome: causes, diagnosis and radiological management. Clin Radiol. 2002;57:840–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Osca JM, Peiro MJ, Rodrigo M, Martinez-Jabaloyas JM, Jimenez-Cruz JF. Focal xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: partial nephrectomy as definitive treatment. Eur Urol. 1997;32:375–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Shinde S, Kandpal DK, Chowdhary SK. Focal xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis presenting as renal tumor. Indian J Nephrol. 2013;23:76–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Peréz LM, Thrasher JB, Anderson EE. Successful management of bilateral xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis by bilateral partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 1993;149:100–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chlif M, Chakroun M, Ben Rhouma S, Ben Chehida MA, Sellami A, Gargouri MM, Nouira Y. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis presenting as a pseudotumour. Can Urol Assoc J. 2016;10:E36–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Friedl A, Tuerk C, Schima W, Broessner C. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis with staghorn Calculus, acute gangrenous appendicitis and enterocolitis: a multidisciplinary challenge of kidney-preserving conservative therapy. Curr Urol. 2015;8:162–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Brown PS, Dodson M, Weintrub PS. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: report of non surgical management of a case and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22:308–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Elkhammas EA, Mutabagani KH, Sedmak DD, Tesi RJ, Henry ML, Fergu-son RM. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis in renal allografts: report of 2 cases. J Urol. 1994;151:127–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Shen Z, He W, Liu D, Pan F, Li W, Han X, Li B. Novel technique for the treatment of large subcapsular renal hematoma: combined use of percutaneous drainage and urokinase injection. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014;46:1751–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement