Skip to main content

Clinicopathologic, treatment and prognosis study of 46 Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion renal cell carcinomas

Abstract

Purpose

To report the clinicopathological features and mid- to long-term oncologic results of Xp11.2 translocation/transcription factor E3 (TFE3) gene fusion renal cell carcinomas (Xp11.2 translocation RCCs) in a single large-volume centrecentre.

Methods

Clinical and follow-up data of 46 patients who were diagnosed with Xp11.2 translocation RCC and underwentunderwent surgical intervention were retrospectively reviewed.

Result

Forty-six Xp11.2 translocation RCC patients were identified from 4218 renal tumour patients who were underwentunderwent surgery in our centrecentre from Jan. 2014 to Apr. 2020. The incidence of Xp11.2 translocation RCCs in our centre was 1.09%. During a median follow-up period of 30.5 months, 4 patients died of the disease. The total median overall survival and cancer specific survival were 30.0 months and 24.0 months, respectively. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 97.4%, 88.8%, and 88.8%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, displaying symptoms when diagnosed (p = 0.019), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.002) and distal metastasis (p = 0.020) were identified as risk factors for poor prognosis.

Conclusion

Xp11.2 translocation RCC is a type of renal cell carcinoma with a relatively low incidence and various prognoses. Early-stage Xp11.2 translocation RCCs have a similar prognosis to most typical RCCs, but late-stage Xp11.2 translocation RCCs can lead to poor oncological outcomes.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (Xp11.2 translocation RCC), first classified by WHO in 2004, is characterized by different tanslocations involving chromosome Xp11.2 and consequently results in gene fusions of the transcription factor E3 gene (TFE3) [1]. The tumour is frequently diagnosed in children and teenagers, accounting for approximately 20 ~ 40% of all renal malignancies in children, but rarely occurs in adults with merely 1 ~ 1.6% [2]. Although the total number of adult Xp11.2 translocation RCC patients still remains high due to the large population, the prognosis of the disease remains controversial. Previous studies reported a relatively better prognosis in children than in adults [3]. However, a recent meta-analysis of 15 studies reviewing 147 Xp11.2 translocation RCC patients demonstrated no significant difference observed in prognosis between children and adults, or between males and females [4]. On this basis, the main purpose of this retrospective study was to provide mid- to long-term survival data from a large cohort from a single centre and to analyse the potential risk factors for a poor prognosis of Xp11.2 translocation RCCs.

Methods and materials

Patient selection

A retrospective was performed for all the Xp11.2 translocation RCC patients treated at Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University from January 2014 to April 2020. The diagnosis and grading criteria of Xp11.2 translocation RCC in the current study were based on the 2016 WHO classification [5]. Clinical information including age, sex, symptoms of onset, tumour diameter, tumour location, pathological information, and surgical information was reviewed. Follow-up data were collected for the original surgeons.

Tumour size and gross appearance were obtained from the original pathologic reports, while the TNM stage was assessed according to the 8th edition of AJCC TNM staging [6]. Paraffin sections of all selected cases were reviewed by two independent pathologists (ZW and QL) for re-evaluation of nuclear grade according to ISUP criteria, as well as the histological pattern [7].

Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS® version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States) and GraphPad Prism 6 (San Diego, CA, United States). Data are presented as the median ± SD. Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were calculated with Kaplan–Meier curves. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the prognostic factors by univariable analysis. p values (two-sided) less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Forty-six patients were identified from 4218 patients who underwentunderwent partial or radical nephrectomy in Renji Hospital.

Clinical information

The clinical data are summarized in Table 1. In total 46 patients were included in the current cohort, including nineteen male patients and twenty-seven female patients. The mean age was 39 years (ranging from 15 to 72). The tumour was accompanied by clinical symptoms at the time of diagnosis in 9 patients, which including four patients who complained of lumbar pain, four patients with haematuria and one patient with severe pelvic pain due to metastatic lesions. None of these patients in the cohort had developed any other malignancies before. However, two patients had lymphatic metastasis, one had bone metastasis, one had lung metastasis and one had both lymphatic and hepatic metastasis before surgery.

Table 1 Clinicopathological features of 46 Xp11.2 RCC patients

Sixteen patients underwentunderwent radical nephrectomy, including three cytoreductive surgeries, while thirty patients received partial nephrectomy either by laparoscopic or open approaches. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was performed for patients with suspected lymphatic metastasis or a rather large tumour size (≥ cT2).

Pathological characteristics

All tumours examined were unilateral and unifocal. The maximum diameter of the tumours ranged from 12 to 109 mm, and the median maximum diameter was 40 mm (IQR 18.5 ~ 60.5).

Most tumours arose in the renal cortex, with soft or firm texture. Although there was no distinctive gross appearance, in most Xp11.2 translocation RCC cases, the cut surface colouration was usually yellowish, which was different from the typical golden yellow colour in clear cell carcinoma (Fig. 1). Beyond that, haemorrhages and necrosis were occasionally noted.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The gross appearance of typical Xp11.2 translocation RCC. A The tumour arose in the renal cortex with a yellowish cut surface with haemorrhage. B The tumour was well circumscribed and solid. The cut surface showed a light brown colour with necrosis

In most cases, the histologic appearance of Xp11.2 translocation RCC is a neoplasm with mixed tubular and papillary structure, with cells of different morphology including clear or eosinophilic cytoplasm. Psammoma bodies, lymphocytes infiltration, and necrosis were found in most Xp11.2 translocation RCCs (Fig. 2A–E).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Representative pathologic image of Xp11.2 translocation RCC. A Tumour composed of clear and eosinophilic cells with psammoma bodies. B A neoplasm with a tubular and papillary structures. C Tumour cells with clear cytoplasm formed tubules with abundant psammoma bodies resembling a clear cell renal cell carcinoma. D Diffuse nuclear staining was detected. E The nucleus showed diffuse, strong staining for TFE3. F The demonstration of TFE3 gene rearrangement by FISH. One fused signal (yellow arrow) and two split signals (green and red arrow). (AC Magnification: × 40; DE Magnification: × 100; F: Magnification: × 1000)

In the current cohort, all cases showed positive TFE3 staining. Diffuse nuclear staining was detected under microscope. The nuclei showed diffuse, strong staining for TFE3.

In FISH analysis, TFE3 gene rearrangement was detected by using a dual-colour break-apart FISH probe (Anbiping Inc., Grangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Fig. 2F).

Follow-up results

Patients were followed up for 4 to 74 months, with a median follow-up duration of 30.5 months. By the ultimate follow-up deadline, 6 patients had tumour recurrence or metastasis, among whom 4 patients died of the disease. The total median overall survival and cancer specific survival were 30.0 months and 24.0 months, respectively. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 97.4%, 88.8%, and 88.8%, respectively.

In patient #4, who underwentunderwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for a 68 mm tumour with a negative surgical margin in pathologic diagnosis, local recurrence was found 4 months after surgery, and underwent another radical nephrectomy. The patient remained alive untill the end of follow-up. In patient #25, who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for a 32 mm tumour, lung metastasis was found 6 months after surgery. The patient received Axitinib for targeted therapy thereafter but still died 24 months after the initial surgery. Patient #29 was a pT1aN0M1 patients with bone metastasis who underwent both laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and resection of bone metastatic lesions. The patient received Pazopanib one month after surgery and combined with Nivolumab since 2019. The patient remained alive untill the end of follow-up. In patient #37, a T1aN0M0 patient underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, multifocal metastases including lung, bone and lymph nodes were found 22 months after surgery. The patient received targeted therapy and died 34 months postoperatively. In patient #44, a pT1bN1M1 patient with liver and lymph node metastasis, multifocal metastasis was found in lung and liver shortly after cytoreductive nephrectomy, and the patient died 8 months after surgery. In patient #46, a pT2aN0M1 patient with lung metastasis treated with cytoreductive nephrectomy, the lung metastatic focus was enlarged despite of target therapy, and the patient died 10 months after surgery.

By evaluating potential survival factors, such as age, sex, tumour location, tumour size, T classification, lymph node metastasis, distal metastasis utilizing univariable Cox regression analysis and Kaplan–Meier analysis, we found that patients with symptoms when diagnosed (p = 0.019), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.002) and distal metastasis (p = 0.020) were associated with a poor oncologic outcome.

Discussion

In the 2004 WHO classification of renal tumours, renal carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocational/TFE3 gene fusions (Xp11.2 translocation RCCs) was first accepted as a distinct subtype of RCC [1]. Xp11.2 translocation RCC is characterized by the translocation on chromosome Xp11.2 and a gene fusion between TFE3 and several different genes, including ASPL (17q25), CLTC (17q23), NonO (Xp12), PSF (1q34), and PRCC (1q21) [8]. Previous reports demonstrated that the overall incidence of Xp11.2 translocation RCC is low and mainly occurs in children and young people [2]. However, due to the relatively low incidence, the population characteristics, clinical characteristics and oncological outcomes remain controversial [4, 9]. On this bias, we present the clinical findings and follow-up results of 46 Xp11.2 translocation RCC patients in our centre.

The incidence of Xp11.2 translocation RCCs in our centre was 1.09%, which is coincident with the 1% to 1.6% occurrence reported before [2, 8, 9]. During a median follow-up period of 30.5 months, 4 patients died of the disease. The total median overall survival and cancer specific survival were 30.0 months and 24.0 months, respectively. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 97.4%, 88.8%, and 88.8%.

Traditionally, Xp11.2 translocation RCC is associated with advanced tumour stage and poor oncological outcome due to aggressive biological behavior [10]. In previous studies, more than half of Xp11.2 translocation RCC patients were found to have metastatic lesions and consequently died of the disease [11, 12]. However, in our cohort, only 4 patients displayed lymph node or distal metastasis at the time of diagnosis.

There seem to be no specific macroscopic appearance characteristics of Xp11.2 translocation RCCs. In the current study, most tumour presented a gross appearance of a sulfur yellow to grey cut surface along with haemorrhage and necrosis, which is commonly found in clear cell carcinomas. The microscopic appearance includes papillary, tubular, nested and mixed patterns. In our study, we also found the presence of clear cells in several cases, which was also reported previously. One recognizable microscopic finding of Xp11.2 translocation RCCs is the presence of psammoma bodies. TFE 3 immunostaining is the most commonly used method for diagnosing Xp11.2 translocation RCCs. According to the literature, the specificity and sensitivity of IHC was 99.6% and 97.5%, respectively. [13] Previously, many Xp11.2 translocation RCCs were misdiagnosed as type II pRCCs or ccRCCs due to limited understanding and heterogeneous pathologic appearance. Now, with the introduction of the FISH assay in 2011, the TFE3 break-apart FISH assay has become indispensable diagnostic method for Xp11.2 translocation RCCs [14, 15]. The diagnosis of 46 Xp11.2 translocation RCCs in the current study was confirmed by FISH analysis.

In the current study, we report 46 Xp11.2 translocation RCC patients with 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS rates of 97.4%, 88.8%, and 88.8%, respectively. The result indicates a considerable long-term survival, which approximately equals the 5-year overall survival of RCCs. (SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2014, based on November 2016 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER website, April 2017: National Cancer Institute.) The same follow-up outcome was also reported by Klatte et al., who identified 2 Xp11.2 translocation RCCs from 848 RCC cases through FISH and PCR [2]. However, the current existing large-scale studies report poorer overall survival and cancer-specific survival of Xp11.2 translocation RCCs than non-Xp11.2 translocation RCCs [9,10,11,12]. Regarding the contrast between two different outcomes, by reviewing the cohort, one possible reason we found may be the high proportion of cT1 Xp11.2 tumours in the current cohort. In previous studies, the reported approximate proportion of cT1 ~ 2 stage was 36.4% ~ 64.4% [10, 11, 16], however, this rate in current study was 91.1%. This may be probably due to the development of imaging devices that enables the early detection of RCCs in their early stages. This phenomenon may also indicate that as long as treated at its early stage (cT1 ~ 2), Xp11.2 translocation RCCs can present as good a prognosis as other types of RCCs.

Since the translocation happens on the X chromosome, there exists the hypothesis that the Xp11.2 translocation RCCs may have a gender-related predominance in the incidence in females [17]. In our study, the same result was reported. Beyond that, in multifactor analysis, there was no significant difference between females and males in the incidence of lymph node metastasis and distal metastasis and overall survival, which is similar to the report of Cheng et al.17. Furthermore, by evaluating the potential risk factors for poor prognosis, we identified independent risk factors including displaying symptoms when diagnosed (p = 0.019), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.002) and distal metastasis (p = 0.020). The result is also coincident with those in other types of RCCs.

However, there are still limitations in the current study. Even though the current cohort is one of the largest Xp11.2 translocation RCC cohorts, the number is still too insufficient to draw decisive conclusions. The retrospective and single-centre design of the study also led to many biases. Therefore, large-scale multicentre studies with more detailed clinical and laboratory information are required in the future.

In summary, we reported mid-to-long-term oncological outcomes of a 46-patient Xp11.2 translocation RCC cohort from a single centre and identified some prognostic clinical factors. By reviewing previous studies of Xp11.2 translocation RCCs and other non-Xp11.2 translocation RCC types, we came to the primary conclusion that Xp11.2 translocation RCCs found and treated in their early stages may have as good a prognosis as many other types of RCCs. On the other hand, Xp11.2 translocation RCCs with clinical symptoms, regional lymph node metastasis or distal metastasis may have relatively poor clinical outcomes and are not sensitive to VEGF-targeted therapy, but ICI may have a potential therapeutic effect.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets from this study can be found in the cited guidelines. Analyses can be obtained from corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Lopez-Beltran A, Scarpelli M, Montironi R, Kirkali Z. 2004 WHO classification of the renal tumors of the adults. Eur Urol. 2006;49:798–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Klatte T, Streubel B, Wrba F, et al. Renal cell carcinoma associated with transcription factor E3 expression and Xp11.2 translocation: incidence, characteristics, and prognosis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;137:761–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. He J, Chen X, Gan W, et al. Renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusions: clinical experience and literature review. Future Oncol. 2015;11:3243–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng X, Gan W, Zhang G, Li X, Guo H. Clinical characteristics of XP11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMC Urol. 2016;16:40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moch H, Cubilla AL, Humphrey PA, Reuter VE, Ulbright TM. The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-part a: renal, penile, and testicular tumours. Eur Urol. 2016;70:93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Paner GP, Stadler WM, Hansel DE, Montironi R, Lin DW, Amin MB. Updates in the Eighth Edition of the Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging Classification for Urologic Cancers. Eur Urol 2018;73:560–569.

  7. Delahunt B, Cheville JC, Martignoni G, et al. The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for renal cell carcinoma and other prognostic parameters. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:1490–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Qu Y, Gu C, Wang H, et al. Diagnosis of adults Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma by immunohistochemistry and FISH assays: clinicopathological data from ethnic Chinese population. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21677.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu N, Wang Z, Gan W, et al. Renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp112 translocation/tfe3 gene fusions: clinical features, treatments and prognosis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0166897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lim B, You D, Jeong IG, et al. Clinicopathological features of Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma. Korean J Urol. 2015;56:212–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuthi L, Somoracz A, Micsik T, et al. Clinicopathological findings on 28 cases with XP11.2 renal cell carcinoma. Pathol Oncol Res. 2020;26:2123–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Choo MS, Jeong CW, Song C, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma: multicenter, propensity score matching analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017;15:e819–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Argani P, Lal P, Hutchinson B, Lui MY, Reuter VE, Ladanyi M. Aberrant nuclear immunoreactivity for TFE3 in neoplasms with TFE3 gene fusions: a sensitive and specific immunohistochemical assay. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:750–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rao Q, Williamson SR, Zhang S, et al. TFE3 break-apart FISH has a higher sensitivity for Xp11.2 translocation-associated renal cell carcinoma compared with TFE3 or cathepsin K immunohistochemical staining alone: expanding the morphologic spectrum. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:804–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mosquera JM, Dal Cin P, Mertz KD, et al. Validation of a TFE3 break-apart FISH assay for Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinomas. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2011;20:129–37.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu N, Qu F, Shi Q, et al. Nephron-sparing surgery for adult Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma at clinical T1 stage: a multicenter study in China. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:1238–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhuang W, Liu N, Guo H, Zhang C, Gan W. Gender difference analysis of Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinomas’s attack rate: a meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Urol. 2020;20:130.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study received funding from the Three-Year-Action-Project (No: 16CR3062B) of Shanghai Shen Kang Hospital Development Centre, Clinical Research Plan of SHDC (SHDC2020CR6008) and the Medical-Engineering cross fund of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (No: YG2017QN46).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

(I) Conception and design: JZ & YC. (II) Administrative support: YC & QL. (III) Accumulation of data: JZ, LZ. (IV) Data analysis and interpretation: JZ & XW. (V) Manuscript writing: JZ. (VI) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaorong Wu or Wei Xue.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The study was approved by research medical ethics committee of Shanghai Renji Hospital, China (Ethics board approval number: Renji Ethics [2017]091). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants. Informed consent was retrieved from all patients in this research.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, J., Zhao, L., Yang, Z. et al. Clinicopathologic, treatment and prognosis study of 46 Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion renal cell carcinomas. BMC Urol 22, 109 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01060-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01060-1

Keywords

  • Xp11.2
  • Translocational renal cell carcinoma
  • TFE3 gene
  • RCC