Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

The association of pathogenic factors of metabolic syndrome on serum prostate-specific antigen levels: a pilot study

BMC Urology volume 19, Article number: 119 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels are correlated. To investigate the underlying effect of MetS on PSA levels, the relationship between the major pathogenic factors of MetS and serum PSA levels was studied.

Methods

A total of 506 ostensibly healthy men who underwent routine health check-ups were recruited to this study. We evaluated the effect of the major pathogenic factors of MetS, which included insulin resistance, a subclinical inflammatory state and sexual hormone changes, on serum PSA levels by using linear regression analysis and multivariate analysis after adjusting for age, BMI and prostate volume.

Results

When simultaneously adjusting for age, BMI, prostate volume and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, serum insulin levels and SHBG levels were inversely correlated with serum PSA levels (P = 0.049 and P = 0.004, respectively), and testosterone levels were positively correlated with serum PSA levels (P = 0.039). In multivariate regression models, serum insulin levels and serum SHBG levels were significantly associated with serum PSA levels (both P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Among the major pathogenic factors of metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance and sexual hormone changes may be the most significant contributors to the decline in serum PSA levels.

Peer Review reports

Background

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in the world, with nearly 1.3 million new cases and neerly 0.4 million PCa-associated deaths worldwide in 2018, and becoming the 5th leading cause of cancer-associated death in men [1]. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing has been take for worldwide as a screening and diagnostic tool for PCa management [2]; however, the sensitivity and specificity of serum PSA levels are limited, as many factors, for instance age, obesity, prostate volume (PV), and benign prostate diseases, may significantly affect PSA levels [3].

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is considered as a complicated clinical disease characterized by a combination of multiple metabolic disorders, which include obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia and insulin resistance [4]. MetS is prevalent worldwide and has become a major social and public health issue in the last 2 decades. Previous studies demonstrated that MetS may be involved in the onset and progression of certain types of cancer including carcinoma of the liver, colon, breast, bladder, prostate, etc. [5]. Additionally, studies that aimed to improve PCa management have also demonstrated the specific relationship between MetS and PSA levels [6,7,8]. Our previous study made investigate the association between MetS and serum PSA levels. We first found that the diagnosis of MetS decreased serum PSA levels by 11.3% compared to the absence of MetS after adjustment with a larger PV in MetS patients, at the same time, there is a linear relationship between the decrease of PSA and the number of components of metabolic syndrome [9].

However, the detailed effect of MetS on PSA levels is still unclear. In the recent period of time, increasing evidence has suggested insulin resistance (IR), a subclinical inflammatory state and sex hormone changes may be the major pathogenic factors involved in MetS [4]. Historically, IR was considered the key feature of MetS, and the effect of IR significantly increased the prevalence of MetS [10].

Second, previous studies clearly demonstrated that there was a causal relationship between changes in serum sex hormone levels and MetS, as MetS was accompanied by sex hormone imbalances [11,12,13]. Finally, MetS was also considered a low-grade systematic inflammatory state that may enable the body to release more subclinical inflammatory factors, such as IL-6, CRP and TNF-α [14,15,16,17]. Interestingly, although a systematic study has not been carried out so far, individual studies have shown that the abovementioned major pathogenic factors involved in MetS may play a role in serum PSA levels [18,19,20].

As the underlying mechanism connecting MetS to PSA levels is complicated and undefined, there is a compelling need for further understanding these topics. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to clarify the underlying mechanism connecting MetS to serum PSA levels by using multivariate regression models.

Methods

From October 2014 to August 2015, by routine physical examination programs, 506 men over 45 years old were recruited consecutively to the study. By completing a standardized, structured questionnaire, subjects who were diagnosed with urethritis and prostatitis, urethral stricture, and neurogenic bladder, and who had a history of urological surgery or trauma and malignant diseases of the urinary system were excluded from this study. Additionally, subjects were also excluded if they had received anticholinergics, 5α-reductase inhibitors or hormone replacement therapy. These study protocols were approved by the the ethics committee of Beijing shijitan hospital affiliated to capital medical university and China railway corporation, and all subjects received informed consent and agreed in writing prior to registration.

All subjects completed the International Prostate Symptom Sore (I-PSS) questionnaire after Chinese translation, and the medical history of subjects was collected using a standardized, structured questionnaire. Anthropometric measurements, including blood pressure (mmHg), body weight (kg), height (cm) and waist circumference (cm), were measured by trained nurses using a standardized protocol. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by using the formula (Square of weight/height). The PV (cm3) was measured by suprapubic ultrasonography (3.5 MHz, Hitachi EUB-400, Tokyo, Japan) using the formula for the volume of an ellipse (height×width×length×π/6).

Before undergoing direct recording electronic, a 10-mL, 12-h fasting blood specimen was drawn for biochemical analyses after the participants had been relaxed sitting for 15 min. The biochemical index analysis included PSA, fasting blood glucose (FBG), triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and total cholesterol. Insulin, 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), estradiol, testosterone, leptin, resistin, adiponectin, Il-6, CRP and TNF-α were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods. The IR index was derived using the HOMA arithmetic: FBG (mg/dL) × Insulin (μU/mL)/405 [21].

We defined MetS using the criteria established by the 2009 joint statement from the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity [4]. According to that report, MetS was diagnosed based on the simultaneous occurrence of at least three of the following five risk factors: waist circumference ≥ 90 cm; triglyceride levels≥150 mg/dL or drug treatment for elevated triglyceride levels; HDL cholesterol≤40 mg/dL or drug treatment for low HDL cholesterol; elevated blood pressure (systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥ 85 mmHg or antihypertensive drug treatment with a history of hypertension); and FBG levels≥100 mg/dL or drug treatment for elevated FBG levels.

Continuous variables are shown as the mean ± SD, and categorical variables are shown as numbers and percentages. We divided subjects into two groups based on the presence of MetS. The clinical characteristics were compared using an independent t test for continuous variables and a chi-square test for categorical variables. Multivariate linear regression models were used to evaluate the effect of MetS-related factors on serum PSA levels. Furthermore, we divided subjects into four groups based on the quartile serum levels of insulin and SHBG to investigate whether there was a linear difference in the mean PSA level among the groups by using ANOVA. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 13.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and two-tailed P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

The baseline characteristics of the subjects are presented in Table 1. The mean age was 69.3 ± 8.3 years. The overall prevalence of MetS in the entire cohort was 37.5% (190/506). Age, BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure (which included the systolic pressure and diastolic pressure), FBG, triglycerides, PV, IPSS score, HOMA index and leptin levels were significantly higher in subjects with MetS than in subjects without MetS (all P < 0.01). HDL-C, TNF-α and testosterone levels were significantly lower in subjects with MetS than in subjects without MetS (all P < 0.05).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics
Full size table

In Table 2, results shows that among the MetS components only HDL-C was positively and significantly correlated with serum PSA levels after adjusting for age, BMI and PV (P = 0.046).

Table 2 Relationship between MetS and PSA
Full size table

As shown in Table 3, after adjustment with age, BMI, PV and HDL-C in separate multivariate linear regression models, the data showed that serum insulin levels, SHBG and serum testosterone levels were significantly and linearly correlated with PSA levels (all P < 0.05). Serum testosterone levels were positively associated with serum PSA levels, while serum insulin levels and SHBG were negatively associated with serum PSA levels. Interestingly, when serum insulin levels, SHBG and serum testosterone levels were simultaneously adjusted in addition to adjusting age, BMI, PV and HDL-C, serum insulin and SHBG levels still showed significant and negative relationships with serum PSA levels (both P < 0.05).

Table 3 Analysis of MetS-related affect PSA
Full size table

Finally, we divided subjects into four groups based on the quartile serum levels of insulin and SHBG to investigate whether there were differences in the trend of serum PSA levels among the groups (Fig. 1). After adjusting for age, BMI, PV and HDL-C, the mean PSA level significantly and gradually decreased as serum insulin and SHBG levels increased (both P for this trend < 0.05).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Adjustment with age, BMI, PV and HDL-C, the mean PSA level decreased as (a) serum insulin and (b) SHBG levels increased

Full size image

Discussion

The results of the study indicated that insulin resistance and SHBG levels play a important role in the lower serum PSA levels in MetS patients. Previously, researchers have noted that the presence of MetS is associated with the risk of PCa development, but there was controversy over the correlation between MetS and the risk of PCa [22, 23]. The heterogeneity of previous research conclusions among different studies may be caused by the differences in sample sizes, baseline characteristics, MetS diagnostic criteria and follow-up time. However, considering the influence of MetS on the serum PSA level, this may be one of the reasons for the deviations in the correlation between MetS and the risk of PCa.

A study noted that although screening serum PSA levels can improve the detection rate of PCa, it has a relatively small impact on PCa-specific mortality, and researchers have suggested that when screening serum PSA levels, it is necessary to fully consider the problems of missed diagnosis and overdiagnosis [3]. The causes of these problems may involve the excessive interference of serum PSA levels.

In a study by Choi et al. [7], the serum PSA levels in the MetS group were lower than those in the control group (1.15 ± 0.91 vs. 1.26 ± 0.76 ng/ml, P = 0.006), and after adjusting for PV and plasma volume, the results were also significantly correlated. Research has suggested that MetS is an independent risk factor for decreased serum PSA levels (serum PSA levels fell by 4.1%, P = 0.046). A recent study from our research team demonstrated that serum PSA levels in the MetS group were lower than those in the non-MetS group (1.11 ± 0.79 vs. 1.21 ± 0.76 ng/ml, P = 0.026) and that MetS was an independent risk factor for a decrease in serum PSA levels, which can reduce the serum PSA level by 11.3%. We also reported that as the number of abnormal components in MetS increases, the serum PSA level presents a trend of progressive decline. This study was based on a sample of 45,540 healthy men aged 55 to 59 [9]. However, the serum PSA level was not associated with MetS in our study, which may have been due to the small sample size. However, based on our previous studies with large samples, it MetS is believed to be correlated with PSA declines.

A considerable number of studies have confirmed that MetS aggravates the degree of IR, and IR is not only the driving factor of MetS but is also one of the main pathogenic factors [10]. In a study of Parekh et al. on the relationship between physiological indicators and serum PSA concentration, their results showed that the serum PSA concentration was significantly and negatively correlated with IR (p = 0.04) after adjusting for age, BMI, and race [18]; Choi et al. [6] reached a similar conclusion in their study. However, previous studies failed to consider the large PV of MetS patients. Our results indicated a significant and negative association between insulin concentrations and PSA (P = 0.049) after adjustment with age, BMI, PV and HDL-C. Furthermore, the mean serum PSA levels showed a significantly declining trend with increasing insulin levels, as presented in Fig. 1a (P for trend =0.006). We believe that changes in the insulin level caused by IR are one of the pathogenic factors that play a crucial role in the influence of MetS on serum PSA levels.

Sofikerim et al. [24] analyzed 210 subject whose serum PSA level was less than 2.5 ng/ml and pointed out that there was no significant correlation between the serum PSA level with the serum testosterone and serum free testosterone concentration. A similar study demonstrated that there was no linear correlation between the serum testosterone concentration and the serum PSA level, and testosterone replacement therapy did not cause changes in the serum PSA level [25]. It is worth noting that Rastrelli et al. indicated a strong positive correlation between testosterone with PSA levels in subject with low testosterone; additionally, a similar idea was proposed in a previous study, in which researchers suggested that a natural decrease in serum androgen levels might alter PSA levels [26, 27]. Conversely, several studies have found a correlation between SHBG and the risk of MetS; as a carrier that combines and transports sexual steroids, changes in the SHBG level may better reflect changes in sexual hormone levels [11,12,13]. Considering the interaction between sex hormones, estradiol and DHT were also taken into account when we analyzed these data. Our results showed that the testosterone levels were positively associated with PSA levels after adjustment with age, BMI, PV and HDL-C, while SHBG was negatively correlated with serum PSA levels in the sex hormone factor group (P = 0.039, P = 0.004, respectively). The mean PSA levels tended to decrease as the concentration of SHBG increased (P for trend =0.047), as shown in Fig. 1b. We found that SHBG levels could be a better indicator than testosterone and estrogen, which should be considered further when examining the MetS-PSA relationship.

The pathology caused by MetS leads to chronic inflammation and changes in the serum levels of inflammatory factors and adipokines, including leptin, adiponectin, CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, etc. [14,15,16,17]. McDonald et al. found a correlation between serum CRP levels and elevated PSA levels (OR = 1.19; 95% CI, 1.06–1.33), suggesting that systemic inflammatory markers are associated with PSA elevation in the absence of prostate disease [19]. However, there was no significant association between serum leptin and adiponectin with PSA levels in previous studies [20, 28]. We found no association between subclinical inflammatory mediators and serum PSA levels, but the current results do not completely negate the influence of systemic inflammation on serum PSA levels, which may be caused by the interaction of inflammatory markers, such as leptin and adiponectin. Thus, we still need to conduct more detailed research and analysis to further clarify the correlation between serum PSA and inflammatory mediators.

Finally, indicators that had a significant correlation with the serum PSA level in previous studies were included in the multiple linear regression model after adjustment with for age, BMI, PV, HDL-C. There was a significant, negative correlated between insulin and SHBG with serum PSA levels (all P < 0.001). Previous research has indicated that SHBG are negatively correlated with glycosylated hemoglobin in people without diabetes, which indicates that there may be a relationship between SHBG and glucose homeostasis changes before diabetes [29]. Similar researches have found that there is a negative correlation between SHBG with insulin levels, insulin resistance, and diabetes risk, and researchers believe that low serum SHBG is an independent risk factor for type 2 diabetes [30]. Although the relationship between SHBG and insulin resistance needs to be further explored, it can be concluded that both insulin resistance and SHBG levels play a crucial role in the changes in serum PSA levels in MetS patients.

There are still some limitations in the present study because MetS leads to considerable, complicated pathophysiologic changes. However, according to existing research results, we narrowed the scope of this study. Due to the interaction between pathogenic factors, the current results may ignore the impact of a single pathogenic factor, so we still need to further explore the influence of single pathogenic factors on serum PSA levels. In addition, since prostate biopsy was not included in our health examination plan, we cannot explicitly exclude the existence of prostate cancer, but because the average PSA levels of our target population were low, even a small number of patients with early PCa would not affect the results of the current study.

Conclusions

The decrease in serum PSA levels in MetS patients is mainly related to insulin resistance and serum SHBG levels. Urologists need to pay attention to this effect to comprehensively evaluate patient serum PSA levels, and subsequent studies need to further refine the serum PSA correction formula for MetS patients based on research results and to explore the physiological mechanism of this process.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

CRP:

C-reactive protein

DHT:

5α-Dihydrotestosterone

FBG:

Fasting blood glucose

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

LDL:

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

MetS:

Metabolic syndrome

Pca:

Prostate cancer

PSA:

Prostate-specific antigen

PV:

Prostate volume

SHBG:

Sex hormone binding globulin

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carter HB, Albertsen PC, Barry MJ, et al. Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2013;190(2):419–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ilic D, Djulbegovic M, Jung JH, et al. Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2018;362:k3519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the international diabetes federation task force on epidemiology and prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; world heart federation; international atherosclerosis society; and International Association for the Study of obesity. Circulation. 2009;120(16):1640–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Esposito K, Chiodini P, Colao A, et al. Metabolic syndrome and risk of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(11):2402–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi HC, Park JH, Cho BL, et al. The illusion of prostate-specific antigen decline in patients with metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance. BJU Int. 2011;108(11):1756–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi WS, Heo NJ, Paick JS, et al. Prostate-specific antigen lowering effect of metabolic syndrome is influenced by prostate volume. Int J Urol. 2016;23(4):299–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim YJ, Cho YJ, Oh JE, et al. The association between metabolic syndrome and prostate-specific antigen levels. Int J Urol. 2008;15(10):905–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao S, Xia M, Tang J, et al. Actual lowering effect of metabolic syndrome on serum prostate-specific antigen levels is partly concealed by enlarged prostate: results from a large-scale population-based study. BJU Int. 2017;120(4):482–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weiss R, Dziura J, Burgert TS, et al. Obesity and the metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(23):2362–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bhasin S, Jasjua GK, Pencina M, et al. Sex hormone-binding globulin, but not testosterone, is associated prospectively and independently with incident metabolic syndrome in men: the Framingham heart study. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(11):2464–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brand JS, van der Tweel I, Grobbee DE, et al. Testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin and the metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(1):189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sa EQ, Sa FC, Oliveira KC, et al. Association between sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and metabolic syndrome among men. Sao Paulo Med J. 2014;132(2):111–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gacci M, Vignozzi L, Sebastianelli A, et al. Metabolic syndrome and lower urinary tract symptoms: the role of inflammation. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2013;16(1):101–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ackermann D, Jones J, Barona J, et al. Waist circumference is positively correlated with markers of inflammation and negatively with adiponectin in women with metabolic syndrome. Nutr Res. 2011;31(3):197–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pravenec M, Kajiya T, Zidek V, et al. Effects of human C-reactive protein on pathogenesis of features of the metabolic syndrome. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex : 1979). 2011;57(4):731–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Esteghamati A, Noshad S, Khalilzadeh O, et al. Contribution of serum leptin to metabolic syndrome in obese and nonobese subjects. Arch Med Res. 2011;42(3):244–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Parekh N, Lin Y, Marcella S, et al. Associations of lifestyle and physiologic factors with prostate-specific antigen concentrations: evidence from the National Health and nutrition examination survey (2001-2004). Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17(9):2467–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McDonald AC, Vira MA, Vidal AC, et al. Association between systemic inflammatory markers and serum prostate-specific antigen in men without prostatic disease - the 2001-2008 National Health and nutrition examination survey. Prostate. 2014;74(5):561–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Burton A, Martin RM, Holly J, et al. Associations of adiponectin and leptin with stage and grade of PSA-detected prostate cancer: the ProtecT study. Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24(2):323–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, et al. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28(7):412–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Xiang YZ, Xiong H, Cui ZL, et al. The association between metabolic syndrome and the risk of prostate cancer, high-grade prostate cancer, advanced prostate cancer, prostate cancer-specific mortality and biochemical recurrence. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2013;32:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gacci M, Russo GI, De Nunzio C, et al. Meta-analysis of metabolic syndrome and prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017;20(2):146–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sofikerim M, Oruc O, Eskicorapci S, et al. Correlation of serum androgens and pituitary hormone levels with serum PSA less than 2.5 ng/ml. Sci World J. 2007;7:1128–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Reis LO, Denardi F, Faria EF, et al. Correlation between testosterone and PSA kinetics in metastatic prostate Cancer patients treated with diverse chemical castrations. Am J Mens Health. 2015;9(5):430–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rastrelli G, et al. Serum PSA as a predictor of testosterone deficiency. J Sex Med. 2013;10(10):2518–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Morgentaler A, Bruning CR, DeWolf WC. Occult prostate cancer in men with low serum testosterone levels. JAMA. 1996;276(23):1904–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fowke JH, Matthews CM, Buchowski MS, et al. Association between prostate-specific antigen and leptin, adiponectin, HbA1c or C-peptide among African-American and Caucasian men. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2008;11(3):264–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Brand JS, Wareham NJ, Dowsett M, et al. Associations of endogenous testosterone and SHBG with glycated haemoglobin in middle-aged and older men. Clin Endocrinol. 2011;74(5):572–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ding EL, Song Y, Malik VS, et al. Sex differences of endogenous sex hormones and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295(11):1288–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable.

Funding

Funding from Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (No. Z141100002114005) and the China Railway Corporation (No. 2014Z005-C) is mainly used for data collection. Funds are used for the data collection portion.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Bo-Wen Xia and Si-Cong Zhao contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10th Tieyi Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100038, China

    Bo-Wen Xia, Si-Cong Zhao, Zong-Ping Chen, Chao Chen, Tian-Shu Liu, Fan Yang & Yong Yan

Authors
  1. Bo-Wen Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Si-Cong Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zong-Ping Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chao Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tian-Shu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fan Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yong Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XBW, ZSC, YY have made substantial contributions to the designed of the work and analyzed and interpreted of the data and drafted the manuscript and revised it. CZP, CC, YF and LTS have made contributions to collection of the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Bo-Wen Xia: Postgraduate of Capital Medical University.

Si-Cong Zhao, Zong-Ping Chen, Chao Chen, Tian-Shu Liu, Fan Yang: Doctor of Capital Medical University.

Yong Yan: Chief physician; Professor and doctoral supervisor of Capital Medical University; Doctor of Universitat Dusseldorf; Doctor of Peking University.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Yan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approved by the ethics committee of Beijing shijitan hospital affiliated to capital medical university and China railway corporation (No. 2014Z005-C). Informed consent was obtained and written from all subjects before enrollment.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, BW., Zhao, SC., Chen, ZP. et al. The association of pathogenic factors of metabolic syndrome on serum prostate-specific antigen levels: a pilot study. BMC Urol 19, 119 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0549-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0549-2

Keywords

BMC Urology

ISSN: 1471-2490

Contact us