Skip to main content

Anti-TNF agents and potential effects on male fertility: are men being counseled?



Adult men with autoimmune conditions are commonly prescribed anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents; however, there is a paucity of quality evidence as to their effect on male fertility (e.g. semen parameters and sperm quality). Our objective was to determine if men with autoimmune conditions are being counseled regarding the unknown reproductive effects of anti-TNF agents prior to initiation of therapy.


A retrospective analysis of 1010 male patients age 18–45 who were prescribed an anti-TNF agent were assessed for (1) receipt of counseling regarding potential reproductive effects; (2) screening for anatomic or laboratory abnormalities associated with infertility; (3) election for sperm cryopreservation.


Only 10.3% of men received counseling, and this was not associated with age (p = 0.77). Those who received counseling were significantly more likely to have a genitourinary exam performed, be assessed for presence of a varicocele, be asked about or endorse low libido or erectile dysfunction, have a testosterone, LH, FSH, or prolactin level checked, and have a semen analysis performed (all, p < 0.0001). Rates of sperm cryopreservation were low, but statistically higher in men who received counseling (5.77% (+) counseling, 1.10% (−) counseling) (p = 0.002).


The limited current literature lacks a consensus regarding the short- and long-term male reproductive effects of anti-TNF therapy. Despite this lack of clarity, rates of pre-initiation counseling were low. Rates of sperm cryopreservation, while improved in the counseled group remained low, suggesting prescribing physicians may be unaware of this option for patients.

Peer Review reports


Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockade has revolutionized the treatment of autoimmune conditions such as inflammatory joint and bowel disease, helping to reduce disease-associated morbidity and mortality [1]. However, the impact of these agents on male fertility is unclear based on the limited current literature. While the role of TNF in male spermatogenesis is still under investigation, the basic science literature suggests TNF plays critical role in spermatogenesis and maintaining the blood-testis barrier [2,3,4]. TNF is produced by germ cells and acts as a paracrine cytokine, binding to both Sertoli and Leydig cells [2,3,4]. Suominen et al. demonstrated that TNF is important in regulating germ cell apoptosis by promoting germ cell survival, which is blocked by infliximab (a TNF antagonist) [5]. Furthermore, sperm production was found to be reduced by 54% in a TNF-related-to-apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) deficient mouse model in whom TNF signaling is impaired [6]. While TNF is integral to spermatogenesis, if unregulated, high levels of TNF can also be detrimental by leading to testicular inflammation [7]. Therefore, maintaining an adequate equilibrium is essential.

The effect of TNF blockade on human fertility is poorly understood. While two small studies have shown no deleterious effect of anti-TNF agents on semen quality, spermatogenesis, production of anti-sperm antibodies, and testosterone levels [8, 9], others have demonstrated increased risk for asthenospermia (decreased sperm motility) [10,11,12] and impaired sperm morphology [12, 13]. In the rheumatology literature, concern has been raised of cases where sperm counts were significantly reduced following initiation of an anti-TNF agent [14]. Despite the “very low level of evidence” for the effects of anti-TNF agents on male fertility, a review of drug effects on male fertility by Semet et al. states that sperm cryopreservation and discontinuation of treatment for fertility concerns is not necessary for males initiating anti-TNF therapy [15].

Given the discordant research regarding specific reproductive effects, our objective was to ascertain if men prescribed anti-TNF agents are being: (1) counseled regarding potential for adverse reproductive effects; (2) screened for anatomic or laboratory abnormalities associated with infertility; and (3) electing for sperm cryopreservation.


We performed an IRB-approved (STU00205946), retrospective chart review of 1010 male patients between the ages of 18 and 45 from January 2006 to September 2017 seen at a single academic medical center. Additional inclusion criteria included having never been prescribed an anti-TNF agent prior to the study period and being prescribed only one anti-TNF agent during the study period. Men prescribed multiple anti-TNF agents during the study period were excluded from analysis. Anti-TNF agents prescribed in this study were adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept, golimumab, and certolizumab.

Counseling was defined as a documented discussion (for example, office visit note or documented telephone encounter) between the patient and prescribing provider that the prescribed agent may pose a risk to reproduction or fertility. The counseling must have occurred prior to starting treatment. To assess if men were screened for anatomic or laboratory abnormalities associated with infertility, we determined if men received (1) a genitourinary exam, (2) screening for varicocele, (3) diagnosis or assessment for low libido, (4) testosterone, FSH, LH, and/or prolactin level, (5) semen analysis (separate from cryopreservation), and (6) sperm cryopreservation. Genitourinary examination was confirmed by a documented assessment of the penis, meatus, and/or testes. Varicocele screening must have included a documentation of absence of varicocele or a grading score and laterality of assessed varicocele by palpation. Sperm cryopreservation included only men who elected cryopreservation. All six parameters may have occurred at the initial visit when the anti-TNF agent was prescribed or during their course of treatment (not necessarily by prescribing provider). Demographic information including marital status, race, and ethnicity were determined from the medical record. Patient diagnosis was defined as prescribing clinician diagnosis entered in the medical record at the time the anti-TNF agent was prescribed.

Each pharmaceutical approved for use in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has a corresponding highlights of prescribing information sheet, which includes information regarding known impact of a drug on fertility. Highlights of prescribing information sheets were assessed for statements and literature references regarding impact of each anti-TNF agent on male fertility (Table 2).

Data was analyzed using GraphPad Prism. Categorical variables and proportion of events between those that did or did not receive counseling were compared using chi-square test. Means with standard deviation were compared using Student’s t-test after determining normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test). A p value ≤0.05 was considered significant.



A total of 1010 men met inclusion criteria for this study. Demographic information for included patients is provided in Table 1. In summary, average age was 32.4 years and mean duration of treatment was 832 days (2.3 years). The cohort was predominantly white (67.62%) and non-Hispanic (76.44%). The majority of participants were single (non-married) (58.51%). Men in this study were most likely to be diagnosed with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis (35.05%), inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn’s [21.10%] and ulcerative colitis [17.62%]), or ankylosing spondylitis (10.99%). The most common prescribers were dermatologists, gastroenterologists, and rheumatologists.

Table 1 Demographics of study patients

Evaluation of anti-TNF agent prescribing information to consumers and clinicians

FDA prescribing information sheets for anti-TNF agents assessed in this study were evaluated for discussion of impact of each medication on male fertility (Table 2). The prescribing information for the three most common prescribed agents in this study, adalimumab, infliximab and etanercept, stated the impact of these agents on fertility is unknown [16,17,18]. While animal studies have been performed to evaluate fertility following use of golimumab and certolizumab, there is no reference, study results, or study methods provided for critical review [19, 20].

Table 2 Impact of anti-TNF agents on fertility from FDA prescribing information

Men prescribed anti-TNF agents rarely receive counseling regarding potential impact on fertility

Prior to starting an anti-TNF agent for the first time, 10.3% of men received counseling regrading potential impact on fertility (Table 3). Men who received counseling were significantly more likely to have a genitourinary exam performed, be screened for a varicocele, be asked about concerns with libido or sexual function, have a testosterone, LH, FSH or prolactin level checked, have a semen analysis performed, and elect for sperm cryopreservation (Table 3). Men who received counseling were significantly more likely to elect for sperm cryopreservation, but rates of cryopreservation were low in both groups (5.77% (+) counseling, 1.10% (−) counseling). Age was not a statistically significant factor related to likelihood to receive counseling (p = 0.77).

Table 3 Men with pre-initiation counseling are more likely to undergo reproductive assessment and sperm cryopreservation


Anti -TNF agents are commonly prescribed to young adult men with autoimmune conditions on a long-term basis. While it is known on a molecular level that TNF is required for optimal spermatogenesis, the literature currently lacks large cohort, randomized, prospective evidence to adequately answer this question. Furthermore, according to the FDA highlights of prescribing information for each anti-TNF agent evaluated in this study, the majority stated the impact of the agent on fertility was unknown. Those that reported no risk did not provide literature or study reference to allow for evaluation of their data (Table 2). Despite this lack of quality of evidence, the recommendations found in the literature suggest sperm cryopreservation or discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy for male fertility concerns is not necessary [15]. This discordant information available to prescribers in the literature may help to explain why only 10.3% of over 1000 men prescribed an anti-TNF agent in our study cohort received counseling as to potential adverse effects on fertility. This suggests that patients and clinicians may be unaware of this knowledge gap or may not be documenting the fertility aspect of their discussion.

Furthermore, men prescribed anti-TNF agents are a unique population in that their primary disease (e.g. inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or ankylosing spondylitis) can affect sexual function and desire, which could also impact their fertility. Men with IBD, for example, have been shown to have increased rates of hypogonadism, reduced sexual interest, difficulty achieving or maintaining erection, and higher rates of depression compared to age matched controls [21,22,23,24]. Additionally, men with ankylosing spondylitis suffer from debilitating arthritis, spinal stiffness, and loss of spinal mobility which has been associated with impaired erectile function, arousal, and sexual satisfaction [25]. Our study demonstrated that the majority of men were not asked about libido or sexual function, which is a common problem that can significantly impact quality of life. Furthermore, while hypogonadism has been associated with increased systemic inflammatory markers and risk of autoimmune conditions in men, restoration of eugonadism has not been demonstrated to our knowledge with control of underlying autoimmune disease [26]. For example, Cutolo et al. demonstrated that use of anti-TNF agents did not change systemic levels of sex androgens in men with rheumatoid arthritis [27].

We found that if men received counseling regarding potential for adverse reproductive effects when taking anti-TNF agents, they were significantly more likely to be screened for anatomic abnormalities (e.g. meatal stenosis, varicocele, small testis volume) and have laboratory tests associated with infertility (e.g. testosterone level, semen analysis) performed. While this is only an association, it suggests that discussion of fertility may prompt further examination and workup to screen for other factors that may affect fertility. Lastly, rates of sperm cryopreservation were significantly higher in men who received counseling but were very low overall (< 6%). This suggests that clinicians may not be aware of this option or how best to approach the topic with patients, which has been demonstrated in other patient populations, such as men diagnosed with cancer [28, 29].

This study is limited by its retrospective nature, reliance on documentation by providers, and being a single institution study. Our data suggests that the impact of anti-TNF agents on male fertility is largely unknown as reported by the FDA prescribing information for each agent. Furthermore, it suggests rates of counseling regarding this topic are low. Given our study is from a single center only, we cannot generalize our findings to education received by all men who are started on anti-TNF therapy. Additionally, information available to providers and practice patterns may have changed over the timeline of this study (2006–2017). Until further research delineates the effect of anti-TNF agents on male fertility, we urge clinicians to counsel patients about this lack of evidence and discuss the option of fertility preservation measures, out of an abundance of caution, prior to starting treatment.


The impact of anti-TNF agents on human male fertility is unclear, with the basic science and clinical literature published to date lacking conclusive evidence on the short and long term reproductive effects of anti-TNF therapy. Despite this lack of clarity, our data suggests that men are not being counseled regarding the potential for adverse reproductive outcomes. Furthermore, rates of sperm cryopreservation and discussion of sexual history in this population were low. A large, prospective study assessing the impact of anti-TNF agents on semen parameters, sexual health, and overall fertility outcomes is needed in order to better identify impacts of therapy, so physicians can more effectively counsel patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. FDA information for anti-TNF agents can be found at the following links:



Inflammatory bowel disease


Food and Drug Administration


Follicle stimulating hormone


Luteinizing hormone


Tumor necrosis factor


TNF-related-to-apoptosis-inducing ligand


  1. 1.

    Li P, Zheng Y, Chen X. Drugs for autoimmune inflammatory diseases: from small molecule compounds to anti-TNF agents. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ricciolo A, Starace D, D’Alessio A, Starace G, Padula F, De Cesaris P, et al. TNF-a and IFN-y regulate the expression and function of the Fas system in the seminiferous epithelium. J Immunol. 2000;165:743–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Li MW, Xia W, Mruk DD, Wang CQ, Yan HH, Siu MK, et al. Tumor necrosis factor (alpha) reversibly disrupts the blood testis barrier and impairs Sertoli-germ cell adhesion in the seminiferous epithelium of adult rat testes. J Endocrinol. 2006;190:313–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Loveland KL, Klein B, Puescl D, Indumathy S, Bergmann M, Loveland BE, et al. Cytokines in male fertility and reproductive pathologies: immunoregulation and beyond. Front Endocrinol. 2017;8:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Suominen JS, Yanyan W, Kaipia A, Toppari J. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a) promotes cell survival during spermatogenesis, and this effect can be blocked by infliximab, a TNF-a antagonist. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004;151:629–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lin Y, Richburg JH. Characterization of the role of tumor necrosis factor apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) in spermatogenesis through the evaluation of Trail gene-deficient mice. PLoS One. 2014;9:e93926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    O’Bryan MK, Hedger MP. Inflammatory networks in the control of spermatogenesis: chronic inflammation in an immunologically privileged tissue? Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;636:92–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Villiger PM, Caliezi G, Cottin V, Forger F, Senn A, Ostensen M. Effects of TNF antagonists on sperm characteristics in patients with spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1842–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Micu MC, Micu R, Surd S, Girlovanu M, Bolboaca SD, Ostensen M. TNF-α inhibitors do not impair sperm quality in males with ankylosing spondylitis after short-term or long-term treatment. Rheumatology. 2014;53:1250–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Montagna GL, Malesci D, Buono R, Valentini G. Asthenoazoospermia in patients receiving anti-tumour necrosis factor (alpha) agents. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:1667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mahadevan U, Terdiman JP, Aron J, Jacobsohn S, Turek P. Infliximab and semen quality in men with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11:395–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Serghini M, Fekih M, Karoui S, Ben Mustapha N, Kallel L, Matri S, et al. Fertility and inflammatory bowel diseases. Tunis Med. 2010;88:623–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mahadevan U. Fertility and pregnancy in the patient with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2006;55:1198–206.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wildi LM, Haraoui B. Reversible male infertility under treatment with an anti-TNFa agent: a case report. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:473–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Semet M, Paci M, Saias-Magnan J, Metzler-Guillermian C, Boissier R, Lejeune H, et al. The impact of drugs on male fertility: a review. Andrology. 2017;5:640–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    FDA highlights of prescribing information: Humira. Revised 2011. [Internet. Accessed November 1, 2018.] Available from:

  17. 17.

    FDA highlights of prescribing information: Remicade. Revised 2013. [Internet. Accessed November 1, 2018.] Available from:

  18. 18.

    FDA highlights of prescribing information: Enbrel. Revised 2012. [Internet. Accessed November 1, 2018.] Available from:

  19. 19.

    FDA highlights of prescribing information: Simponi. Revised 2011. [Internet. Accessed November 1, 2018.] Available from:

  20. 20.

    FDA highlights of prescribing information: Cimzia. Revised 2017. [Internet. Accessed November 1, 2018.] Available from:

  21. 21.

    Blotiere PO, Rudant J, Barre A, Racine A, Weill A, Peyrin-Biroulet L, et al. Conditions of prescription of anti-TNF agents in newly treated patients with inflammatory bowel disease in France (2011-2013). Dig Liver Dis. 2016;48:620–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Curtis JR, Singh JA. The use of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: current and emerging paradigms of care. Clin Ther. 2011;33:679–707.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Knowles SR, Gass C, Macrae F. Illness perceptions in IBD influence psychological status, sexual heath and satisfaction, body image, and relational functioning: a preliminary exploration using structural equation modeling. J Chrons Colitis. 2013;7:e344–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Timmer A, Bauer A, Kemptner D, Furst A, Rogler G. Determinants of male sexual function in inflammatory bowel disease: a survey-based cross sectional analysis in 280 men. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;13:1236–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Liu Y, Dong H, Chen Z, Wang Y, Tu SH. Impact of ankylosing spondylitis on sexual function: a systemic review and meta analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2015;9:1501–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Baillargeon J, Snih SA, Raji MA, Urban RJ, Sharma G, Sheffield-Moore M, et al. Hypogonadism and the risk of rheumatic autoimmune disease. Clinc Rheumatol. 2016;35(12):2983–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Cutolo M, Sulli A, Capellino S, Villaggio B, Montanga P, Pizzorni C, et al. Anti- TNF and sex hormones. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1069:391–400.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Osterberg S, Ramasamy R, Masson P, Brannigan RE. Current practices in fertility preservation in male cancer patients. Urol Ann. 2014;6:13–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Vindrola-Padros C, Dyer K, Cyrus J, Lubker IM. Healthcare professionals’ views on discussing fertility preservation with young cancer patients: a mixed method systemic review of the literature. Psychooncology. 2017;26:4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


No funding source to declare.

Author information




LFC was involved in study conceptual design, data gathering, data analysis and interpretation, and was a major contributor to manuscript writing and editing. JW was involved in study conceptual design, manuscript writing and editing. MKK was involved in data gathering, manuscript writing and editing. IL was involved in data gathering, data analysis, and manuscript editing. NB was involved in study conceptual design, manuscript writing and editing. REB was involved in study conceptual design, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

*LFC, Cooley MD PhD, Urology Resident

*JW, Wren MD, Assistant Professor of Urology

*MKK, Keeter MPH, Senior Research Program Coordinator

*IL, Lam BS, Medical Student

*NB, Bennett MD, Associate Professor of Urology

*REB, Brannigan MD, Chief of Male Reproductive Medicine and Men’s Health and Professor of Urology

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert E. Brannigan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Northwestern University institutional review board (IRB) (STU00205946). Consent of participants was waived given its retrospective nature and all participants were deidentified.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cooley, L.F., Wren, J., Keeter, M.K. et al. Anti-TNF agents and potential effects on male fertility: are men being counseled?. BMC Urol 20, 111 (2020).

Download citation


  • Infertility
  • Counseling
  • Anti-TNF
  • Sperm cryopreservation
  • Autoimmune